mirror of https://github.com/zulip/zulip.git
516 lines
19 KiB
Markdown
516 lines
19 KiB
Markdown
# Python static type checker (mypy)
|
||
|
||
[mypy](http://mypy-lang.org/) is a compile-time static type checker
|
||
for Python, allowing optional, gradual typing of Python code. Zulip
|
||
was fully annotated with mypy's Python 2 syntax in 2016, before our
|
||
migration to Python 3 in late 2017. In 2018 and 2020, we migrated
|
||
essentially the entire codebase to the nice PEP 484 (Python 3 only)
|
||
and PEP 526 (Python 3.6) syntax for static types:
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
user_dict: Dict[str, UserProfile] = {}
|
||
|
||
def get_user(email: str, realm: Realm) -> UserProfile:
|
||
... # Actual code of the function here
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
You can learn more about it at:
|
||
|
||
* The
|
||
[mypy cheat sheet for Python 3](https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/cheat_sheet_py3.html)
|
||
is the best resource for quickly understanding how to write the PEP
|
||
484 type annotations used by mypy correctly. The
|
||
[Python 2 cheat sheet](https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/cheat_sheet.html)
|
||
is useful for understanding the type comment syntax needed for our
|
||
few modules that need to support both Python 2 and 3.
|
||
|
||
* The
|
||
[Python type annotation spec in PEP 484](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0484/).
|
||
|
||
* Our [blog post on being an early adopter of mypy][mypy-blog-post] from 2016.
|
||
|
||
* Our [best practices](#best-practices) section below.
|
||
|
||
The mypy type checker is run automatically as part of Zulip's Travis
|
||
CI testing process in the `backend` build.
|
||
|
||
[mypy-blog-post]: https://blog.zulip.org/2016/10/13/static-types-in-python-oh-mypy/
|
||
|
||
## Installing mypy
|
||
|
||
mypy is installed by default in the Zulip development environment. If
|
||
you'd like to install just the version of `mypy` that we're using
|
||
(useful if e.g. you want `mypy` installed on your laptop outside the
|
||
Vagrant guest), you can do that with `pip install -r
|
||
requirements/mypy.txt`.
|
||
|
||
## Running mypy on Zulip's code locally
|
||
|
||
To run mypy on Zulip's python code, you can run the command:
|
||
|
||
tools/run-mypy
|
||
|
||
Mypy outputs errors in the same style as a compiler would. For
|
||
example, if your code has a type error like this:
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
foo = 1
|
||
foo = '1'
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
you'll get an error like this:
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
test.py: note: In function "test":
|
||
test.py:200: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "str", variable has type "int")
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Mypy is there to find bugs in Zulip before they impact users
|
||
|
||
For the purposes of Zulip development, you can treat `mypy` like a
|
||
much more powerful linter that can catch a wide range of bugs. If,
|
||
after running `tools/run-mypy` on your Zulip branch, you get mypy
|
||
errors, it's important to get to the bottom of the issue, not just do
|
||
something quick to silence the warnings, before we merge the changes.
|
||
Possible explanations include:
|
||
|
||
* A bug in any new type annotations you added.
|
||
* A bug in the existing type annotations.
|
||
* A bug in Zulip!
|
||
* Some Zulip code is correct but confusingly reuses variables with
|
||
different types.
|
||
* A bug in mypy (though this is increasingly rare as mypy is now
|
||
fairly mature as a project).
|
||
|
||
Each explanation has its own solution, but in every case the result
|
||
should be solving the mypy warning in a way that makes the Zulip
|
||
codebase better. If you're having trouble, silence the warning with
|
||
an `Any` or `# type: ignore[code]` so you're not blocked waiting for help,
|
||
add a `# TODO: ` comment so it doesn't get forgotten in code review,
|
||
and ask for help in chat.zulip.org.
|
||
|
||
## Mypy stubs for third-party modules
|
||
|
||
For the Python standard library and some popular third-party modules,
|
||
the [typeshed project](https://github.com/python/typeshed) has
|
||
[stubs](https://github.com/python/mypy/wiki/Creating-Stubs-For-Python-Modules),
|
||
basically the equivalent of C header files defining the types used in
|
||
these Python APIs.
