mirror of https://github.com/zulip/zulip.git
132 lines
4.7 KiB
Markdown
132 lines
4.7 KiB
Markdown
# Web frontend unit tests
|
|
|
|
As an alternative to the black-box whole-app testing, you can unit test
|
|
individual JavaScript files that use the module pattern. For example, to
|
|
test the `foobar.js` file, you would first add the following to the
|
|
bottom of `foobar.js`:
|
|
|
|
> if (typeof module !== 'undefined') {
|
|
> module.exports = foobar;
|
|
> }
|
|
|
|
This makes `foobar.js` follow the CommonJS module pattern, so it can be
|
|
required in Node.js, which runs our tests.
|
|
|
|
Now create `frontend_tests/node_tests/foobar.js`. At the top, require
|
|
the [Node.js assert module](http://nodejs.org/api/assert.html), and the
|
|
module you're testing, like so:
|
|
|
|
> var assert = require('assert');
|
|
> var foobar = require('js/foobar.js');
|
|
|
|
(If the module you're testing depends on other modules, or modifies
|
|
global state, you need to also read [the next
|
|
section](handling-dependencies_).)
|
|
|
|
Define and call some tests using the [assert
|
|
module](http://nodejs.org/api/assert.html). Note that for "equal"
|
|
asserts, the *actual* value comes first, the *expected* value second.
|
|
|
|
> (function test_somefeature() {
|
|
> assert.strictEqual(foobar.somefeature('baz'), 'quux');
|
|
> assert.throws(foobar.somefeature('Invalid Input'));
|
|
> }());
|
|
|
|
The test runner (`index.js`) automatically runs all .js files in the
|
|
frontend\_tests/node directory.
|
|
|
|
## HTML output
|
|
|
|
The JavaScript unit tests can generate output to be viewed in the
|
|
browser. The best examples of this are in `frontend_tests/node_tests/templates.js`.
|
|
|
|
The main use case for this mechanism is to be able to unit test
|
|
templates and see how they are rendered without the complications
|
|
of the surrounding app. (Obviously, you still need to test the
|
|
app itself!) The HTML output can also help to debug the unit tests.
|
|
|
|
Each test calls a method named `write_handlebars_output` after it
|
|
renders a template with similar data. This API is still evolving,
|
|
but you should be able to look at existing code for patterns.
|
|
|
|
When you run `tools/test-js-with-node`, it will present you with a
|
|
message like "To see more output, open var/test-js-with-node/index.html."
|
|
Basically, you just need to open the file in the browser. (If you are
|
|
running a VM, this might require switching to another terminal window
|
|
to launch the `open` command.)
|
|
|
|
## Coverage reports
|
|
|
|
You can automatically generate coverage reports for the JavaScript unit
|
|
tests like this:
|
|
|
|
> tools/test-js-with-node cover
|
|
|
|
Then open `coverage/lcov-report/js/index.html` in your browser. Modules
|
|
we don't test *at all* aren't listed in the report, so this tends to
|
|
overstate how good our overall coverage is, but it's accurate for
|
|
individual files. You can also click a filename to see the specific
|
|
statements and branches not tested. 100% branch coverage isn't
|
|
necessarily possible, but getting to at least 80% branch coverage is a
|
|
good goal.
|
|
|
|
## Handling dependencies in unit tests
|
|
|
|
The following scheme helps avoid tests leaking globals between each
|
|
other.
|
|
|
|
First, if you can avoid globals, do it, and the code that is directly
|
|
under test can simply be handled like this:
|
|
|
|
> var search = require('js/search_suggestion.js');
|
|
|
|
For deeper dependencies, you want to categorize each module as follows:
|
|
|
|
- Exercise the module's real code for deeper, more realistic testing?
|
|
- Stub out the module's interface for more control, speed, and
|
|
isolation?
|
|
- Do some combination of the above?
|
|
|
|
For all the modules where you want to run actual code, add a statement
|
|
like the following to the top of your test file:
|
|
|
|
> add_dependencies({
|
|
> _: 'third/underscore/underscore.js',
|
|
> util: 'js/util.js',
|
|
> Dict: 'js/dict.js',
|
|
> Handlebars: 'handlebars',
|
|
> Filter: 'js/filter.js',
|
|
> typeahead_helper: 'js/typeahead_helper.js',
|
|
> stream_data: 'js/stream_data.js',
|
|
> narrow: 'js/narrow.js'
|
|
> });
|
|
|
|
For modules that you want to completely stub out, please use a pattern
|
|
like this:
|
|
|
|
> set_global('page_params', {
|
|
> email: 'bob@zulip.com'
|
|
> });
|
|
>
|
|
> // then maybe further down
|
|
> global.page_params.email = 'alice@zulip.com';
|
|
|
|
Finally, there's the hybrid situation, where you want to borrow some of
|
|
a module's real functionality but stub out other pieces. Obviously, this
|
|
is a pretty strong smell that the other module might be lacking in
|
|
cohesion, but that code might be outside your jurisdiction. The pattern
|
|
here is this:
|
|
|
|
> // Use real versions of parse/unparse
|
|
> var narrow = require('js/narrow.js');
|
|
> set_global('narrow', {
|
|
> parse: narrow.parse,
|
|
> unparse: narrow.unparse
|
|
> });
|
|
>
|
|
> // But later, I want to stub the stream without having to call super-expensive
|
|
> // real code like narrow.activate().
|
|
> global.narrow.stream = function () {
|
|
> return 'office';
|
|
> };
|