This commit adds the following:
* A table specifying the arguments that are required for this API
call.
* Examples of JSON responses.
This will help us in obsoleting api_endpoints.html.
This commit splits usage.md into two separate docs,
stream-message.md and private-message.md. The arguments and return
values for sending a stream message are somewhat different from
those of sending a private message, so it made sense to split the
two up for clarity.
There might be case that NOTIFICATION_BOT is none, so before sending stream
announce notification, check first if settings.NOTIFICATION_BOT is not none.
I am increasing the threshold even more for when
codecov complains. Since the tool reports so many
false negatives, we should probably change our philosophy
on code coverage so that this tool only reports
catastrophic commits (like .e.g. a commit that prevents
running a whole test suite) and let our more specific
tools continue to catch things like regressions of files
from 100% coverage.
This uses the correct regex for strikethrough. Also, added
a test to make sure that strikethrough works when it contains
link with whitespace.
Fixes#7596.
We join extra text message for notification and xhr response text by ':'.
Before joining, check if xhr response text already include ':', to
prevent notification with more than one ':'.
A `None` value is not properly handled in this function, which
indicates some lack of testing or a recent regression we don't
understand. We were getting lots of tracebacks from this line
of code on our test server:
mentioned = 'mentioned' in flags and 'read' not in flags
This change has a few cleanups:
* We early-return on last_msg_container === undefined
to make the function flatter.
* We avoid comparing two boolean values for equality,
which can be a landmine if one of the values is
`undefined`, which is falsy but not actually `false`.
* We extract some local variables for readability.
* We make the conditions for subscribe/unsubscribe
more explicit.
This fixes a bug where this used to happen:
* Alice has not read a message
* Bob edits the message
* Alice immediately reads the message
* Bob's edit arrives to Alice and sets her
message status back to unread
Essentially, the root cause of the bug is that we update
message.unread for edits, possibly from stale data, even
though Alice has more current info about reading the message.
This is the final fix to that scenario. There were some
aggravating factors that widened the race window which were
fixed in earlier commits.
Fixes#6248
We were queuing up individual messages to be flagged as
read on the server before this change, and we used debounce
to avoid sending individual POSTs, but this created delays
that were ripe for race conditions.
Now we batch them in the caller and use throttle instead.
This now prevents us from slamming the server with lots of
individual requests, without as many opportunities for races.
(Note that we still have some possibility of race conditions,
but they should be rare now, and other commits will address
some of the other contributors to read/unread glitches.)
Once we convert message.flags to more specific boolean attributes
like message.mentioned and message.alerted, we should get rid of
the `flags` attribute, as it will only confuse debugging.
We no longer set message.flags in the local echo path.
In the markdown parsing step, we just set message.mentioned
directly.
And then we change `insert_new_messages` to no longer
convert flags to booleans, and move that code to only
happen for incoming server message events.
We want to call `set_message_booleans` as soon as we
get data from the server, to avoid confusion about whether
`flags` is the authoritative field.
This commit has callers to `add_message_metadata` call
`set_message_booleans`.
This also sets us up to **not** call `set_message_booleans`
in the local echo codepath, where we can just have the
markdown processor set booleans natively.
In all cases the value of `flags` we were passing in was
actually `message.flags` (although it was slightly obscured in
one place), so now we just pass in `message`.
(We also move a tiny bit of defensive code to set `flags`
into `set_message_booleans`.)
Eeshan Garg
YJDave
akashnimare
MadElf1337
Steve Howell
cPhost
Rishi Gupta
Kiy4h
Balaji2198
Cynthia Lin
Rhea Parekh