18 KiB
Python static type checker (mypy)
mypy is a compile-time static type checker for Python, allowing optional, gradual typing of Python code. Zulip was fully annotated with mypy's Python 2 syntax in 2016, before our migration to Python 3 in late 2017. In 2018 and 2020, we migrated essentially the entire codebase to the nice PEP 484 (Python 3 only) and PEP 526 (Python 3.6) syntax for static types:
user_dict: Dict[str, UserProfile] = {}
def get_user(email: str, realm: Realm) -> UserProfile:
... # Actual code of the function here
You can learn more about it at:
-
The mypy cheat sheet for Python 3 is the best resource for quickly understanding how to write the PEP 484 type annotations used by mypy correctly. The Python 2 cheat sheet is useful for understanding the type comment syntax needed for our few modules that need to support both Python 2 and 3.
-
Our blog post on being an early adopter of mypy from 2016.
-
Our best practices section below.
The mypy type checker is run automatically as part of Zulip's Travis
CI testing process in the backend
build.
Installing mypy
mypy is installed by default in the Zulip development environment. If
you'd like to install just the version of mypy
that we're using
(useful if e.g. you want mypy
installed on your laptop outside the
Vagrant guest), you can do that with pip install -r requirements/mypy.txt
.
Running mypy on Zulip's code locally
To run mypy on Zulip's python code, you can run the command:
tools/run-mypy
Mypy outputs errors in the same style as a compiler would. For example, if your code has a type error like this:
foo = 1
foo = '1'
you'll get an error like this:
test.py: note: In function "test":
test.py:200: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "str", variable has type "int")
Mypy is there to find bugs in Zulip before they impact users
For the purposes of Zulip development, you can treat mypy
like a
much more powerful linter that can catch a wide range of bugs. If,
after running tools/run-mypy
on your Zulip branch, you get mypy
errors, it's important to get to the bottom of the issue, not just do
something quick to silence the warnings, before we merge the changes.
Possible explanations include:
- A bug in any new type annotations you added.
- A bug in the existing type annotations.
- A bug in Zulip!
- Some Zulip code is correct but confusingly reuses variables with different types.
- A bug in mypy (though this is increasingly rare as mypy is now fairly mature as a project).
Each explanation has its own solution, but in every case the result
should be solving the mypy warning in a way that makes the Zulip
codebase better. If you're having trouble, silence the warning with
an Any
or # type: ignore[code]
so you're not blocked waiting for help,
add a # TODO:
comment so it doesn't get forgotten in code review,
and ask for help in chat.zulip.org.
Mypy stubs for third-party modules
For the Python standard library and some popular third-party modules, the typeshed project has stubs, basically the equivalent of C header files defining the types used in these Python APIs.
For other third-party modules that we call from Zulip, one either
needs to add an ignore_missing_imports
entry in mypy.ini
in the
root of the project, letting mypy
know that it's third-party code,
or add type stubs to the stubs/
directory, which has type stubs that
mypy can use to type-check calls into that third-party module.
It's easy to add new stubs! Just read the docs, look at some of
existing examples to see how they work, and remember to remove the
ignore_missing_imports
entry in mypy.ini
when you add them.
For any third-party modules that don't have stubs, mypy
treats
everything in the third-party module as an Any
, which is the right
model (one certainly wouldn't want to need stubs for everything just
to use mypy
!), but means the code can't be fully type-checked.
type_debug.py
zerver/lib/type_debug.py
has a useful decorator print_types
. It
prints the types of the parameters of the decorated function and the
return type whenever that function is called. This can help find out
what parameter types a function is supposed to accept, or if
parameters with the wrong types are being passed to a function.
Here is an example using the interactive console:
>>> from zerver.lib.type_debug import print_types
>>>
>>> @print_types
... def func(x, y):
... return x + y
...
>>> func(1.0, 2)
func(float, int) -> float
3.0
>>> func('a', 'b')
func(str, str) -> str
'ab'
>>> func((1, 2), (3,))
func((int, int), (int,)) -> (int, int, int)
(1, 2, 3)
>>> func([1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6, 7])
func([int, ...], [int, ...]) -> [int, ...]
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
print_all
prints the type of the first item of lists. So [int, ...]
represents
a list whose first element's type is int
. Types of all items are not printed
because a list can have many elements, which would make the output too large.
Similarly in dicts, one key's type and the corresponding value's type are printed.
So {1: 'a', 2: 'b', 3: 'c'}
will be printed as {int: str, ...}
.
