ES and TypeScript modules are strict by default and don’t need this
directive. ESLint will remind us to add it to new CommonJS files and
remove it from ES and TypeScript modules.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Prior to commit eb4a2b9d4e the center
area of the navbar was based on a structure that appended crumbs or
"tabs" as <li>s, forming a tab_bar and a tab_list.
However, in eb4a2b9d4e we apply a new
style and structure to the navbar which lets go of the convention of
tabs. Hence, we'd like to purge the tab_bar and tab_list labels from
our code base.
We purged tab_list in 1267caf5009118875f47fdafe312880af08024e1.
This commit purges tab_bar, it includes:
- A blanket search and replace of tab_bar with message_view_header.
- Splitting a single line comment in
tab_bar.js / message_view_header.js.
- The renaming of tab_bar.js to message_view_header.js.
- The renaming of tab_bar.hbs to message_view_header.hbs.
- A blanket search and replace of tab_data with
message_view_header_data.
- Replacing the single occurrence of tabbar with message_view_header
(it was within a comment.)
We should not allow every function who wants to narrow to All
messages to come up with their own method to do so. This
commit makes existing such functions use hashchange library to
do so.
Remove click event on All message button, it already contains
an <a> tag which navigates correctly.
Prettier would do this anyway, but it’s separated out for a more
reviewable diff. Generated by ESLint.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Prettier would do this anyway, but it’s separated out for a more
reviewable diff. Generated by ESLint.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Prettier would do this anyway, but it’s separated out for a more
reviewable diff. Generated by ESLint.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Prettier would do this anyway, but it’s separated out for a more
reviewable diff. Generated by ESLint.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
We refactor these 2 notices to match with the loading indicators,
thus they have been moved to `message_scroll.js`.
After a successful message fetch, we have logic to decide whether
we want to display the notices and also whether we want to hide
the loading indicators (which are already displayed).
We also conservatively hide the notices similar to the indicators
every time we narrow.
The only exception is that we show the history limit notice on
deactivating the narrow (visiting `home_msg_list`).
This commit makes the `loading_older_messages_indicator` similar
to the `loading_newer_messages_indicator`.
Now all the decisions about whether to show a loading indicator
will be made from the `fetch_status` API. We still hide the
indicators everytime the view is changed, as explained in the
previous commit.
As explained in 67053ff479,
multiple message fetches may be taking place at the same time.
So some other narrows / the home message list's indicator might
get shown for the current narrow.
This commit moves the updation of the indicators display logic
to the `fetch_status` API.
Now the `loading_newer_messages_indicator` gets displayed along
with the `loading_newer` = true updation for that narrow's message
list, i.e. just before we send the API request. But only if the
message list we are fetching matches with our current message list.
The same indicator is hidden similarly, along with the
`loading_older` = false updation for that narrow's message list,
i.e. just after the success response is recieved. But only if
the message list whose data we recieved matches with our current
message list.
Also the indicators are hidden everytime we activate narrow
or deactivate narrow (`home_msg_list`). And on entering
`narrow.activate` we fetch for it's messages so they get
displayed again, if need be.
This is the reason `message_scroll.hide_indicators();` was
moved to a location above `fetch_messages`.
Fixes#15374.
The changes made here are as follows:
* We rename `show_history_limit_message` and `hide_history_limit_message`
to `show_history_limit_notice` and `hide_history_limit_notice`
respectively.
* We rename `hide_or_show_history_limit_message` to
`update_top_of_narrow_notices` as now this function is responsible
for updating the history limit notice as well the end of results
notice.
* We extract 2 functions responsible for hiding and showing the end
of results notice, similar to that of the history limit notice.
All instances of `$(".all-messages-search-caution").hide();` are
replaced with the call of `hide_end_of_results_notice` function.
The streams:all advertisement notice in search should only appear
after all results have been fetched to indicate we've gotten to the
beginning of the target feed.
The notice gets hidden at the start of `narrow.activate` and is
shown just after we've fetched an older batch of messages if the
"oldest" message has been found.
Previously it would get displayed after the first fetch which
takes place from `narrow.activate`. Thus we move this logic to
`notifications.hide_or_show_history_limit_message` which gets
called after a successful message fetch.
Since the home message view contains all the messages we are not
required to display this notice. However if it is already shown
we hide it as a part of `handle_post_narrow_deactivate_processes`.
To accomplish this we need to add `has_found_oldest` key to the
`fetch_status` API.
We also removed the `pre_scroll_cont` parameter as this was it's
only use case and is now redundant.
Before 77a26d41ae, there was only one
loading indicator (at the top of the page), so the if/else logic for
hiding loading indicators was correct, if confusing. Since we've now
added a new bottom-of-page loading indicator, it's important to have
the logic correctly reset the state to hide all existing loading
indicators on narrowing, and then just render the ones needed/desired
by the current view.
Combined with similar code in `narrow.deactivate`, this achieves the
goal that we correctly update loading indicator state when switcing
views.
Previously, the navbar failed at managing the searchbox text state in
cases where, eg, the user performs navigation by browser history.
This commit resolves the issue by ensuring that the searchbox text is
only (and always) set when the searchbox is made visible, and as such
there is no "state" to manage and we will always display the correct
text.
It also adds a test in `search_legacy.js` to make sure that the search
text is placed as intended.