|
||
|
||
For other third-party modules that we call from Zulip, one either
|
||
needs to add an `ignore_missing_imports` entry in `mypy.ini` in the
|
||
root of the project, letting `mypy` know that it's third-party code,
|
||
or add type stubs to the `stubs/` directory, which has type stubs that
|
||
mypy can use to type-check calls into that third-party module.
|
||
|
||
It's easy to add new stubs! Just read the docs, look at some of
|
||
existing examples to see how they work, and remember to remove the
|
||
`ignore_missing_imports` entry in `mypy.ini` when you add them.
|
||
|
||
For any third-party modules that don't have stubs, `mypy` treats
|
||
everything in the third-party module as an `Any`, which is the right
|
||
model (one certainly wouldn't want to need stubs for everything just
|
||
to use `mypy`!), but means the code can't be fully type-checked.
|
||
|
||
## `type_debug.py`
|
||
|
||
`zerver/lib/type_debug.py` has a useful decorator `print_types`. It
|
||
prints the types of the parameters of the decorated function and the
|
||
return type whenever that function is called. This can help find out
|
||
what parameter types a function is supposed to accept, or if
|
||
parameters with the wrong types are being passed to a function.
|
||
|
||
Here is an example using the interactive console:
|
||
|
||
```pycon
|
||
>>> from zerver.lib.type_debug import print_types
|
||
>>>
|
||
>>> @print_types
|
||
... def func(x, y):
|
||
... return x + y
|
||
...
|
||
>>> func(1.0, 2)
|
||
func(float, int) -> float
|
||
3.0
|
||
>>> func('a', 'b')
|
||
func(str, str) -> str
|
||
'ab'
|
||
>>> func((1, 2), (3,))
|
||
func((int, int), (int,)) -> (int, int, int)
|
||
(1, 2, 3)
|
||
>>> func([1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6, 7])
|
||
func([int, ...], [int, ...]) -> [int, ...]
|
||
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
`print_all` prints the type of the first item of lists. So `[int, ...]` represents
|
||
a list whose first element's type is `int`. Types of all items are not printed
|
||
because a list can have many elements, which would make the output too large.
|
||
|
||
Similarly in dicts, one key's type and the corresponding value's type are printed.
|
||
So `{1: 'a', 2: 'b', 3: 'c'}` will be printed as `{int: str, ...}`.
|
||
|
||
## Using @overload to accurately describe variations
|
||
|
||
Sometimes, a function's type is most precisely expressed as a few
|
||
possibilities, and which possibility can be determined by looking at
|
||
the arguments. You can express that idea in a way mypy understands
|
||
using `@overload`. For example, `check_list` returns a `Validator`
|
||
function that verifies that an object is a list, raising an exception
|
||
if it isn't.
|
||
|
||
It supports being passed a `sub_validator`, which will verify that
|
||
each element in the list has a given type as well. One can express
|
||
the idea "If `sub_validator` validates that something is a `ResultT`,
|
||
`check_list(sub_validator)` validators that something is a
|
||
`List[ResultT]` as follows:
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
@overload
|
||
def check_list(sub_validator: None, length: Optional[int]=None) -> Validator[List[object]]:
|
||
...
|
||
@overload
|
||
def check_list(sub_validator: Validator[ResultT],
|
||
length: Optional[int]=None) -> Validator[List[ResultT]]:
|
||
...
|
||
def check_list(sub_validator: Optional[Validator[ResultT]]=None,
|
||
length: Optional[int]=None) -> Validator[List[ResultT]]:
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
The first overload expresses the types for the case where no
|
||
`sub_validator` is passed, in which case all we know is that it
|
||
returns a `Validator[List[object]]`; whereas the second defines the
|
||
type logic for the case where we are passed a `sub_validator`.
|
||
|
||
**Warning:** Mypy only checks the body of an overloaded function
|
||
against the final signature and not against the more restrictive
|
||
`@overload` signatures. This allows some type errors to evade
|
||
detection by mypy:
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
@overload
|
||
def f(x: int) -> int: ...
|
||
@overload
|
||
def f(x: str) -> int: ... # oops
|
||
def f(x: Union[int, str]) -> Union[int, str]:
|
||
return x
|
||
|
||
x: int = f("three!!")
