mirror of https://github.com/zulip/zulip.git
227 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
227 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
# Markdown implementation
|
|
|
|
Zulip has a special flavor of Markdown, currently called 'bugdown'
|
|
after Zulip's original name of "humbug". End users are using Bugdown
|
|
within the client, not original Markdown.
|
|
|
|
Zulip has two implementations of Bugdown. The backend implementation
|
|
at `zerver/lib/bugdown/` is based on
|
|
[Python-Markdown](https://pythonhosted.org/Markdown/) and is used to
|
|
authoritatively render messages to HTML (and implements
|
|
slow/expensive/complex features like querying the Twitter API to
|
|
render tweets nicely). The frontend implementation is in JavaScript,
|
|
based on [marked.js](https://github.com/chjj/marked)
|
|
(`static/js/echo.js`), and is used to preview and locally echo
|
|
messages the moment the sender hits enter, without waiting for round
|
|
trip from the server. Those frontend renderings are only shown to the
|
|
sender of a message, and they are (ideally) identical to the backend
|
|
rendering.
|
|
|
|
The JavaScript markdown implementation has a function,
|
|
`markdown.contains_backend_only_syntax`, that is used to check whether a message
|
|
contains any syntax that needs to be rendered to HTML on the backend.
|
|
If `markdown.contains_backend_only_syntax` returns true, the frontend simply won't
|
|
echo the message for the sender until it receives the rendered HTML
|
|
from the backend. If there is a bug where `markdown.contains_backend_only_syntax`
|
|
returns false incorrectly, the frontend will discover this when the
|
|
backend returns the newly sent message, and will update the HTML based
|
|
on the authoritative backend rendering (which would cause a change in
|
|
the rendering that is visible only to the sender shortly after a
|
|
message is sent). As a result, we try to make sure that
|
|
`markdown.contains_backend_only_syntax` is always correct.
|
|
|
|
## Testing
|
|
|
|
The Python-Markdown implementation is tested by
|
|
`zerver/tests/test_bugdown.py`, and the marked.js implementation and
|
|
`markdown.contains_backend_only_syntax` are tested by
|
|
`frontend_tests/node_tests/markdown.js`.
|
|
|
|
A shared set of fixed test data ("test fixtures") is present in
|
|
`zerver/fixtures/markdown_test_cases.json`, and is automatically used
|
|
by both test suites; as a result, it the preferred place to add new
|
|
tests for Zulip's markdown system. Some important notes on reading
|
|
this file:
|
|
|
|
* `expected_output` is the expected output for the backend markdown
|
|
processor.
|
|
* When the frontend processor doesn't support a feature and it should
|
|
just be rendered on the backend, we set `backend_only_rendering` to
|
|
`true` in the fixtures; this will automatically verify that
|
|
`markdown.contains_backend_only_syntax` rejects the syntax, ensuring
|
|
it will be rendered only by the backend processor.
|
|
* When the two processors disagree, we set `expected_marked_output` in
|
|
the fixtures; this will ensure that the syntax stays that way. If
|
|
the differenes are important (i.e. not just whitespace), we should
|
|
also open an issue on GitHub to track the problem.
|
|
* When those above settings are not in use, we set
|
|
`bugdown_matches_marked` is the predescessor to the more descriptive
|
|
`backend_only_rendering` and `expected_marked_output` fields, and
|
|
when `false`, should be replaced be one of those. We plan to
|
|
eliminate it once we're out of cases where it is `false`.
|
|
|
|
If you're going to manually test some changes in the frontend Markdown
|
|
implementation, the easiest way to do this is as follows:
|
|
|
|
1. Login to your development server.
|
|
2. Stop your Zulip server with ctrl-C, leaving the browser open.
|
|
3. Compose and send the messages you'd like to test. They will be
|
|
locally echoed using the frontend rendering.
|
|
|
|
This procedure prevents any server-side rendering. If you don't do
|
|
this, backend will likely render the Markdown you're testing and swap
|
|
it in before you can see the frontend's rendering.
|
|
|
|
## Changing Zulip's markdown processor
|
|
|
|
When changing Zulip's markdown syntax, you need to update several
|
|
places:
|
|
|
|
* The backend markdown processor (`zerver/lib/bugdown/__init__.py`).
|
|
* The frontend markdown processor (`static/js/markdown.js` and sometimes
|
|
`static/third/marked/lib/marked.js`), or `markdown.contains_backend_only_syntax` if
|
|
your changes won't be supported in the frontend processor.
|
|
* If desired, the typeahead logic in `static/js/composebox_typeahead.js`.
|
|
* The test suite, probably via adding entries to `zerver/fixtures/markdown_test_cases.json`.
|
|
* The in-app markdown documentation (`templates/zerver/markdown_help.html`).
|
|
* The list of changes to markdown at the end of this document.
|
|
|
|
Important considerations for any changes are:
|
|
|
|
* Security: A bug in the markdown processor can lead to XSS issues.
|
|
For example, we should not insert unsanitized HTML from a
|
|
third-party web application into a Zulip message.
|
|
* Uniqueness: We want to avoid users having a bad experience due to
|
|
accidentally triggering markdown syntax or typeahead that isn't
|
|
related to what they are trying to express.
|
|
* Performance: Zulip can render a lot of messages very quickly, and
|
|
we'd like to keep it that way. New regular expressions similar to
|
|
the ones already present are unlikely to be a problem, but we need
|
|
to be thoughtful about expensive computations or third-party API
|
|
requests.
