"help" command occurs in the command list in
initial pms or when bot doesn't understand the message. It doesn't
occur when the bot is respoding to the "help" command itself.
1. The initial welcome message now contains less detail.
2. The bot now responds to these commands: "apps", "edit profile",
"dark mode", "light mode", "streams", "topics", "message formatting",
"keyboard shortcuts" and "help" - the bot still responds if there are
slight variations in these commands.
3. Tests have been made to check if bot responds to the advertised
commands (with variations) and gives a negative message if it doesn't
understand the message.
With substantial tweaks by tabbott.
Fixes#19900.
test_signup: This test was wrong, because the inviter UserProfile was
from a different realm. Such a PreregistrationUser shouldn't be
considered valid.
test_tutorial: The direct call to internal_send_private_message was
using sender's realm as the realm argument which is not valid. It
doesn't lead to any error because the codepath seems to mostly not care
about the realm arg if the sender is a cross-realm bot. From my reading
of the code I think that wrong realm arg here would break user mentions,
because it makes its way to check_message() and then to
build_message_send_dict - but overall the message gets sent without
errors. Either way, this was a bug in the test and should be fixed.
Fixes#2665.
Regenerated by tabbott with `lint --fix` after a rebase and change in
parameters.
Note from tabbott: In a few cases, this converts technical debt in the
form of unsorted imports into different technical debt in the form of
our largest files having very long, ugly import sequences at the
start. I expect this change will increase pressure for us to split
those files, which isn't a bad thing.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Generated by `pyupgrade --py3-plus --keep-percent-format` on all our
Python code except `zthumbor` and `zulip-ec2-configure-interfaces`,
followed by manual indentation fixes.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
We now have this API...
If you really just need to log in
and not do anything with the actual
user:
self.login('hamlet')
If you're gonna use the user in the
rest of the test:
hamlet = self.example_user('hamlet')
self.login_user(hamlet)
If you are specifically testing
email/password logins (used only in 4 places):
self.login_by_email(email, password)
And for failures uses this (used twice):
self.assert_login_failure(email)
This commit mostly makes our tests less
noisy, since emails are no longer an important
detail of sending messages (they're not even
really used in the API).
It also sets us up to have more scrutiny
on delivery_email/email in the future
for things that actually matter. (This is
a prep commit for something along those
lines, kind of hard to explain the full
plan.)
MigrationsTestCase is intentionally omitted from this, since migrations
tests are different in their nature and so whatever setUp()
ZulipTestCase may do in the future, MigrationsTestCase may not
necessarily want to replicate.
This endpoint is part of the old tutorial, which we've removed, and
has some security downsides as well.
This includes a minor refactoring of the tests.
This fixes most cases where we were assigning a user to
the var email and then calling get_user_profile_by_email with
that var.
(This was fixed mostly with a script.)
Anders Kaseorg
Palash
Mateusz Mandera
Gaurav Pandey
Anders Kaseorg
Steve Howell
Mateusz Mandera
Anders Kaseorg
rht
Robert Hönig
Alena Volkova
Yago González
Rick Chern
Steve Howell
sinwar
Sahil Dua