Also avoid prompting for full name time more than once.
Adds TOS version field to Remote server user.
Co-authored-by: Karl Stolley <karl@zulip.com>
Co-authored-by: Aman Agrawal <amanagr@zulip.com>
This is a general link for logging into the billing system on behalf of
a server, but it's tied to the .contact_email and takes the user
straight to the /deactivate/ page via the next_page mechanism.
The separation of files no longer makes any sense, with some of these
forms being used by the RemoteRealm and legacy server flows together.
And in general we don't need to scatter this stuff across files.
Also, the unifying of the class of loader on the buttons, fixes a visual
bug on the final "Confirm login" page where you would see it spinning
for half a second upon loading the page, until the .hide() code
triggered.
The way the flow goes now is this:
1. The user initiaties login via "Billing" in the gear menu.
2. That takes them to `/self-hosted-billing/` (possibly with a
`next_page` param if we use that for some gear menu options).
3. The server queries the bouncer to give the user a link with a signed
access token.
4. The user is redirected to that link (on `selfhosting.zulipchat.com`).
Now we have two cases, either the user is logging in for the first time
and already did in the past.
If this is the first time, we have:
5. The user is asked to fill in their email in a form that's shown,
pre-filled with the value provided inside the signed access token.
They POST this to the next endpoint.
6. The next endpoint sends a confirmation email to that address and asks
the user to go check their email.
7. The user clicks the link in their email is taken to the
from_confirmation endpoint.
8. Their initial RemoteBillingUser is created, a new signed link like in
(3) is generated and they're transparently taken back to (4),
where now that they have a RemoteBillingUser, they're handled
just like a user who already logged in before:
If the user already logged in before, they go straight here:
9. "Confirm login" page - they're shown their information (email and
full_name), can update
their full name in the form if they want. They also accept ToS here
if necessary. They POST this form back to
the endpoint and finally have a logged in session.
10. They're redirected to billing (or `next_page`) now that they have
access.
For the last form (with Full Name and ToS consent field), this pretty
shamelessly re-uses and directly renders the
corporate/remote_realm_billing_finalize_login_confirmation.html
template. That's probably good in terms of re-use, but calls for a
clean-up commit that will generalize the name of this template and the
classes/ids in the HTML.
* Reformat "This is a legacy plan" notice on billing page.
* Add a link to the plan name on upgrade page title.
* Tweak discount style on billing page.
* Add line break to server login page title.
* Match server login page title and tab title.
* For free trial, don't show number of licenses for current billing period.
* For free trial scheduled to downgrade, don't show number of
licenses for next billing period.
This adds the new tabs from /plans to:
* /for/business
* /self-hosting
And it isolates legacy styles to preserve the tabs on
/for/education
Fixes: #28013
Analogical to 1df8e00d7c which implemented
this for the RemoteRealm auth flow.
Except here we don't need to add next_page to the IdentityDict
(LegacyServerIdentityDict in this flow), because the redirect happens
immediately at remote_billing_legacy_server_login upon login - so no
need to have a structure to carry the info through intermediate steps.
[squash]: Update sponsorsip and question boxes for Cloud.
[squash]: Update tabs subtitles.
[squash]: Content for info boxes for self-hosted plans.
[squash]: Adjust content to fit design.
portico: Tweak /plans text.
This makes it possible for a self-hosted realm administrator to
directly access a logged-page on the push notifications bouncer
service, enabling billing, support contacts, and other administrator
for enterprise customers to be managed without manual setup.
If the update / add card session is successful, return user to
manual license management page if user was on it before clicking
the add / update card button.
We do not redirect to Zulip's billing page for confirmation
even when user did not had added a card already and the payment
is directly processed after adding a card so is better to just
rename the button.
We now use micromodal in the license update modal on billing page
to make it consistent with other modals in the app and this is
preparatory work for moving away from bootstrap as well.
This commit ensures that the Attribution, Jobs, and Team pages all
share a uniform structure to match those of other pages. This will
simplify styling and should ensure greater confidence when modifying
portico landing-page styles.
The one CSS modification here, for the jobs page, maintains the space
at the top of the "How we work" section.
These classes seem to have been copy-pasted from other portico pages
when styling was first done in
122dcc9760. With the current styles,
which are just a handful of rules not scoped to a specific page, it
just makes the billing pages look broken.
exempt_from_license_number_check was initially added allowing
organizations with it enabled to invite new users above their number of
licenses.
However, an organization with this permission enabled,
cannot upgrade if they weren't on a plan already - because when choosing
Manual license management, you cannot enter a number of licenses lower
than the current seat count. However, an organization like that probably
already has some users that they get free of charge - and thus they need
to be able to enter a lower number of licenses in order to upgrade.
This just replaces the billing/upgrade with the statement that
"Your organization has requested sponsored or discounted hosting.", so
it should include an obvious contact in case the customer wants to amend
something or just bump a request that may have gotten missed.
Previously this was only available on the upgrade page - meaning an
organization that already bought a plan wouldn't be able to request a
sponsorship to get a discount or such, even if qualified.
Adds a section in the development community norms about using the
custom linkifiers in chat.zulip for the different Zulip project
repositories on GitHub.