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Due to this potential for unsafety, we discourage overloading unless
|
||
it's absolutely necessary. Consider writing multiple functions with
|
||
different names instead.
|
||
|
||
See the [mypy overloading documentation][mypy-overloads] for more details.
|
||
|
||
[mypy-overloads]: https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/more_types.html#function-overloading
|
||
|
||
## Best practices
|
||
|
||
### When is a type annotation justified?
|
||
|
||
Usually in fully typed code, mypy will protect you from writing a type
|
||
annotation that isn't justified by the surrounding code. But when you
|
||
need to write annotations at the border between untyped and typed
|
||
code, keep in mind that **a type annotation should always represent a
|
||
guarantee,** not an aspiration. If you have validated that some value
|
||
is an `int`, it can go in an `int` annotated variable. If you are
|
||
going to validate it later, it should not. When in doubt, an `object`
|
||
annotation is always safe.
|
||
|
||
Mypy understands many Python constructs like `assert`, `if`,
|
||
`isinstance`, and logical operators, and uses them to automatically
|
||
narrow the type of validated objects in many cases.
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
def f(x: object, y: Optional[str]) -> None:
|
||
if isinstance(x, int):
|
||
# Within this if block, mypy infers that x: int
|
||
print(x + 1)
|
||
assert y is not None
|
||
# After that assert statement, mypy infers that y: str
|
||
print(y.strip())
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
It won't be able do this narrowing if the validation is hidden behind
|
||
a function call, so sometimes it's helpful for a validation function
|
||
to return the type-narrowed value back to the caller even though the
|
||
caller already has it. (The validators in `zerver/lib/validator.py`
|
||
are examples of this pattern.)
|
||
|
||
### Avoid the `Any` type
|
||
|
||
Mypy provides the [`Any`
|
||
type](https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/dynamic_typing.html) for
|
||
interoperability with untyped code, but it is completely unchecked.
|
||
You can put an value of an arbitrary type into an expression of type
|
||
`Any`, and get an value of an arbitrary type out, and mypy will make
|
||
no effort to check that the input and output types match. So using
|
||
`Any` defeats the type safety that mypy would otherwise provide.
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
x: Any = 5
|
||
y: str = x # oops
|
||
print(y.strip()) # runtime error
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
If you think you need to use `Any`, consider the following safer
|
||
alternatives first:
|
||
|
||
* To annotate a dictionary where different keys correspond to values
|
||
of different types, instead of writing `Dict[str, Any]`, try
|
||
declaring a
|
||
[**`dataclass`**](https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/additional_features.html#dataclasses)
|
||
or a
|
||
[**`TypedDict`**](https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/more_types.html#typeddict).
|
||
|
||
* If you're annotating a class or function that might be used with
|
||
different data types at different call sites, similar to the builtin
|
||
`List` type or the `sorted` function, [**generic
|
||
types**](https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/generics.html) with
|
||
`TypeVar` might be what you need.
|
||
|
||
* If you need to accept data of several specific possible types at a
|
||
single site, you may want a [**`Union`
|
||
type**](https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/kinds_of_types.html#union-types).
|
||
`Union` is checked: before using `value: Union[str, int]` as a
|
||
`str`, mypy requires that you validate it with an `instance(value,
|
||
str)` test.
|
||
|
||
* If you really have no information about the type of a value, use the
|
||
**`object` type**. Since every type is a subtype of `object`, you
|
||
can correctly annotate any value as `object`. The [difference
|
||
between `Any` and
|
||
`object`](https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/dynamic_typing.html#any-vs-object)
|
||
is that mypy will check that you safely validate an `object` with
|
||
`isinstance` before using it in a way that expects a more specific
|
||
type.
|
||
|
||
* A common way for `Any` annotations to sneak into your code is the
|
||
interaction with untyped third-party libraries. Mypy treats any
|
||
value imported from an untyped library as annotated with `Any`, and
|
||
treats any type imported from an untyped library as equivalent to
|
||
`Any`. Consider providing real type annotations for the library by
|
||
[**writing a stub file**](#mypy-stubs-for-third-party-modules).
|
||
|
||
### Avoid `cast()`
|
||
|
||
The [`cast`
|
||
function](https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/casts.html) lets you
|
||
provide an annotation that Mypy will not verify. Obviously, this is
|
||
completely unsafe in general.