Fixes: #14771.
The reason for this change is that, this is where `Filter` and
actual tracking of what messages are contiguous lives. This
will be beneficial when we will to move to a model where we
cache `MessageListData` objects for a large number of views.
When switching from Private Messages narrow to
All messages narrow, stream list max-height was not
correctly updated. Stream list max-height was calculated
before new height were updated by browser for
All message narrow.
Inshort:
Stream list max-height was being updated before the browser could
render height for `#global_filters`. Calling resize after narrow
completes removes this issue.
As long as the current narrow isn't already a search narrow or empty,
we add a single space at the end of the current filter so that the
user can just press the right arrow key and begin typing their search
term, instead of having to add a space themselves.
`stream_topic_history` is a more appropriate name as this
module will contain information about last message of a
stream in upcoming commits. Function and variable names
are changed accordingly like:
* topic_history() -> per_stream_history()
* get_recent_names() -> get_recent_topic_names()
* name -> topic_name
We fix this by adding a more expressive data function, with tests, for
whether a filter is on UserMessage data, which would mean that
streams:public could never add additional matches.
We simplify the code for deciding whether
we show a subscribe button or not, and in
doing so avoid a blueslip error where we
were passing `undefined` into `get_sub()`.
If you were in the "Starred messages" narrow and
your pointer was on a message with the stream/topic
of "social/lunch", we wouldn't move you to the unread
messages for that topic.
I fixed this by removing the code that looked at
the current message's topic. Instead, we only look
at the active narrow to figure out the "next" topic
to go to.
Fixes#14120.
This is not always a behavior-preserving translation: _.defaults
mutates its first argument. However, the code does not always appear
to have been written to expect that.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
We now treat util like a leaf module and
use "require" to import it everywhere it's used.
An earlier version of this commit moved
util into our "shared" library, but we
decided to wait on that. Once we're ready
to do that, we should only need to do a
simple search/replace on various
require/zrequire statements plus a small
tweak to one of the custom linter checks.
It turns out we don't really need util.js
for our most immediate code-sharing goal,
which is to reuse our markdown code on
mobile. There's a little bit of cleanup
still remaining to break the dependency,
but it's minor.
The util module still calls the global
blueslip module in one place, but that
code is about to be removed in the next
few commits.
I am pretty confident that once we start
sharing things like the typeahead code
more aggressively, we'll start having
dependencies on util. The module is barely
more than 300 lines long, so we'll probably
just move the whole thing into shared
rather than break it apart. Also, we
can continue to nibble away at the
cruftier parts of the module.
Now that we have the type situation of having anchor support passing a
string, this is a much more natural way to implement
use_first_unread_anchor.
We still support the old interface to avoid breaking compatibility
with legacy versions of the mobile apps.
This makes the code more readable, by just passing the anchor through
without changing its field name back and forth.
There's no reason for this parameter to involve parsing and integer --
it should be a number in all incoming code paths.
The streams:all adveritsement notice in search should only appear
after we've already received the response from the server, to avoid a
mix of problems ranging from misplaced loading indicator to scrolling
issues to the notice just being distracting while you're waiting for
the server to return results.
We need to add a pre_scroll_cont parameter to the message_fetch API,
since adding this notice would otherwise potentially throw off the
scroll positioning logic for which message to select.
Fixes#13441.
In 452e226ea2 and
648a60baf6, we changed how `search:`
narrows work to:
(1) Never mark messages as read inside searches (search:)
(2) Take you to the bottom, not the first unread, if a `near:` or
similar wasn't specified.
This is far better behavior for these use cases, because in these
narrows, you can't actually see all the context around the target
messages, so marking them as read is counterproductive. This is
especially important in `has:mention` where you goal is likely
specifically to keep track of which threads mentioning you haven't
been read. But in many other narrows, the current behavior is
effectively (1) setting the read bit on random messages and (2) if the
search term matches many messages in a muted stream with 1000s of
unreads, making it hard or impossible to find recent search matches.
The new behavior is that any narrow that is structurally a search of
history (including everything that that isn't a stream, topic,
pm-with, "all messages" or "private messages") gets that new behavior
of being unable to mark messages as read and narrows taking you to the
latest matching messages.
A few corner cases of interest:
* `is:private` is keeping the old behavior, because users on
chat.zulip.org found it confusing for `is:private` to not mark
messages as read when one could see them all. Possibly a more
complex answer is required here.
* `near:` narrows are getting the new behavior, even if it's a stream:
+ topic: narrow. This is debatable, but is probably better than
what was happening before.
Modified significantly by tabbott for cleanliness of implementation,
this commit message, and unit tests.
Fixes#9893. Follow-up to #12556.
The compose_state.recipient field was only actually the recipient for
the message if it was a private_message_recipient (in the sense of
other code); we store the stream in compose_state.stream instead.
As a result, the name was quite confusing, resulting in the
possibility of problematic correctness bugs where code assumes this
field has a valid value for stream messages. Fix this by changing it
to compose_state.private_message_recipient for clarity.
Priyank Patel
Anders Kaseorg
YashRE42
Aman Agrawal
Ryan Rehman
Tim Abbott
Aman Agrawal
Hashir Sarwar
Tim Abbott
Stefan Weil
Steve Howell
Anders Kaseorg
shubhamgupta2956
Mohit Gupta