Creates new help article for supported web browsers. Also updates
links in the `/apps` landing page as well as the unsupported-browser
template and the `set-up-your-account` article.
Fixes#14732.
This commit adds "bootstrap-focus-style" class to the select
elements such that we can add CSS rule for focusing a select
element at single place only using this class.
This commit adds bootstrap CSS rules used for org type select
element in sponsorship page in billing.css.
This change is done so we can safely remove select CSS rules
from bootstrap.css as a part of our process to remove bootstrap.
We also remove inline style for this element and instead add
it with other CSS in billing.css.
We do not need "required" attribute in the org-type select element
in sponsorship form, since we select a value by default and there
is no way to not have any value for the select element.
Also, the "required" attribute was added twice somehow.
We can safely remove the form-horizontal class from form element in
support request page, since the display and vertical-align are already
applied by other CSS in bootstrap and margin is overridden by CSS in
portico_signin.css.
Overrides the default context `allow_search_engine_indexing` to
always be `False` for `templates/corporate/attribution.html` so
that it does not appear in Google / search engine indexes.
Updates test of documentation pages in `test_docs.py` to have an
option for corporate pages to set this value in the template and
verifies that the meta tag for robots noindex, nofollow is
always in the response.
The figure element here was used for a text bubble rather than a
graphics (i.e. "figure"), hence a div element is more appropriate.
This change doesn't effect the visual styling as verfied by comparing
the rendered result visually, and comparing the applied styles in the
devtools.
Changes all the uses of the word "operators" to "filters" in
contributor docs, help center, and landing page to align with
the updated help center documentation.
Replaces instances of "recent topics" in the web-app and documentation
to be "recent conversations".
Renames both `recent-topics.md` files in the help center to be
`recent-conversations.md` and updates/redirects links to new URL.
Does not update instances of "recent topics" in frontend code comments
and does not update the main overview changelog, for now.
Does not change case study text where "recent topics" was referenced
in a quote, but does change generic text references to be "recent
conversations".
Renames the help article on custom profile fields to reflect that
its content is not just about adding fields.
Adds a redirect from the old URL to the new URL and updates internal
links, linking to #add-a-custom-profile-field where appropriate.
Fixes#23170.
Removes the default title element of "Zulip" from `base.html` and
the default meta-description sentence from `meta_tags.html`. Also
removes default open graph metadata.
For portico templates that would would fail tests, set both
`PAGE_TITLE` and `PAGE_DESCRIPTION` variables with appropriate
content.
Co-authored-by: Alya Abbott <alya@zulip.com>
Adds HTML title elements to templates that extend either `base.html`,
`portico.html` or `portico_signup.html`, and that are not website
portico landing pages that will use the `PAGE_TITLE` variable to set
the HTML title element (see following commit in series).
Also, updates some templates for missing translation tags.
As a general rule, we want the title element (and page content)
translated. Exceptions that are updated in this commit are templates
used in the development environment, analytics templates that are used
by staff and templates related to Zephyr.
Renames existing template variables starting with `OPEN_GRAPH` to be
either `PAGE` or `PAGE_METADATA` since these variables are used for
adding both open graph metdata and page titles/descriptions for SEO.
Disables submit buttons on billing / upgrade page for demo
organizations since they will need to become permanent
organizations before upgrading to Zulip Cloud Standard.
Also creates an alert banner on the same page that links to
the help center article on demo organizations.
Updates sub-headers on demo organizations help center
article to match link text and to follow general convention
of using imperative verb forms in help center subheaders.
Part of #19523.
Co-authored by: Lauryn Menard <lauryn@zulip.com>
This replaces the TERMS_OF_SERVICE and PRIVACY_POLICY settings with
just a POLICIES_DIRECTORY setting, in order to support settings (like
Zulip Cloud) where there's more policies than just those two.
With minor changes by Eeshan Garg.
We do s/TOS/TERMS_OF_SERVICE/ on the name, and while we're at it,
remove the assumed zerver/ namespace for the template, which isn't
correct -- Zulip Cloud related content should be in the corporate/
directory.
I remove some spurious whitespace and a stray period
in zephyr-mirror, and then for all three I try to
line-wrap/indent in a way that's nicer for humans
and parsers to read.
I rewrote most of tools/lib/pretty-printer.py, which
was fairly easy due to being able to crib some
important details from the previous implementation.
The main motivation for the rewrite was that we weren't
handling else/elif blocks correctly, and it was difficult
to modify the previous code. The else/elif shortcomings
were somewhat historical in nature--the original parser
didn't recognize them (since they weren't in any Zulip
templates at the time), and then the pretty printer was
mostly able to hack around that due to the "nudge"
strategy. Eventually the nudge strategy became too
brittle.
The "nudge" strategy was that we would mostly trust
the existing templates, and we would just nudge over
some lines in cases of obviously faulty indentation.
Now we are bit more opinionated and rigorous, and
we basically set the indentation explicitly for any
line that is not in a code/script block. This leads
to this diff touching several templates for mostly
minor fix-ups.
We aren't completely opinionated, as we respect the
author's line wrapping decisions in many cases, and
we also allow authors not to indent blocks within
the template language's block constructs.