The reply-to autoscroll was using a flag that was redundant
to suppress_scroll_pointer_update and then updating it prematurely,
which caused the pointer to move when you clicked on a message to
reply to it. Now the pointer goes to the message you replied to.
(imported from commit e2f49fd6bd0da9a3f4b58c0eb08192ef0ee9abf0)
The main point of this fix is to move some more scroll-related code
into viewport.js, but it also fixes a bug where the size of #main_div
was not accurately representing the full height of the message list.
Making the calculation more accurate narrows the window where we
do pointer adjustements on mousewheel moves.
(imported from commit 5d821f459284c4dbd5ff8056001e54caf4355f1d)
We also record the historical edits to the message in this JSON format:
[{"prev_content": "new test message 14", "timestamp": 1369157249},
{"prev_content": "new test message 13", "timestamp": 1369157118}]
but we don't actually do anything with the information as of yet.
(imported from commit 2d5ca449b87b33ad035ab0e076a22e150c8e7267)
Most of the model logic pertaining to unread counts had been in
zephyr.js, along with a couple global variables. Now the code
is encapsulated in unread.js. It was a pretty straightforward
extraction with some minor method name changes. Also, a small
bit of the logic had also been in stream_list.js.
Conflicts:
tools/jslint/check-all.js
(imported from commit f0abdd48f26ab20c5beaef203479eb5a70dacfff)
Currently the interface for editing messages is limited to a
command-line API tool; it's great for testing with e.g.:
./api/examples/edit-message --message=348135 --content="test $(date +%s)" --site=http://localhost:9991 --subject="test"
The next commit will add a user interface for actually doing the editing.
(imported from commit bdd408cec2946f31c2292e44f724f96ed5938791)
This fixes a pretty subtle bug where the window-focus handler
wasn't updating the unread counts in the title, but it was
hard to notice, because as soon as you moved the mouse, the
problem fixed itself.
Apart from fixing the bug, this patch eliminates the expensive
mouseover handler, which is a big win.
The fix to the window-focus involved some unrelated cleanup. I
decoupled update_title_count() from received_messages(), as the
former method will probably live somewhere else soon.
Also, in order to get window-focus to update the title count,
I went pretty deep in the stack and added a call to
update_title_count() inside of update_unread_counts(). This
fixes window-focus as well as restoring that behavior to
code paths that were calling received_messages().
You'll see that call to update_title_count() is now adjacent
to the call to update_dom_with_unread_counts(), which is
fairly sensible, but then are calls to similar methods like
notifications.received_messages() that happen higher up in
the call chain, which seems kind of inconsistent to me. I
also don't like the fact that you have to go through a
mostly model-based function to get to view-based stuff, so
there are some refactorings coming.
(imported from commit 2261450f205f1aa81d30194b371a1c5ac6a7bdec)
The problem is that if you load a browser window in a stream narrow,
add_message_metadata will be called for the messages in the narrowed
view before it is called for the messages going into the main view
(thus inserting them into all_msg_list), resulting in duplicate
copies of messages.
This would be mostly OK except that we call
process_message_for_recent_subjects inside add_message_metadata, and
that function assumes it is only called once on each message
(otherwise it'll double-count the message).
(imported from commit a3e7f85874100cd93a6d07684605da04d9cc80c7)
Created a function message_viewport_info() to return more accurate
effective viewport info and called it from process_visible_unread_messages().
Also killed off a tiny bit of dead code in process_visible_unread_messages().
(imported from commit 985fcf2fb447dbf1026e2de37574c255a9bd6196)
This refactoring basically splits off two functions from update_unread_counts(),
which then becomes a simple three-liner.
The function get_unread_counts() is extracted, and it's purely functional
computation. It paves the way for a more pull-based approach to getting "unread"
counts, where other parts of the program can just call it to get values as
needed without worrying about side effects. It is staying in zephyr.js for
now.
The other function is stream_list.update_dom_with_unread_counts(), which
has a new home in stream_list.js. It handles all the DOM manipulation
aspect of unread counts in the left pane, mostly by delegating to smaller
functions within stream_list. Some of those smaller functions can now
be turned into private methods FWIW, but I'm not sure it's worth the
trouble.
