Adds the `account-creation` class to `<div>` tag in template so that
the associated CSS styles for `white-box p:last-of-type` and the
font-weight are applied.
Previously, the email had a line that says "Click the button below". This
sounds weird as the plain text emails don't have buttons and only had links.
We should change "Click the button below" to "Click the link below" which
makes more sense.
After merging #24423, it was found that there were still an email yet to be updated with the new lines introduced in that PR. This commit updates both the email and plain-text versions.
This is a continuation of #24260 where we have redrafted the "contact us"
line in various emails, but the plain-text versions of those emails remains
untouched. We want to also update those versions and ensure that they match
with our emails.
Fixes: #25198.
Several onboarding emails sent to new users/organizations used the
same "contact us" language. Adds new macros for the "contact us"
line for Zulip Cloud and self-hosted realms to eliminate repetition.
The suitable macro for Zulip Cloud vs self-hosted organizations is
decided conditionally, by checking corporate_enabled.
Fixes#24260.
This commit renames ID of the container element of group
settings overlay to group_overlay_container. We also
rename the variables used for this element. This makes
it consistent with the container element of settings overlay.
This commit renames ID of the container element of stream
settings overlay to streams_overlay_container. This makes
it consistent with the container element of settings overlay.
Because unsubscribing from welcome emails cannot be undone, it is
confusing that the unsubscribe success page suggests that the user
can. Makes the second sentence about undoing the unsubscribe action
conditional on the `subscription_type` not being "welcome".
Updates the first sentence to specifically note the Zulip realm
that has been updated for the unsubscribe action so that it is
clear for which Zulip organization the user's settings have been
updated/changed, since the user might have accounts with various
Zulip organizations (via Zulip Cloud or self-hosted servers) that
use the same email account.
exempt_from_license_number_check was initially added allowing
organizations with it enabled to invite new users above their number of
licenses.
However, an organization with this permission enabled,
cannot upgrade if they weren't on a plan already - because when choosing
Manual license management, you cannot enter a number of licenses lower
than the current seat count. However, an organization like that probably
already has some users that they get free of charge - and thus they need
to be able to enter a lower number of licenses in order to upgrade.
If the script comes from a different origin than the requesting page,
and is not marked `crossorigin="anonymous"`, the `window.onerror`
handler receives no information other than "Script error." in the
event of a runtime error.
This effectively silences blueslip errors in development if the user
is developing on a remote host (such as a DigitalOcean droplet), since
static resources are served from `hostname.zulipdev.org`, and the
realm is served from `realmname.hostname.zulipdev.org`. It also
silenced blueslip reporting in production for any non-default (non-"")
realms. Sentry reporting, Vagrant developments, and truly ancient or
insecure browsers were unaffected.
Add the necessary `crossorigin="anonymous"` attribute to the
`<script>` tag to allow blueslip access to this error information.
This issue was introduced after we changed the library we use for
inlining CSS into email HTML. For some reason, the styles in
email.css were not applied earlier but were applied after we
migrated to css-inline. With this commit, we have fixed the
regression in background-color of email body.
Fixes#25083.
This issue was introduced after we changed the library we use for
inlining CSS into email HTML. For some reason, the styles in
email.css were not applied earlier but were applied after we
migrated to css-inline. With this commit, we have fixed the
regression in footer styles.
Fixes part of #25083
Per the issue #25045, this commit changes some occurences of `uri`
appeared in variable `root_domain_uri`. Files affected are some
html files that used this variables and a backend file
`context_processors.py` that set it as a key.
Adds a new welcome email, `onboarding_zulip_guide`, to be sent four
days after a new user registers with a Zulip organization if the
organization has specified a particular organization type that has
a guide in the corporate `/for/.../` pages. If there is no guide,
then no email is scheduled or sent.
The current `for/communities/` page is not very useful for users
who are not organization administrators, so these onboarding guide
emails are further restricted for those organization types to
only go to new users who are invited/registered as admins for the
organzation.
Adds two database queries for new user registrations: one to get
the organization's type and one to create the scheduled email.
Adds two email logs because the email is sent both to a new user
who registers with an existing organization and to the organization
owner when they register a new organization.
Co-authored by: Alya Abbott <alya@zulip.com>
Previously, we had an architecture where CSS inlining for emails was
done at provision time in inline_email_css.py. This was necessary
because the library we were using for this, Premailer, was extremely
slow, and doing the inlining for every outgoing email would have been
prohibitively expensive.
Now that we've migrated to a more modern library that inlines the
small amount of CSS we have into emails nearly instantly, we are able
to remove the complex architecture built to work around Premailer
being slow and just do the CSS inlining as the final step in sending
each individual email.
This has several significant benefits:
* Removes a fiddly provisioning step that made the edit/refresh cycle
for modifying email templates confusing; there's no longer a CSS
inlining step that, if you forget to do it, results in your testing a
stale variant of the email templates.
* Fixes internationalization problems related to translators working
with pre-CSS-inlined emails, and then Django trying to apply the
translators to the post-CSS-inlined version.
* Makes the send_custom_email pipeline simpler and easier to improve.
Signed-off-by: Daniil Fadeev <fadeevd@zulip.com>
- Being more specific about what the user will get.
- Putting less emphasis on entering multiple emails, since most
people probably just have one email they need to check.
- Using more intuitive wording and hint that deactivated or
deleted accounts won't be included.
Fixes: #24890.
In previous commits, we updated the realm creation flow to show
the realm name, type and subdomain fields in the first form
when asking for the email of the user. This commit updates the
user registration form to show the already filled realm details
as non-editable text and there is also a button to edit the
realm details before registration.
We also update the sub-heading for user registration form as
mentioned in the issue.
Fixes part of #24307.
We now show inputs for realm details like name, type and URL
in the create_realm.html template opened for "/new" url and
these information will be stored in PreregistrationRealm
objects in further commits.
We add a new class RealmDetailsForm in forms.py for this
such that it is used as a base class for RealmCreationForm
and we define RealmDetailsForm such that we can use it as
a subclass for RegistrationForm as well to avoid duplication.
This commit extracts realm creation form html in a new file
realm_creation_form.html as we are reworking the organization
flow as per #24307 and this change would allow us to avoid
duplicating the code.
This commit updates the ID for form element in create_realm.html
to "create_realm" as we would need to update the error handling
for this page in further commits and we do not want to break it
for other forms using "send_confirm" as ID.
This just replaces the billing/upgrade with the statement that
"Your organization has requested sponsored or discounted hosting.", so
it should include an obvious contact in case the customer wants to amend
something or just bump a request that may have gotten missed.
Previously this was only available on the upgrade page - meaning an
organization that already bought a plan wouldn't be able to request a
sponsorship to get a discount or such, even if qualified.