|
|
* Database: The backend markdown processor runs inside a Python thread
|
|
(as part of how we implement timeouts for third-party API queries),
|
|
and for that reason we currently should avoid making database
|
|
queries inside the markdown processor. This is a technical
|
|
implementation detail that could be changed with a few days of work,
|
|
but is important detail to know about until we do that work.
|
|
* Testing: Every new feature should have both positive and negative
|
|
tests; they're easy to write and give us the flexibility to refactor
|
|
frequently.
|
|
|
|
## Zulip's Markdown philosophy
|
|
|
|
Note that this discussion is based on a comparison with the original
|
|
Markdown, not newer Markdown variants like CommonMark.
|
|
|
|
Markdown is great for group chat for the same reason it's been
|
|
successful in products ranging from blogs to wikis to bug trackers:
|
|
it's close enough to how people try to express themselves when writing
|
|
plain text (e.g. emails) that it helps more than getting in the way.
|
|
|
|
The main issue for using Markdown in instant messaging is that the
|
|
Markdown standard syntax used in a lot of wikis/blogs has nontrivial
|
|
error rates, where the author needs to go back and edit the post to
|
|
fix the formatting after typing it the first time. While that's
|
|
basically fine when writing a blog, it gets annoying very fast in a
|
|
chat product; even though you can edit messages to fix formatting
|
|
mistakes, you don't want to be doing that often. There are basically
|
|
2 types of error rates that are important for a product like Zulip:
|
|
|
|
* What fraction of the time, if you pasted a short technical email
|
|
that you wrote to your team and passed it through your Markdown
|
|
implementation, would you need to change the text of your email for it
|
|
to render in a reasonable way? This is the "accidental Markdown
|
|
syntax" problem, common with Markdown syntax like the italics syntax
|
|
interacting with talking about `char *`s.
|
|
|
|
* What fraction of the time do users attempting to use a particular
|
|
Markdown syntax actually succeed at doing so correctly? Syntax like
|
|
required a blank line between text and the start of a bulleted list
|
|
raise this figure substantially.
|
|
|
|
Both of these are minor issues for most products using Markdown, but
|
|
they are major problems in the instant messaging context, because one
|
|
can't edit a message that has already been sent and users are
|
|
generally writing quickly. Zulip's Markdown strategy is based on the
|
|
principles of giving users the power they need to express complicated
|
|
ideas in a chat context while minimizing those two error rates.
|
|
|
|
## Zulip's Changes to Markdown
|
|
|
|
Below, we document the changes that Zulip has against stock
|
|
Python-Markdown; some of the features we modify / disable may already
|
|
be non-standard.
|
|
|
|
### Basic syntax
|
|
|
|
* Enable `nl2br` extension: this means one newline creates a line
|
|
break (not paragraph break).
|
|
|
|
* Allow only `*` syntax for italics, not `_`. This resolves an issue where
|
|
people were using `_` and hitting it by mistake too often. Asterisks
|
|
surrounded by spaces won't trigger italics, either (e.g. with stock Markdown
|
|
`You should use char * instead of void * there` would produce undesired
|
|
results).
|
|
|
|
* Allow only `**` syntax for bold, not `__` (easy to hit by mistake if
|
|
discussing Python `__init__` or something).
|
|
|
|
* Add `~~` syntax for strikethrough.
|
|
|
|
* Disable special use of `\` to escape other syntax. Rendering `\\` as
|
|
`\` was hugely controversial, but having no escape syntax is also
|
|
controversial. We may revisit this. For now you can always put
|
|
things in code blocks.
|
|
|
|
### Lists
|
|
|
|
* Allow tacking a bulleted list or block quote onto the end of a
|
|
paragraph, i.e. without a blank line before it.
|
|
|
|
* Allow only `*` for bulleted lists, not `+` or `-` (previously
|
|
created confusion with diff-style text sloppily not included in a
|
|
code block).
|
|
|
|
* Disable ordered list syntax: stock Markdown automatically renumbers, which
|
|
can be really confusing when sending a numbered list across multiple
|
|
messages.
|
|
|
|
### Links
|
|
|
|
* Enable auto-linkification, both for `http://...` and guessing at
|
|
things like `t.co/foo`.
|
|
|
|
* Force links to be absolute. `[foo](google.com)` will go to
|
|
`http://google.com`, and not `http://zulip.com/google.com` which
|
|
is the default behavior.
|
|
|
|
* Set `target="_blank"` and `title=`(the url) on every link tag so
|
|
clicking always opens a new window.
|
|
|
|
* Disable link-by-reference syntax,
|
|
`[foo][bar]` ... `[bar]: http://google.com`.
|
|
|
|
* Enable linking to other streams using `#**streamName**`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Code
|
|
|
|
* Enable fenced code block extension, with syntax highlighting.
|
|
|
|
* Disable line-numbering within fenced code blocks -- the `<table>`
|
|
output confused our web client code.
|
|
|
|
### Other
|
|
|
|
* Disable headings, both `# foo` and `== foo ==` syntax: they don't
|
|
make much sense for chat messages.
|
|
|
|
* Disabled images with `![]()` (images from links are shown as an inline
|
|
preview).
|
|
|
|
* Allow embedding any avatar as a tiny (list bullet size) image. This
|
|
is used primarily by version control integrations.
|
|
|
|
* We added the `~~~ quote` block quote syntax.
|