(imported from commit 799f9ebbaed8d530829a4741ef14be04bd8abf5a)
This is a prefactoring to eventually eliminate the home_unread_messages
global variable. More commits to follow.
In order to set up process_loaded_for_unread() not to modify
global variable to get its job done, we want to pull it out of
add_messages(), so that add_messages() doesn't have to pass back
state to the 9 different places in the codebase where it's called.
There are only 2 places where process_loaded_for_unread() get
called after this commit.
In order to facilitate pulling up process_loaded_for_unread(), I
made it so that the contract for add_messages() was to accept
already-hydrated messages. This way I could hydrate the messages
before calling process_loaded_for_unread() without have to
worry about double-caching them in add_messages. This will
slightly improve performance, but it was mostly done for code
clarity.
(imported from commit ad5aaad5b1f22c31647370f4c9dcb5f89d7d99a7)
This was a workaround for a number of other bugs we had, but at this
point just serves to make debugging more difficult.
(imported from commit 6662b7854c265bd8016f6c8ce75a095731211a45)
Previously we never sent desktop notifications when the browser was
focused, even if the message appeared offscreen. After this commit
there are only a few cases when PM or other notifiable message doesn't
trigger a desktop notification:
(1) You sent it yourself
(2) It was onscreen when it arrived while your Humbug window had focus
(imported from commit e381c02c0e6794594d6934f57249a11ba2a88210)
The .height() and .width() functions are actually pretty expensive for
the number of times we call them. The viewport height and width
don't change often, though, so we can just cache them and recalculate
them on window resize.
(imported from commit 129fb8c058144125e2974f6b7967cd9f1a5c9ead)
The .height() and .width() functions are actually pretty expensive
for the number of times we call them. The callers of within_viewport
already know the offset and height of the row, so we just pass them
in so the values don't have to be recalculated.
(imported from commit d1c077bd87463d695f0bbe337b6a8b04ac2d17ce)
We previously kept the lists in the DOM for all streams and updated
them all when new messages arrived. This was very expensive for
large numbers of streams, so we now just build the subject lists on
demand.
(imported from commit 937ad4322ce2014200aeae8645f79875f6af576e)
We memoize add_message_metadata by checking if the message is already
in the all_msg_list. Therefore, we need to add messages to that
message list before we add it to the narrowed_msg_list.
(imported from commit 4346179376ef6f982162c02c6152a0d294bfb2c0)
We were previously doing this on every message. Because
update_recent_subjects is linear in the number of streams in the
sidebar, this became very slow when we enabled the streams sidebar
for the MIT realm.
(imported from commit 95cd71d83bbcc08cc6c5c79ca567b5d6b9b17173)
This fixes a bug where if you were narrowed to a search and received
a new message that belonged in that search, the message would appear
to have an empty subject and content.
(imported from commit fe1dbf584d3659d57c5b70c7eb45cb22bbc9732f)
In the case where we're getting old messages for a narrowed view, the
anchor message id might not actually be in the result set so there's
no reason to fetch an extra message.
(imported from commit e610d1f2cb95be3ff9fce6dc95e40c560bc5bf84)
Previously, our check for whether we needed to call load_old_messages
a second time on page load to get up to the present caused us to
basically always do such a call.
(imported from commit b599041e8c0853b4c8c9ab2def6679142302523e)
Previously we were using message.display_recipient everywhere, which
is actually pretty confusing.
(imported from commit a58471172e28c039af8e290362e54b6660543924)
This should fix the problems we've been having with out-of-order
message deliveries, and is also an important prerequisite for showing
historical messages.
(imported from commit 77a18a526bf8ec4f1f70b776ac8b7e189d00bcf4)
This is a V1 of this feature. For now, the only way to expand is by narrowing
to the stream---future revisions may add a manual toggle if it is found to be
useful.
Additionally, showing per-subject unread counts will be coming in a future revision
as well.
(imported from commit fb5df0d27e928fa3b0f32b9ff2c1c508202cf7e5)
This commit will incorrectly list past-online users as active, a shortcoming that is
addressed in the next commit
(imported from commit b018767df686f88c0ca939c067c573e4d7cea357)
This allows blueslip to catch exceptions from the event handlers on
these elements in addition to the other benefits that not using
inline handlers provide.
