Since Django factors request.is_secure() into its CSRF check, we need
this to tell it to consider requests forwarded from nginx to Tornado
as secure.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
One should now be able to configure a regex by appending _regex to the
port number:
[tornado_sharding]
9802_regex = ^[l-p].*\.zulipchat\.com$
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
https://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ngx_http_map_module.html
Since Puppet doesn’t manage the contents of nginx_sharding.conf after
its initial creation, it needs to be renamed so we can give it
different default contents.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Some legitimate requests in Zulip can take more than 20s to be
processed, and we don't have a current problem where having a 20s
limit here is preventing a problem.
The `needrestart` tool added in 22.04 is useful in terms of listing
which services may need to be restarted to pick up updated libraries.
However, it prompts about the current state of services needing
restart for *every* subsequent `apt-get upgrade`, and defaulting core
services to restarting requires carefully manually excluding them
every time, at risk of causing an unscheduled outage.
Build a list of default-off services based on the list in
unattended-upgrades.
The default value in uwsgi is 4k; receiving more than this amount from
nginx leads to a 502 response (though, happily, the backend uwsgi does not
terminate).
ab18dbfde5 originally increased it from the unstated uwsgi default
of 4096, to 8192; b1da797955 made it configurable, in order to allow
requests from clients with many cookies, without causing 502's[1].
nginx defaults to a limitation of 1k, with 4 additional 8k header
lines allowed[2]; any request larger than that returns a response of
`400 Request Header Or Cookie Too Large`. The largest header size
theoretically possible from nginx, by default, is thus 33k, though
that would require packing four separate headers to exactly 8k each.
Remove the gap between nginx's limit and uwsgi's, which could trigger
502s, by removing the uwsgi configurability, and setting a 64k size in
uwsgi (the max allowable), which is larger than nginx's default limit.
uWSGI's documentation of `buffer-size` ([3], [4]) also notes that "It
is a security measure too, so adapt to your app needs instead of
maxing it out." Python has no security issues with buffers of 64k,
and there is no appreciable memory footprint difference to having a
larger buffer available in uwsgi.
[1]: https://chat.zulip.org/#narrow/stream/31-production-help/topic/works.20in.20Edge.20not.20Chrome/near/719523
[2]: https://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ngx_http_core_module.html#client_header_buffer_size
[3]: https://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ThingsToKnow.html
[4]: https://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Options.html#buffer-size
Support for this header was removed in Chrome 78, Safari 15.4, and
Edge 17. It was never supported in Firefox.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This check loads Django, and as such must be run as the zulip user.
Repeat the same pattern used elsewhere in nagios, of writing a state
file, which is read by `check_cron_file`.
Replication checks should only run on primary and replicas, not
standalone hosts; while `autovac_freeze` currently only runs on
primary hosts, it functions identically on replicas, and is fine to
run there.
Make `autovac_freeze` run on all `postgresql` hosts, and make
standalone hosts no longer `postgres_primary`, so they do not fail the
replication tests.
These style of checks just look for matching process names using
`check_remote_arg_string`, which dates to 8edbd64bb8. These were
added because the original two (`missedmessage_emails` and
`slow_queries`) did not create consumers, instead polling for events.
Switch these to checking the queue consumer counts that the
`check-rabbitmq-consumers` check is already writing out. Since the
`missedmessage_emails` was _already_ checked via the consumer check, a
duplicate is not added.
Even the `pageable_servers` group did not page for high load -- in
part because what was "high" depends on the servers. Set slightly
better limits based on server role.
`zmirror` itself was `zmirror_main` + `zmirrorp` but was unused; we
consistently just use the term `zmirror` for the non-personals server,
so use it as the hostgroup name.
The Redis nagios checks themselves are done against `redis` +
`frontends` groups, so there is no need to misleadingly place
`frontends` in the `redis` hostgroup.
5abf4dee92 made this distinction, then multitornado_frontends was
never used; the singletornado_frontends alerting worked even for the
multiple-Tornado instances.
Remove the useless and misleading distinction.
Even if Django and PostgreSQL are on the same host, the `nagios` user
may lack permissions to read accessory configuration files needed to
load the Django configuration (e.g. authentication keys).
Catch those failures, and switch to loading the required settings from
`/etc/zulip/zulip.conf`.
Without this, uwsgi does not release the GIL before going back into
`epoll_wait` to wait for the next request. This results in any
background threads languishing, unserviced.[1]
Practically, this results in Sentry background reporter threads timing
out when attempting to post results -- but only in situations with low
traffic, as in those significant time is spent in `epoll_wait`. This
is seen in logs as:
WARN [urllib3.connectionpool] Retrying (Retry(total=1, connect=None, read=None, redirect=None, status=None)) after connection broken by 'SSLError(SSLEOFError(8, 'EOF occurred in violation of protocol (_ssl.c:1131)'))': /api/123456789/envelope/
Or:
WARN [urllib3.connectionpool] Retrying (Retry(total=0, connect=None, read=None, redirect=None, status=None)) after connection broken by 'ProxyError('Cannot connect to proxy.', RemoteDisconnected('Remote end closed connection without response'))': /api/123456789/envelope/
Sentry attempts to detect this and warn, but due to startup ordering,
the warning is not printed without lazy-loading.
Enable threads, at a miniscule performance cost, in order to support
background workers like Sentry[2].
[1] https://github.com/unbit/uwsgi/issues/1141#issuecomment-169042767
[2] https://docs.sentry.io/clients/python/advanced/#a-note-on-uwsgi
Anders Kaseorg
Matt Keller
Alex Vandiver