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
x = cast(str, 5) # oops
|
||
print(x.strip()) # runtime error
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Instead of using `cast`:
|
||
|
||
* You can use a [variable
|
||
annotation](https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/type_inference_and_annotations.html#explicit-types-for-variables)
|
||
to be explicit or to disambiguate types that mypy can check but
|
||
cannot infer.
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
l: List[int] = []
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
* You can use an [`isinstance`
|
||
test](https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/common_issues.html#complex-type-tests)
|
||
to safely verify that a value really has the type you expect.
|
||
|
||
### Avoid `# type: ignore` comments
|
||
|
||
Mypy allows you to ignore any type checking error with a [`# type:
|
||
ignore`
|
||
comment](https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/common_issues.html#spurious-errors-and-locally-silencing-the-checker),
|
||
but you should avoid this in the absence of a very good reason, such
|
||
as a bug in mypy itself. If there are no safe options for dealing
|
||
with the error, prefer an unchecked `cast`, since its unsafety is
|
||
somewhat more localized.
|
||
|
||
Our linter requires all `# type: ignore` comments to be [scoped to the
|
||
specific error
|
||
code](https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/error_codes.html) being
|
||
ignored, and followed by an explanation such as a link to a GitHub
|
||
issue.
|
||
|
||
### Avoid other unchecked constructs
|
||
|
||
* As mentioned
|
||
[above](#using-overload-to-accurately-describe-variations), we
|
||
**discourage writing overloaded functions** because their bodies are
|
||
not checked against the `@overload` signatures.
|
||
|
||
* **Avoid `Callable[..., T]`** (with literal ellipsis `...`), since
|
||
mypy cannot check the types of arguments passed to it. Provide the
|
||
specific argument types (`Callable[[int, str], T]`) in simple cases,
|
||
or use [callback
|
||
protocols](https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/protocols.html#callback-protocols)
|
||
in more complex cases.
|
||
|
||
### Use `Optional` and `None` correctly
|
||
|
||
The [`Optional`
|
||
type](https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/cheat_sheet_py3.html#built-in-types)
|
||
is for optional values, which are values that could be `None`. For
|
||
example, `Optional[int]` is equivalent to `Union[int, None]`.
|
||
|
||
The `Optional` type is **not for optional parameters** (unless they
|
||
are also optional values as above). This signature does not use the
|
||
`Optional` type:
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
def func(flag: bool = False) -> str:
|
||
...
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
A collection such as `List` should only be `Optional` if `None` would
|
||
have a different meaning than the natural meaning of an empty
|
||
collection. For example:
|
||
|
||
* An include list where the default is to include everything should be
|
||
`Optional` with default `None`.
|
||
* An exclude list where the default is to exclude nothing should be
|
||
non-`Optional` with default `[]`.
|
||
|
||
Don't test an `Optional` value using truthiness (`if value:`, `not
|
||
value`, `value or default_value`), especially when the type might have
|
||
falsy values other than `None`.
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
s: Optional[str]
|
||
if not s: # bad: are we checking for None or ""?
|
||
...
|
||
if s is None: # good
|
||
...
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Read-only types
|
||
|
||
The basic Python collections
|
||
[`List`](https://docs.python.org/3/library/typing.html#typing.List),
|
||
[`Dict`](https://docs.python.org/3/library/typing.html#typing.Dict),
|
||
and [`Set`](https://docs.python.org/3/library/typing.html#typing.Set)
|
||
are mutable, but it's confusing for a function to mutate a collection
|
||
that was passed to it as an argument, especially by accident. To
|
||
avoid this, prefer annotating function parameters with read-only
|
||
types:
|
||
|
||
* [`Sequence`](https://docs.python.org/3/library/typing.html#typing.Sequence)
|
||
instead of `List`,
|
||
* [`Mapping`](https://docs.python.org/3/library/typing.html#typing.Mapping)
|
||
instead of `Dict`,
|
||
* [`AbstractSet`](https://docs.python.org/3/library/typing.html#typing.AbstractSet)
|
||
instead of `Set`.
|
||
|
||
This is especially important for parameters with default arguments,
|
||
since a mutable default argument is confusingly shared between all
|
||
calls to the function.
