Pull request comment alerts were previously sent to a topic for an issue,
which resulted in two different topics for the same PR.
Fixes: #26086.
Co-authored-by: Lauryn Menard <lauryn@zulip.com>
Updated the repo name and pull request number/title for the new
pull request commit fixture to be the same as the one used for the
other pull request test fixtures (e.g. pull_request__opened) so
that the TOPIC_PR can be used in the subsequent updates.
Co-authored-by: Lauryn Menard <lauryn@zulip.com>
Earlier the `/poll` slash command was the only way to create polls.
To increase user friendliness with a GUI, a button to launch a modal
to create a poll, has been added to the compose box. This button is
enabled only when the compose box is empty, to avoid complexities with
losing / having to save as draft any message already being composed.
The modal has a form which on submission frames a message using the
`/poll` syntax and the data input in the form, and sets the content of
the compose box to that message, which the user can then send. The
question field is mandatory for form submission.
Fixes: #20304.
This is a prep commit for the next commit, which will add a modal for
creating polls. The container div allows a tooltip to be added to the
button in a disabled state (which is needed for the poll modal).
When toggling off link formatting, it is assumed that the description
does not contain [ and ] characters, and the url does not contain ( and
) characters.
Co-authored-by: N-Shar-ma <bablinaneh@gmail.com>
Note that toggling off spoiler formatting works if either all the
content inside, or the header (if it exists) or both are selected.
Co-authored-by: N-Shar-ma <bablinaneh@gmail.com>
Note that toggling off, only works for code blocks without a specified
language. So toggling formatting off only works for code blocks like:
```
code
```
and not:
```javascript
code
```
Co-authored-by: N-Shar-ma <bablinaneh@gmail.com>
This is a preparatory commit for new formatting buttons which are added
in the following commits.
Earlier we used multiple classes, each of which handled the hiding or
showing of the element it was applied to, at each breakpoint. Now all
the media queries of those classes have been combined into a new class,
for cleaner and more reusable code. This new combined media query is
also updated to accommodate the new formatting buttons.
We don't show emoji icon on message on width range even if the
logged in user is not the sender, which causes popover to not
be displayed since the reference is not visible.
To avoid such case in future, we just check if the emoji icon is
visible and if not fallback to the ellipsis icon for reference.
In the previous menu for moving messages, the default option was
"Move this and all following messages." However, this default choice
was not always aligned with user intentions, particularly when moving
the first or last message in a topic. In such cases, the desired
behavior often corresponds to "Move all messages in this topic" for the
first message and "Move only this message" for the last message.
To address this, we have updated the default options as follows:
1. **When moving the first message in a topic:** The default option is
now "Move all messages in this topic." This change better represents
the user's intention when moving the initial message in a topic.
2. **When moving the last message in a topic:** The default option has
been adjusted to "Move only this message." This change ensures that
users can easily move the last message without affecting other messages
in the topic.
These changes are designed to enhance the user experience and
facilitate the management of topics, especially when users follow or
unmute topics.
Fixes: #27298.
The user avatar flowed out of the popover and this commit
fixes it by increasing the popover width by 2px and making
it 242px (240px for avatar and 2px for borders). This
also changes the width of user group popovers, but it is
only a slight change so should be fine.
This may happen if there are multiple servers with the same UUID
submitting data (e.g. if they were cloned after initial creation), or
if there is one server, but `./manage.py clear_analytics_tables` was
used to truncate the analytics tables.
In the case of `clear_analytics_tables`, the data submitted likely has
identical historical values with new remote `id` values; preserving
the originally-submitted contemporaneous data is the best option. For
the case of submissions from multiple servers, there is no completely
sensible outcome, so the best we can do is detect the case and move
on.
Since we have a lock on the RemoteZulipServer, we know that no other
inserts are happening, so counting before and after will return the
true number of rows inserted (which `bulk_create` cannot do in the
face of `ignore_conflicts`[^1]). We compare this to the expected
number of new inserted rows to detect dropped duplicates.
[^1]: See https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/30138.
This does not ensure that we do not mix data from multiple servers
sharing a UUID -- if one has more `RemoteRealmCount` rows,
and the other has more `RemoteInstalltionCount` rows, the end result
will still be some rows from each server, across the two tables.
It does ensure that we will not alternate rows between two servers
if both requests are processed at the same time.
It also causes submissions to be all-or-nothing in the event of
integrity errors. This is not necessarily beneficial, as forward
progress is generally useful -- but the integrity errors are resolved
in the subsequent commit.
This applies f299f31340 but for the push bouncer receiving side.
This is particularly important as we start relying on the unique
constraints, via `ON CONFLICT ... IGNORE`, in subsequent commits.
Fixes: #12362.
If the update / add card session is successful, return user to
manual license management page if user was on it before clicking
the add / update card button.
Until now, when a user quoted and replied to a message, even while
editing another, the quote would be inserted into the compose box. There
was no way to quote into the edit box.
Detecting the edit box to add content too was tricky, since on opening
the message actions popover, that message would be selected, while the
edit box would lose focus.
Now we don't shift focus on opening the message actions popover, keep
track of the last focused textarea and add the quote content to it if
if it's still in the DOM (if the user has not cancelled the editing).
Fixes: #20380.
This is a prep commit for the next commit, which will quote a message
into the last focused compose type textarea, which we track in a new
`compose_state` variable in this commit.
Now since all actions available in the message actions popover operate
on that message itself, we don't need to select the message row when
opening the popover.
This is a prep commit for allowing quoting and replying while editing a
message sent earlier.
Up until now, the currently selected message was the one that was always
quoted. Now if there's a message_id passed in, we'll quote that message
instead, otherwise we'll fall back on the selected message.
This is a prep commit for allowing quoting and replying while editing a
message sent earlier.
Up until now, the currently selected message was the one that was always
responded to. Now if there's a message_id passed in, we'll use that
message instead, otherwise we'll fall back to the selected message.
This is a prep commit for allowing quoting and replying while editing
a message sent earlier.
This reduces the giant load spike at 5 minute past the hour, when all
remote servers currently attempt to submit their records.
We do not wish to slew over a full hour, because we want to ensure
that we do not hold the lock when the next hour's analytics runs. It
is also not necessary to have that much variation; 10 minutes is
picked as an arbitrary "long enough" time to spread requests over.
Earlier, a 'large @-mention notification' warning that pops up
for stream wildcard mentions was shown for topic wildcard mentions
too, which is incorrect.
This commit fixes the incorrect behavior. We no longer show the
banner for @-topic mentions.
We don't need a banner for @-topic mentions, as those are much less
likely to be used without thinking about it and would rarely be spammy
for a lot of people.
Fixes#27767.
Satyam Bansal
N-Shar-ma
Julia Bichler
Aman Agrawal
Sayam Samal
Alex Vandiver
M1gue11
Tim Abbott
Sahil Batra
Prakhar Pratyush
Karl Stolley