Oops, I have a couple of changes here:
1) Adding a "Create user groups" section to the new org guide.
2) Moving a tip out of how-to-invite-users-to-join.md, so that I
can reuse that section in the Zulip for clases guide I'm working
on without having the tip in it.
We pass allow_realm_admin as True to access_stream_by_id for
`GET users/{user_id}/subscriptions{stream_id}` endpoint
because we want to allow non-subscribed admins to get
subscription status in private streams.
Fixes#19077.
The links we have now redirect to "My groups" and not to our
Google group. Also, the RSS feed is no longer supported by Google,
so we should no longer link to it.
Fixes#19560.
For background, the .topic_move_breadcrumb_messages and
.message_edit_breadcrumb_message classes is applied to these checkboxes.
We add margin-top of 10px to the second checkbox to space them
appropriately. Additionally, we can remove some unnecessary complexity
from the template/CSS.
With a tweak from tabbott to remove the break-row logic as well.
Fixes#19947.
CircleCI expected 3434; GitHub Actions expects 1001. This is the
reason zulip-ci.yml currently needs to mess with the permissions in
/__w.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Using user IDs instead of emails is more reliable since users can
have arbitrarily complex emails that are hard to encode in a URL.
This has led to NoReverseMatch exceptions in the past.
This commit adds related_name parameter to UserGroup.direct_members
such that we can use direct_groups instead of the default
usergroupmembership_set for getting all the groups of which the
user is direct member.
This commit also sets related_name of UserGroupMembership.user_group
and UserGroupMembership.user_profile to "+" which means that we will
not be having backward relations for these. This change is correct
since we would need to use the recursive queries to get all the
groups of a user and all the members of a group after we add the
subgroups concept in next commit. This leads to us using direct_members
field of UserGroup instead of usergroupmembership_set in mention code,
but this will soon be replaced with the recursive query function to
include subgroup's members as well.
Extracted this commit from #19866.
Authored-by : Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This commit makes the query in get_user_group_direct_members
efficient by directly fetching user-profile ids instead of
first fetching user profile object and then id.
It can be pretty annoying to lose your place when replying to an old
message, even though every other chat application does this. And it
doesn't really buy us much; the user can always scroll down if they
want to, we have a helpful notification about where their message is
(which could be improved), and then we don't need to add some sort of
new complicated logic to avoid marking messages as read unexpectedly,
which the existing logic for this block badly needed.
(It had existing logic of that form dating from the pre-unread counts
pointer era).
Fixes#11462.
The from_scroll=true setting has been present since essentially the
beginning of time (6ae117ea5f), and has
moved around a number of times since. It's possible that it was
correct with the UI model as originally implemented, but the behavior
it creates now is that sending a message in the home view does not
move the cursor, and sending in a narrow does, without any intent
behind that behavior.
Further, the logic for controlling whether to display a "Scroll down"
notification clearly expects that this code path will actually trigger
a scroll to the current message, which would be the case without the
from_scroll setting.
The previous commit apparently didn't have its migration attached properly.
Since this is just a reference to a ManyToManyField, this migration
doesn't actually modify the database, but it is needed for CI to pass.
This commit renames members field of UserGroup to direct_members
for better readability because in the new permissions model, a
user group can be a sub-group of another group and thus technically
members of sub-group will also be members of that group.
This is a prep commit for new permissions model.
Extracted this commit from #19866.
Co-authored-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This is a prep commit for new permissions model in
which a user group would be able to have a subgroup.
This commit renames get_memberships_of_users to
get_direct_memberships_of_users to specify that
the function is used only to fetch the direct
memberships and not memberships of subgroups of
the direct group.
Extracted this commit from #19866.
Co-authored-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This is a prep commit for new permissions model in which a user
group would be able to have a subgroup.
This commit renames get_user_groups to get_direct_user_groups
to specify that the function is used only to fetch the direct
groups that user is part of and not subgroups of the direct
group.
Extracted this commit from #19866.
Co-authored-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This is a prep commit for new permissions model in which a user group would
be able to have a subgroup.
This commit renames get_user_group_members to get_user_group_direct_members
to specify that the function is used only to fetch direct members of group
and excludes the subgroup's members.
Extracted this commit from #19866.
Co-authored-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This commit adds django-cte as dependency
which will be used for querying recursive
group membership.
Extracted this commit from #19866.
Co-authored-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This commit refactors the display settings code to use
a single handler similar to what we do in notification
settings. We still keep default language and emojiset
setting as they are handled differently and they do
not call 'change_display_setting' directly on changing
input.
We refactor the 'change_display_setting' to directly
accept status element as parameter and not class as
a string. We also add a common class to the subsection
div such that we can get status element for each of
them easily.
We do not need to check for_realm_settings variable for
left_side_userlist handler since realm-level defaults
now uses save-discard widget and we return early in
that case and thus for_realm_settings will always be
false at this point.
There is a bug when a newly created stream appears in the notification
settings table if user changes any setting in 'Streams' row of the
table even though user has not changed the notification setting of
the stream and thus the stream should follow the global-level values.
The stream is correctly not added to the table if user changes the
setting after reloading once after creating the stream.
The bug is due to the notification settings of the new-stream being
set to the user's global settings at time of stream creation which
are not overridden since the stream-creation event contains only
stream fields and not subscription fields. And the newly created
stream is not present in the table after reload because during
initialization of the client-level data structures the notification
setting values are overridden by the values stored in server.
This commit fixes create_sub_from_server_data code to initially have
the notification settings set as null in the sub object which are
overridden by the correct value during initialization. This keeps
the notification setting values as null just after stream creation.
Fixes#19933.
This will be useful to let users enable/disable
sharing read receipts once we add that feature.
Note: Added "I've" to IGNORED_PHRASES in
tools/lib/capitalization.py to avoid capitalization
errors for the label text of this setting.
Note: These are not functional in enabling/disabling sending of
typing notifications with this commit.
Refactored the privacy settings update to keep the code less
duplicated along with making the addition of new settings easier.
From 430c5cb, in `fetch_initial_state_data`,
we only include legacy settings in the top level of
`state` and the newer ones are stored in `state['user_settings']`.
That should've had a corresponding change in apply_event().
Also, fixed a test related to this logic.
From 430c5cb, we do not send events for settings added after
introduction of `user_settings` event.
This test wasn't considering that and started failing on
adding new user_settings.
This isn't necessary as `settings_checkbox.hbs` template used
for presence enabled setting in `account_settings.hbs` takes
care of checking/unchecking this checkbox.
Alya Abbott
Morgan Njaw
Sahil Batra
Anders Kaseorg
Eeshan Garg
anurastogiji
Tim Abbott
Mateusz Mandera
Dinesh
Aman Agrawal
anurastogiji
Adam Benesh