Using @overload to accurately describe variations
Sometimes, a function's type is most precisely expressed as a few
possibilities, and which possibility can be determined by looking at
the arguments. You can express that idea in a way mypy understands
using @overload
. For example, check_list
returns a Validator
function that verifies that an object is a list, raising an exception
if it isn't.
It supports being passed a sub_validator
, which will verify that
each element in the list has a given type as well. One can express
the idea "If sub_validator
validates that something is a ResultT
,
check_list(sub_validator)
validators that something is a
List[ResultT]
as follows:
@overload
def check_list(sub_validator: None, length: Optional[int]=None) -> Validator[List[object]]:
...
@overload
def check_list(sub_validator: Validator[ResultT],
length: Optional[int]=None) -> Validator[List[ResultT]]:
...
def check_list(sub_validator: Optional[Validator[ResultT]]=None,
length: Optional[int]=None) -> Validator[List[ResultT]]:
The first overload expresses the types for the case where no
sub_validator
is passed, in which case all we know is that it
returns a Validator[List[object]]
; whereas the second defines the
type logic for the case where we are passed a sub_validator
.
Warning: Mypy only checks the body of an overloaded function
against the final signature and not against the more restrictive
@overload
signatures. This allows some type errors to evade
detection by mypy:
@overload
def f(x: int) -> int: ...
@overload
def f(x: str) -> int: ... # oops
def f(x: Union[int, str]) -> Union[int, str]:
return x
x: int = f("three!!")
Due to this potential for unsafety, we discourage overloading unless it's absolutely necessary. Consider writing multiple functions with different names instead.
See the mypy overloading documentation for more details.
Best practices
When is a type annotation justified?
Usually in fully typed code, mypy will protect you from writing a type
annotation that isn't justified by the surrounding code. But when you
need to write annotations at the border between untyped and typed
code, keep in mind that a type annotation should always represent a
guarantee, not an aspiration. If you have validated that some value
is an int
, it can go in an int
annotated variable. If you are
going to validate it later, it should not. When in doubt, an object
annotation is always safe.
Mypy understands many Python constructs like assert
, if
,
isinstance
, and logical operators, and uses them to automatically
narrow the type of validated objects in many cases.
def f(x: object, y: Optional[str]) -> None:
if isinstance(x, int):
# Within this if block, mypy infers that x: int
print(x + 1)
assert y is not None
# After that assert statement, mypy infers that y: str
print(y.strip())
It won't be able do this narrowing if the validation is hidden behind
a function call, so sometimes it's helpful for a validation function
to return the type-narrowed value back to the caller even though the
caller already has it. (The validators in zerver/lib/validator.py
are examples of this pattern.)
Avoid the Any
type
Mypy provides the Any
type for
interoperability with untyped code, but it is completely unchecked.
You can put an value of an arbitrary type into an expression of type
Any
, and get an value of an arbitrary type out, and mypy will make
no effort to check that the input and output types match. So using
Any
defeats the type safety that mypy would otherwise provide.
x: Any = 5
y: str = x # oops
print(y.strip()) # runtime error
If you think you need to use Any
, consider the following safer
alternatives first:
-
To annotate a dictionary where different keys correspond to values of different types, instead of writing
Dict[str, Any]
, try declaring adataclass
or aTypedDict
. -
If you're annotating a class or function that might be used with different data types at different call sites, similar to the builtin
List
type or thesorted
function, generic types withTypeVar
might be what you need. -
If you need to accept data of several specific possible types at a single site, you may want a
Union
type.Union
is checked: before usingvalue: Union[str, int]
as astr
, mypy requires that you validate it with aninstance(value, str)
test. -
If you really have no information about the type of a value, use the
object
type. Since every type is a subtype ofobject
, you can correctly annotate any value asobject
. The difference betweenAny
andobject
is that mypy will check that you safely validate anobject
withisinstance
before using it in a way that expects a more specific type. -
A common way for
Any
annotations to sneak into your code is the interaction with untyped third-party libraries. Mypy treats any value imported from an untyped library as annotated withAny
, and treats any type imported from an untyped library as equivalent toAny
. Consider providing real type annotations for the library by writing a stub file.
Avoid cast()
The cast
function lets you
provide an annotation that Mypy will not verify. Obviously, this is
completely unsafe in general.
x = cast(str, 5) # oops
print(x.strip()) # runtime error
Instead of using cast
:
-
You can use a variable annotation to be explicit or to disambiguate types that mypy can check but cannot infer.
l: List[int] = []
-
You can use an
isinstance
test to safely verify that a value really has the type you expect.
