There’s no reason to do this unless you’re, like, trying to trip the
Let’s Encrypt rate limits (or perhaps trying to manually test this code).
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
When copying a message by clicking on "copy and close" button in
message edit box an alert appears that says "Copied!"; Background
of the message is set corresponding with the day mode but not the
night mode. This changes the background of the alert message to
the dark color in night mode.
Also adds tests to ensure that we do not accidentally overwrite
the 'beginning' variable that contains the message content upto
that point. These should prevent similar errors in the future.
The bug was added in 8119258c4d.
This change was prompted by a possible bug on Clubhouse's end. In
general, if a branch is added, it also prompts a workflow state
transition in its primary story.
However, our webhook error logs show an erroneous payload where
the same branch is added to another story, but there is no
workflow state transition. Also, both the stories are grouped in
the same payload, which confused/broke our code. Ideally, this
shouldn't happen and is most likely a bug on Clubhouse's end.
In most cases, changes included in Clubhouse payloads never
pertain to more than one parent entity (stories) simultaneously,
and we usually operate under the assumption that the changes
included therein are related to each other in terms of their
parent object (story or epic) and not a child object (the GitHub
branch).
A check suite is a collection of check runs. We care a lot more
about the outcomes of check runs in this case because check_run
payloads are a lot more informative than check_suite payloads.
(And in any case, the check_suite events are primarily for notifying
tools like CI to run checks).
We only support notifications for events where a check run has
completed. Notifications for when a check run has been queued or
is in progress are not very informative and may be too noisy.
The bug here was that when we rerendered messages following local echo
through the echo.process_from_server code path, the eventual call to
_rerender_header() made the implicit assumption that all messages in a
message group had the same date. As a result, it created a totally
new/fake message group and called the rendering logic on that group
without calling the functions for setting up recipient row dates,
which would always result in no recipient bar date being added. This
bug was latent/invisible before, because when introduced, the locally
echoed messages were always being added to a recipient group from
today, where the recipient bar's date area was by default empty anyway.
This latent bug was revealed when we modified the structure of the app
to do date dividers between individual messages within a message
group, rather than strictly between message groups.
When we're handling a single message that was locally echoed, there
will very likely be 0 messages not removed by
`echo.process_from_server`, and we can skip the unnecessary call to
`message_events.insert_new_messages`. This is a small performance
optimization and logical simplification when sending messages.
We do not anticipate our UI for showing stream descriptions looking
reasonable for multi-line descriptions, so we should just ban creating
them.
Given the frontend changes, multi-line descriptions are only likely to
show up from importing content from other tools, in which case
replacing newlines with spaces is cleaner than the alternative.
This commit achieves two things:
1. Changes the UI of the "Create stream" form to make the
textarea previously used to get the stream description
a simple input field of type text (to suggest a single
line description).
2. Adds an extra check on the frontend side to make sure that
when users create a new stream via. the "Create stream"
option in the settings panel, they can't enter any newline
characters (i.e. we disallow the enter key from being
registered when typing out the stream description).
We must also make sure that they cannot copy-and-paste over
descriptions containing newline characters.
resolves#11617
For consistency, we should keep all the code that works with
@mentions in markdown.js. In this case, message_list_view was
rewriting the contents of the mentions in cases where users'
names had been changed since we rendered their mention.
This change should help people discover to distinguish
silent mentions in text as a part of Zulip syntax while
differentiating them from regular mentions.
To test formatting we want a hard coded date, so we
can verify the date arithmetic with stable dates.
To make the test less brittle, we disable the
feature to remove old drafts.
This was an emergency fix. We should probably just
remove the last N drafts instead of having the 30-day
limit. Or we should have a better way to stub the cutoff
date.
synicalsyntax
Anders Kaseorg
Eeshan Garg
Rishi Gupta
Challa Venkata Raghava Reddy
Rohitt Vashishtha
Vaibhav
Puneeth Chaganti
Priyanshu Singh
Tim Abbott
Wyatt Hoodes
Hemanth V. Alluri
Steve Howell