This was added by commit 7f174213ed, and
appears to have been designed for responses that are *successful* but
falsy. Logically, these should not implicitly represent a failure to
be retried if it were.
Note from tabbott: The background is that this idempotent retry loop
was a hacky workaround for a bug we never understood but saw daily in
production. Especially during server restarts / client reloads,
something would result in 200 responses with no data being seen by the
frontend, despite the Django server not having received/processed the
request. Fortunately, this strange failure mode appears to have
stopped happening in late 2019, so we can delete this hack.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
A user wouldn't differentiate between a "normal" modal and a "settings"
modal. If one shows up instantly, one would expect all the others to do
the same. The difference between Bootstrap fade and non-fade is pretty
noticeable (300 ms for fading).
This is a prep commit for the Micromodal migration which will have 120ms
as the animation time which wouldn't feel slow.
We attach the DOM for the modal to the body element
to avoid style interference from other elements and having to choose
a separate parent element for every single dialog_widget.
We used html_submit_button to pass text to be present in the modal
submit button. There are only two possible options as of now -
"Confirm" and "Save changes" and the correct one can be determined
using is_confirm_modal parameter. So, we remove this paramter for
now and we can add it later if we have more type of modals using
this widget.
This commit renames the variables, functions used in confirm_dialog.js
and classes and ids used in confirm_dialog.hbs.
This change is made so that we can easily migrate edit_fields_modal to
use this same code with some more changes.
We will change the file names and correspondingly import variables in
the next commit.
This commit renames confirm_dialog_yes_button class to
confirm_dialog_submit_button. This will help in keeping
a general class name when deduplicating the code for
confirm_dialog and edit_fields_modal.
This commit renames the html_yes_button parameter of confirm
dialog widget to html_submit_button and also all the related
variables in confirm_dialog.js.
This will help in keeping a general name when deduplicating
the code for confirm_dialog and edit_fields_modal.
Moved `revoke_invite` user-confirmation modal to the
`confirm_dialog` folder and renamed the modal to
`confirm_revoke_invite.hbs` to follow the common naming convention.
Moved `resend_invite` user-confirmation modal to the
`confirm_dialog` folder and renamed the modal to
to `confirm_resend_invite.hbs` to follow the common naming convention.
Modified resend_invite modal heading to remove the email
field to avoid it's duplication, since the email feild is
also displayed within the actual modal body.
Moved `admin_invites_list` template to `/templates/settings/` folder as
earlier, it was inaccurately placed within the `/templates` folder
and should have been within the `/templates/settings` folder instead.
The only reason to use typeof foo === "undefined" is when foo is a
global identifier that might not have been declared at all, so it
might raise a ReferenceError if evaluated. For a variable declared
with const or let or import, a function argument, or a complex
expression, simply foo === undefined is equivalent.
Some of these conditions have become impossible and can be removed
entirely, and some can be replaced more idiomatically with default
parameters (note that JavaScript does not share the Python misfeature
of evaluating the default parameter at function declaration time).
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
We now display the name of referrer instead of email in invites list
and clicking on the name opens the user popover.
This helps us to avoid showing fake emails when the email address
visibility is hidden.
Tweaked by tabbott to still look at both email and name for filtering.
ES and TypeScript modules are strict by default and don’t need this
directive. ESLint will remind us to add it to new CommonJS files and
remove it from ES and TypeScript modules.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Prettier would do this anyway, but it’s separated out for a more
reviewable diff. Generated by ESLint.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
We have changed our all instances of list_render to use
simplebar and thus, we will now use simplebar container
to track scroll event for all the lists created by
list_render.
This fixes the bug of new subscribers not rendering on
scrolling at the end of subscriber list in stream settings
and similar bug in some other lists also.
This commit also removes scroll_util.get_list_scrolling_container
function as this is no longer used.
Fixes#15637.
We send user_id of the referrer instead of email in the invites dict.
Sending user_ids is more robust, as those are an immutable reference
to a user, rather than something that can change with time.
Updates to the webapp UI to display the inviters for more convenient
inspection will come in a future commit.
This commit removes invited_as_values map in settings_invites.js.
This object has been removed to avoid duplication as we already
have role values in settings_config.js.
A similar map is created from settings_config.user_role_values
in settings_config.js and is used to populate invited_as_text
for invites.
This commit changes the PreregistrationUser.invite_as dict to have
same set of values as we have for UserProfile.role.
This also adds a data migration to update the already exisiting
PreregistrationUser and MultiuseInvite objects.
We can now invite new users as realm owners. We restrict only
owners to invite new users as owners both for single invite
and multiuse invite link. Also, only owners can revoke or resend
owner invitations.
Member of the org can able see list of invitations sent by him/her.
given permission for the member to revoke and resend the invitations
sent by him/her and added tests for test member can revoke and resend
the invitations only sent by him/her.
Fixes#14007.
For some widgets we now avoid duplicate redraw
events from this old pattern:
widget = list_render.create(..., {
}).init();
widget.sort(...);
The above code was wasteful and possibly
flicker-y due to the fact that `init` and
`sort` both render.
Now we do this:
widget = list_render.create(..., {
init_sort: [...],
});
For other widgets we just clean up the need
to call `init()` right after `create()`.
We also allow widgets to pass in `sort_fields`
during initialization (since you may want to
have `init_sort` use a custom sort before the
first render.)
Finally, we make the second and third calls
eliminate the prior updates from the previous
widget. This can prevent strange bugs with
double-reversing columns (although that's
been prevented in a better way with a recent
commit), as well as avoiding double work
with sorting.
Anders Kaseorg
Sahil Batra
Ganesh Pawar
Johan Ehinger
sahil839
aryanshridhar
Rohitt Vashishtha
Priyank Patel
Aman Agrawal
jagansivam28
Steve Howell