These characters are not allowed and trying to create a Zulip message
with those characters throws a JsonableError in check_stream_topic.
We don't want to reject emails with those chars in the subject, so
it's best to just modify it appropriately.
This commit checks for null values for keys within "attachment" in
the Slack integration's incoming payloads. These keys were expected
to exist optionally previously, and the existence of null values for
these wasn't anticipated. Due to an issue report for such null
values in the payload, their handling is updated appropriately.
The checks for these values are truthiness checks since the strategy
for these values being null or falsy ("", 0) is the same; we don't
process that key-value pair. This is consistent with how Slack handles
this scenario.
For the case where all the attachment fields have null values, Slack
displays this as an empty block with no content, and therefore our
strategy for this is a no-op.
Tests updated.
Since this decorator is only used for methods of
TestServiceBotEventTriggers, we can type the decorated method's
signature accurately without using ParamSpec.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
We can express the type of these decorators with Concatenate and ParamSpec
now for tighter type annotations.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This removes ViewFuncT and all the associated type casts with ParamSpec
and Concatenate. This provides more accurate type annotation for
decorators at the cost of making the concatenated parameters
positional-only. This change does not intend to introduce any other
behavioral difference. Note that we retype args in process_view as
List[object] because the view functions can not only be called with
arguments of type str.
Note that the first argument of rest_dispatch needs to be made
positional-only because of the presence of **kwargs.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This module was originally introduced in 2016 to assist adding mypy
annotations to the project. Back then static type checking was not that
established throughout the codebase, so it was helpful to be able to
print out the types for type checking purposes.
This workflow is no longer helpful for improving type annotations right
now, and it has been unused for a while.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Followup to commit fde9b1d366 (#22753).
(This was a misuse of “idempotent”. “Idempotent” means that
performing the request more than once in a row has the same effect as
performing it once; it says nothing about whether the response is
cacheable.)
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
It’s been unused since commit 2eacc7317d
removed the only caller of abort_all and commit
ef815e9e79 removed abort_all itself.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This was added by commit 7f174213ed, and
appears to have been designed for responses that are *successful* but
falsy. Logically, these should not implicitly represent a failure to
be retried if it were.
Note from tabbott: The background is that this idempotent retry loop
was a hacky workaround for a bug we never understood but saw daily in
production. Especially during server restarts / client reloads,
something would result in 200 responses with no data being seen by the
frontend, despite the Django server not having received/processed the
request. Fortunately, this strange failure mode appears to have
stopped happening in late 2019, so we can delete this hack.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Commit 9aa5082d63 (#20673) incorrectly
changed the name of the error callback passed to channel.get. This
prevented reporting of errors while moving a topic. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Whether we sent a resolve topic notification or not may be useful in
the caller. It was originally intended to be used in #21712, but may
only be relevant for future logging.
Part of #21712.
This will have no real effect in most situations. However, a user
moves a topic to another stream while also adding/removing the
resolved-topic checkmark from the topic name, then the "This topic was
resolved" notificaiton will now appear just before the "This topic was
moved" notification rather than just after.
This is likely slightly less confusing to users, since the topic
having been moved from somewhere else is likely the most salient fact
to a reader.
We expect to change things to not send both notifications in an
upcoming commit.
This refactoring helps with #21712.
When we detect that multiple messages are selected, copying will copy the
entirety of each message that is selected. [more conversation on that
here](https://chat.zulip.org/#narrow/stream/6-frontend/topic/triple.20click.20.2B.20copy.20paste.20bug/near/1398292).
This commit fixes a bug where we would select the entirety of a message
following a selection even when none of that last message's text was
selected (only some HTML element in the messages's container).
Fixes#18706.
A message selection that goes off the end of the last message in a topic
could still be a selection of only one message. We shouldn't assume that
it's multiple messages, and so there shouldn't be an assignment of
`skip_same_td_check = true`.
The table_name property was only ever undefined for the
special all_messages_list object.
In 6f764ce4b3, we downgraded that object
to only have a MessageListData; as a result, we now never construct a
MessageList or MessageListView without `table_name` set correctly.
`current` should ideally be `undefined` here to reflect the
correct narrow state but to make sure background updates of
message_list go smoothly, we set it to home.
Our seat count calculation is different for guest user than normal users
(a number of initial guests are free, and additional marginal guests are
worth 1/5 of a seat) - so these checks we apply when a user is being
invited or signing up need to know whether it's a guest or non-guest
being added.
This is a simple generalization of get_latest_seat_count and is useful
for calculating "what will be the realm's license count if this
number of (guest) users is added?" without duplicating any of the math
logic. Will be used in the next commits.
Our billing FAQ says:
"For an organization with N other users, 5*N guest users are included at
no extra charge. After that, you will be charged at 1/5 of your regular
per-user pricing for each additional guest.".
It wasn't quite intuitive to me that
max(non_guests, math.ceil(guests / 5)) achieves that pricing, so it's
worth mentioning in a comment that it does and that that's why that
formula is used.
This commit reuses set_delete_own_message_policy_dropdown to enable
or disable the time limit settings based on change in
delete_own_message_policy dropdown.
This is a prep commit for deduplicating code and using this same
function set_delete_own_message_policy_dropdown for disabling or
enabling the limit setting while changing policy dropdown.
Tim Abbott
Mateusz Mandera
Hari Prashant Bhimaraju
Aman Agrawal
Zixuan James Li
Israel Ebonko
Ganesh Pawar
Sahil Batra
Anders Kaseorg
Julia Bichler
evykassirer