Note we're no longer using subscriptions_html in the help docs, so no need
to test for it. There is already a test for subscriptions_html in
IntegrationTest.
Got a support request for someone following these instructions who missed
that step, so putting it on its own line. It's relatively easy to miss since
it's the only instruction that's not in bold.
We have a body-level click handler that closes
all modals if you click outside a modal. This
code is a bit brittle, because we need to first
check that the element we clicked is not in a modal,
and our markup there isn't entirely consistent.
This is a quick fix that just adds `#user-profile-modal`
as one of the selectors to look for.
Fixes#10500
In the event that two processes are racing to be the
first to load data from zulip.yaml, we now make the
race scenario be duplicated effort instead of having
the second racer get an attribute error on `data`.
We do this by declaring victory only after setting
`data`. "Declaring victory" in this case is a matter
of setting `last_update`.
We are still possibly vulnerable to corrupted data
here, so we should investigate a mutex, or just
read the data on every call (but it's strangely
expensive, almost 3.5s on my instance), or converting
the YAML to code before launching the server.
Before this change, the way we loaded
webpack for various tools was brittle.
First, I addressed test-api and test-help-documentation.
These tools used to be unable to run standalone on a
clean provision, because they were (indirectly)
calling tools/webpack without the `--test` option.
The problem was a bit obscure, since running things
like `./tools/test-backend` or `./tools/test-all` in
your workflow would create `./var/webpack-stats-test.json`
for the broken tools (and then they would work).
The tools themselves weren't broken; they were the
only relying on the common `test_server_running` helper.
And even that helper wasn't broken; it was just that
`run-dev.py` wasn't respecting the `--test` option.
So I made it so that `./tools/run-dev` passes in `--test` to
`./tools/webpack`.
To confuse matters even more, for some reason Casper
uses `./webpack-stats-production.json` via various
hacks for its webpack configuration, so when I fixed
the other tests, it broke Casper.
Here is the Casper-related hack in zproject/test_settings.py,
which was in place before my change and remains
after it:
if CASPER_TESTS:
WEBPACK_FILE = 'webpack-stats-production.json'
else:
WEBPACK_FILE = os.path.join('var', 'webpack-stats-test.json')
I added similar logic in tools/webpack:
if "CASPER_TESTS" in os.environ:
build_for_prod_or_casper(args.quiet)
I also made the helper functions in `./tools/webpack` have
nicer names.
So, now tools should all be able to run standalone and not
rely on previous tools creating webpack stats files for
them and leaving them in the file system. That's good.
Things are still a bit janky, though. It's not completely
clear to me why `test-js-with-casper` should work off of
a different webpack configuration than the other tests.
For now most of the jankiness is around Casper, and we have
hacks in two different places, `zproject/test_settings.py` and
`tools/webpack` to force it to use the production stats
file instead of the "test" one, even though Casper uses
test-like settings for other things like which database
you're using.
We don't use input.create_non_editable_pill() in our
code yet. If we add this back, we'll want to have node
tests on it.
Removing this unused code brings us to 100% line
coverage for input_pill.js.
This directly reverts 5c11ab85 with the small addition
of adding input_pill to our list of fully covered
modules.
This fixes an inconsistent test failure with test_users.py (that
depended on the ordering between this migration and the creation of
test database users like hamlet).
Rishi Gupta
Steve Howell
Vishnu Ks
Akash Nimare
Eeshan Garg
Rhea Parekh
Tim Abbott
Yago González
Rohitt Vashishtha