Avoid # type: ignore
comments
Mypy allows you to ignore any type checking error with a # type: ignore
comment,
but you should avoid this in the absence of a very good reason, such
as a bug in mypy itself. If there are no safe options for dealing
with the error, prefer an unchecked cast
, since its unsafety is
somewhat more localized.
Our linter requires all # type: ignore
comments to be scoped to the
specific error
code being
ignored, and followed by an explanation such as a link to a GitHub
issue.
Avoid other unchecked constructs
-
As mentioned above, we discourage writing overloaded functions because their bodies are not checked against the
@overload
signatures. -
Avoid
Callable[..., T]
(with literal ellipsis...
), since mypy cannot check the types of arguments passed to it. Provide the specific argument types (Callable[[int, str], T]
) in simple cases, or use callback protocols in more complex cases.
Use Optional
and None
correctly
The Optional
type
is for optional values, which are values that could be None
. For
example, Optional[int]
is equivalent to Union[int, None]
.
The Optional
type is not for optional parameters (unless they
are also optional values as above). This signature does not use the
Optional
type:
def func(flag: bool = False) -> str:
...
A collection such as List
should only be Optional
if None
would
have a different meaning than the natural meaning of an empty
collection. For example:
- An include list where the default is to include everything should be
Optional
with defaultNone
. - An exclude list where the default is to exclude nothing should be
non-
Optional
with default[]
.
Don't test an Optional
value using truthiness (if value:
or if not value:
), especially when the type might have falsy values other
than None
.
s: Optional[str]
if not s: # bad: are we checking for None or ""?
...
if s is None: # good
...
Read-only types
The basic Python collections List
, Dict
, and Set
are mutable,
but it's confusing for a function to mutate a collection that was
passed to it as an argument, especially by accident. To avoid this,
prefer annotating function parameters with read-only types:
Sequence
orIterable
instead ofList
,Mapping
instead ofDict
,AbstractSet
instead ofSet
.
This is especially important for parameters with default arguments, since a mutable default argument is confusingly shared between all calls to the function.
def f(items: Sequence[int] = []) -> int:
items.append(1) # mypy catches this mistake
return sum(items)
A function's return type can be mutable if the return value is always a freshly created collection, since the caller ends up with the only reference to the value and can freely mutate it without risk of confusion. But a read-only return type might be more appropriate for a function that returns a reference to an existing collection.
Read-only types have the additional advantage of being covariant
rather than
invariant:
if B
is a subtype of A
, then List[B]
may not be converted to
List[A]
, but Sequence[B]
may be converted to Sequence[A]
.
Typing decorators
A simple decorator that operates on functions of a fixed signature works with no issues:
def fancy(func: Callable[[str], str]) -> Callable[[int], str]:
def wrapped_func(n: int) -> str:
print("so fancy")
return func(str(n))
return wrapped_func
@fancy
def f(s: str) -> str:
return s
A decorator with an argument also works:
def fancy(message: str) -> Callable[[Callable[[str], str]], Callable[[int], str]]:
def wrapper(func: Callable[[str], str]) -> Callable[[int], str]:
def wrapped_func(n: int) -> str:
print(message)
return func(str(n))
return wrapped_func
return wrapper
@fancy("so fancy")
def f(s: str) -> str:
return s
And a generic
decorator
that operates on functions of arbitrary signatures can be written
with a cast
if the
output signature is always the same as the input signature:
FuncT = TypeVar("FuncT", bound=Callable[..., object])
def fancy(func: FuncT) -> FuncT:
def wrapped_func(*args: object, **kwargs: object) -> object:
print("so fancy")
return func(*args, **kwargs)
return cast(FuncT, wrapped_func) # https://github.com/python/mypy/issues/1927
@fancy
def f(s: str) -> str:
return s
(A generic decorator with an argument would return Callable[[FuncT], FuncT]
.)
But Mypy doesn't yet support the advanced type annotations that would
be needed to correctly type generic signature-changing decorators,
such as zerver.decorator.authenticated_json_view
, which passes an
extra argument to the inner function. For these decorators we must
unfortunately give up some type safety by falling back to
Callable[..., T]
.
Troubleshooting advice
All of our linters, including mypy, are designed to only check files
that have been added in git (this is by design, since it means you
have untracked files in your Zulip checkout safely). So if you get a
mypy
error like this after adding a new file that is referenced by
the existing codebase:
mypy | zerver/models.py:1234: note: Import of 'zerver.lib.markdown_wrappers' ignored
mypy | zerver/models.py:1234: note: (Using --follow-imports=error, module not passed on command line)
The problem is that you need to git add
the new file.