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
def f(items: Sequence[int] = []) -> int:
|
||
items.append(1) # mypy catches this mistake
|
||
return sum(items)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
In some cases the more general
|
||
[`Collection`](https://docs.python.org/3/library/typing.html#typing.Collection)
|
||
or
|
||
[`Iterable`](https://docs.python.org/3/library/typing.html#typing.Iterable)
|
||
types might be appropriate. (But don’t use `Iterable` for a value
|
||
that might be iterated multiple times, since a one-use iterator is
|
||
`Iterable` too.)
|
||
|
||
A function's return type can be mutable if the return value is always
|
||
a freshly created collection, since the caller ends up with the only
|
||
reference to the value and can freely mutate it without risk of
|
||
confusion. But a read-only return type might be more appropriate for
|
||
a function that returns a reference to an existing collection.
|
||
|
||
Read-only types have the additional advantage of being [covariant
|
||
rather than
|
||
invariant](https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/common_issues.html#invariance-vs-covariance):
|
||
if `B` is a subtype of `A`, then `List[B]` may not be converted to
|
||
`List[A]`, but `Sequence[B]` may be converted to `Sequence[A]`.
|
||
|
||
### Typing decorators
|
||
|
||
A simple decorator that operates on functions of a fixed signature
|
||
works with no issues:
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
def fancy(func: Callable[[str], str]) -> Callable[[int], str]:
|
||
def wrapped_func(n: int) -> str:
|
||
print("so fancy")
|
||
return func(str(n))
|
||
return wrapped_func
|
||
|
||
@fancy
|
||
def f(s: str) -> str:
|
||
return s
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
A decorator with an argument also works:
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
def fancy(message: str) -> Callable[[Callable[[str], str]], Callable[[int], str]]:
|
||
def wrapper(func: Callable[[str], str]) -> Callable[[int], str]:
|
||
def wrapped_func(n: int) -> str:
|
||
print(message)
|
||
return func(str(n))
|
||
return wrapped_func
|
||
return wrapper
|
||
|
||
@fancy("so fancy")
|
||
def f(s: str) -> str:
|
||
return s
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
And a [generic
|
||
decorator](https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/generics.html#declaring-decorators)
|
||
that operates on functions of arbitrary signatures can be written
|
||
[with a `cast`](https://github.com/python/mypy/issues/1927) if the
|
||
output signature is always the same as the input signature:
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
FuncT = TypeVar("FuncT", bound=Callable[..., object])
|
||
|
||
def fancy(func: FuncT) -> FuncT:
|
||
def wrapped_func(*args: object, **kwargs: object) -> object:
|
||
print("so fancy")
|
||
return func(*args, **kwargs)
|
||
return cast(FuncT, wrapped_func) # https://github.com/python/mypy/issues/1927
|
||
|
||
@fancy
|
||
def f(s: str) -> str:
|
||
return s
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
(A generic decorator with an argument would return `Callable[[FuncT],
|
||
FuncT]`.)
|
||
|
||
But Mypy doesn't yet support the advanced type annotations that would
|
||
be needed to correctly type generic signature-changing decorators,
|
||
such as `zerver.decorator.authenticated_json_view`, which passes an
|
||
extra argument to the inner function. For these decorators we must
|
||
unfortunately give up some type safety by falling back to
|
||
`Callable[..., T]`.
|
||
|
||
## Troubleshooting advice
|
||
|
||
All of our linters, including mypy, are designed to only check files
|
||
that have been added in git (this is by design, since it means you
|
||
have untracked files in your Zulip checkout safely). So if you get a
|
||
`mypy` error like this after adding a new file that is referenced by
|
||
the existing codebase:
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
mypy | zerver/models.py:1234: note: Import of 'zerver.lib.markdown_wrappers' ignored
|
||
mypy | zerver/models.py:1234: note: (Using --follow-imports=error, module not passed on command line)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
The problem is that you need to `git add` the new file.
|