Currently there are only tests for verifying the error case and there
are no tests to check the case where messages are sent successfully
in 'STREAM_POST_POLICY_RESTRICT_NEW_MEMBERS' stream.
This commit adds tests for checking that full members and bots owned
by them can send message successfully in streams with post policy as
'STREAM_POST_POLICY_RESTRICT_NEW_MEMBERS'.
We currently not allow new bots to send message in stream with post
policy as 'STREAM_POST_POLICY_RESTRICT_NEW_MEMBERS', but we should
allow them to send messages if their owner is a full member.
This will make it consistent with behavior in stream with post
policy as 'STREAM_POST_POLICY_ADMINS_ONLY' where we allow non admin
bots with owner as admin to send messages.
According to tests we should not allow bot without owners to
post in streams with STREAM_POST_POLICY_RESTRICT_NEW_MEMBERS.
But the code does not handle this and the related test passes
and raises error for case of bots without owner because the bot
is itself a new member.
This commit fixes this by adding a condition to check if there
is no bot owner and then raise error if there is no owner.
Now we just update the whole row any time a sub
changes. This prevents a whole class of bugs.
As the TODOs indicate here, some of the post-processing
that we have to do on rows after rendering the
template will soon go away.
I audited all the functions in stream_ui_updates and
added TODO comments to functions that are clearly just
updating rows in the left panel of Manage Streams.
In an upcoming commit I will simplify the approach so
that we just re-render the entire row.
The tooltips for the left panel of stream settings
have been broken since November 2018 due to my
commit 8f915da2ca.
The code prior to 2018 was restoring tooltips
right inside the loop where we were detaching
the row from the DOM to put it back into the
DOM at another place. And then I tried to
just add them in bulk, forgetting that I was
in the middle of all the DOM manipulation (and
hence my selector for the loop was a noop).
Also, I don't think we've ever had them for live
events that add streams. (I fixed that too.)
It's not clear to me that this code is actually
necessary, as we get hover help without
calling $(...).tooltip(...) properly.
This is probably why we didn't notice any
breakage when we merged my 2018 commit.
Checking for the button was a brittle way to do this.
Note that the code on master is flawed insofar as
we don't respect the search filters. I don't fix that
bug here. This is a tactical change to eliminate
another function.
Upcoming changes will make it so that all the bugs
related to "notdisplayed" will simply go away.
These aren't relevant to most users, but in the interest of
transparency, we also don't want the existence of these to feel like a
secret. And maybe publishing their existence will result in folks who
we forget to add to these private streams asking about them.
We generally want to avoid clicking on DOM elements
that may not actually be visible due to the prior
operation. Instead, we can just find the visible
element after each step.
I also introduce a couple helper functions to
de-clutter the click/unclick/click steps, and I do
a couple extra clicks for good measure.
You can verify that the test will fail if you
add an early return to update_check_button_for_sub.
The "Narrow to PM with" notification above the composebox was
double-escaped, mangling names with single quotes in them. This removes
the escaping in i18next, causing the name to be escaped only in
handlebars.
These optimizations only makes sense when all connections at a TCP
level are coming from the same host or set of hosts; as such, they
are only enabled if `loadbalancer.ips` is set in the `zulip.conf`.
This is a minor refactor which renames the
notify_topic_moved_streams function to
send_message_moved_breadcrumbs.
This is done because this function will be also used
for other things in the future, when moving streams
or when using the /digress command, for example.
Added assertion to check that if a deprecated flag is in a field's
schema, then it should have deprecated mentioned in description
as well, and moved these checks to a separate function.
Fixes part of #15967.
We just want to reset the scrollbar here, which
we still do via ui.reset_scrollbar.
You don't want to preserve scroll position if
you are filtering or re-sorting.
We have long had this annoying two-pass way of building the
DOM that I am trying to eliminate.
The function names that I introduce here describe the current
situation more accurately.
In passing I make it so that we only throttle redraws when
users are actually typing. Using a throttled redraw when
you click on the sort icons is at best unnecessary, and it
may actually aggravate double clicks.
Lists that were followed by a paragraph (i.e. our p+ul, p+ol CSS rule)
in messages had negative top margin of -3px. Adjusting the margin
here is important, because the default styling would result in an
excessive gap that made bulleted lists weirdly far from the previous
paragraph. See #12113 for background.
However, the -3px negative margin was so large that it reduced spaces
between paragraph and lists, such that there was too little visible
separation between the two. We fix this by going with a 0px
margin-top instead.
This has been tested for various structures of messages:
1. text + bulleted list
2. bulleted list + unbulleted list(or two lists)
3. only list.
And it looks good in all cases.
Fixes#17284.
The code blocks and response blocks had small and unreadable font,
because they were using the bootstrap defaults without adjustment for
the size of content on the rest of the page. Fixes part of
zulip#15967.
This both is better copy and also cleared for translators, who in
languages with gendered nouns don't need to guess what gender to use
for "one" without context.
This bug was caught thanks to the earlier commit which
introduces the "Restart tutorial" feature. To reproduce
the bug,
1. Restart tutorial
2. Click "Got it!" on the intro_reply hotspot
3. Repeat steps 1 and 2
The hotspot for intro_reply won't disappear the second
time around and the intro_stream hotspot would be displayed
simultaneously.
The reason for this was the intro_reply's "Got it!"
button codepath never removing the item completely from
the DOM. This would then conflict with the new intro_reply
hotspot which would get assigned a different 'id'.
Steve Howell
Sumanth V Rao
Tim Abbott
sahil839
Anders Kaseorg
Mateusz Mandera
Wesley Aptekar-Cassels
Alex Vandiver
Aman Agrawal
Abhijeet Prasad Bodas
Suyash Vardhan Mathur
m-e-l-u-h-a-n