(imported from commit 2bdcb2496c6c08fa7228a20ce6164b527cf64e41)
This appears to have been caused by our code for preventing the
viewport from being recentered if you move the pointer away from the
edge of the viewport from a position near the edge, which was being
run even when it was not triggered by a scroll event.
(imported from commit 0a4b3dcca75a6e5dbf1beb77a5249bd6a9c61341)
This has the nice side effect of not requiring us to trigger the
events manually in the success callbacks of our subscribe/unsubscribe
ajax calls.
(imported from commit e8d9970b708e9832d22be4803570071bacb46792)
We currently only use these events to change the autocomplete lists.
I figure that the presence list will be updated by presence events.
(imported from commit e9c1466659c4bfd463806656e0023984a4ea4177)
Before this commit, if you try to arrow around when the selected
message is outside the pointer threshold for recentering, you get a
big jump, even if you are arrowing towards the center of the viewport.
(imported from commit 5c15d5ccccdf027a8bfa8b79bf519fccbfa971d8)
We have to be careful about timing here. If Tornado fails to load
existing queues on startup then all clients will reload at once. On
the other hand, if we don't reload immediately then the client won't
get any events until the reload. For now, I've opted for the
user-friendly approach, so we need to make sure that Tornado gets a
chance to dump and reload its queues correctly.
(imported from commit 51a6ab31cb461e1e3373486dcec2e57eb12a8077)
This was biting us before when the user would leave a narrow before a
get_old_messages call associated with it finished. Specifically,
search.maybe_highlight_message() would assume a message was in the
DOM when it wasn't any more.
We also have to hide the 'loading more messages' indicator when
reseting the 'load more' status because otherwise it wouldn't get
hidden like normal in the load_old_messages() continuation, causing a
load_more_messages() not to fire when re-entering a narrow.
(imported from commit 4a136dd01305b039c0970f897b07e603b87d5d8e)
Previously, if for some reason pointer updates were not returning from
the server, the client would resend its request every second, rather
than waiting for the previous request to fail before sending a new
one.
(imported from commit d134adc50aabd135c7631913fecab3519aca6640)
It's closer to a presence query than an update, and more importantly
this moves this out of Tornado -- previously Tornado was spending at
least 3ms per recipient on messages sent to the MIT realm fetching all
this data to return back to users. This should save around 100ms per
message sent to a popular stream the MIT realm -- but more
importantly, each such event is 100ms during which Tornado is not
processing other messages.
(imported from commit 134169f0fdcd9f6640fda957edc4a28b07783d8e)
Now that Zev's message list branch is merged, there's no longer a
performance penalty for loading these old messages, and it improves
our narrowing performance to have them loaded.
This code is slightly different from the original commit
93d47710891cfc4db9fa00beaa5ccd10113aa1c3 since the way to access the
first element in the message list and the API for get_old_messages
have changed since then.
(imported from commit f295f892bea9327eb8316225b7b98f0e3b3fdc9a)
Our mobile apps (which don't support in_home_view filtering) will move
the pointer to a message that isn't actually in the home view, so we
need to accept that sort of input for now (and maybe in general --
even if we fix our mobile apps, third-party clients may screw this up
too).
(imported from commit ce837e972f0581abd1df44fdb2dd5270dfb9afde)
We also grey out the box to prevent the user from clicking twice.
This closes trac #1030.
(imported from commit eec810e3fbc5b7c9350c2d91e448fb27d4c856f8)
Previously, if a narrowed view started out with no message selected,
one would never be selected unless you clicked on it.
(imported from commit 11c6a1a8d046ec33a3dbea4067c40896be137485)
Require POST method for /accounts/logout. This has the side effect of
automatically enabling Django's CSRF protection.
(imported from commit 44b1b6ebaadc1c03006e21ae54ac768e31234801)
Steve Howell
Leo Franchi
Tim Abbott
Zev Benjamin
Jessica McKellar
Keegan McAllister
Luke Faraone
Reid Barton