The migration to css-inline "fixed" the fact that styles from this
file previously were never applied to the internals of missed-message
emails.
Rewrite much of the CSS to more correctly scope to apply to the
appropriate elements, and document with comments the purpose of most
blocks.
Co-authored-by: Tim Abbott <tabbott@zulip.com>
In a previous commit, the frontend of the web app was updated for
URLs with `#narrow/dm/...` for direct messages (group and 1-on-1).
Updates the URLs generated for email notifications and outgoing
webhook notification messages to use the new `/dm/...` format.
Adds a new welcome email, `onboarding_zulip_guide`, to be sent four
days after a new user registers with a Zulip organization if the
organization has specified a particular organization type that has
a guide in the corporate `/for/.../` pages. If there is no guide,
then no email is scheduled or sent.
The current `for/communities/` page is not very useful for users
who are not organization administrators, so these onboarding guide
emails are further restricted for those organization types to
only go to new users who are invited/registered as admins for the
organzation.
Adds two database queries for new user registrations: one to get
the organization's type and one to create the scheduled email.
Adds two email logs because the email is sent both to a new user
who registers with an existing organization and to the organization
owner when they register a new organization.
Co-authored by: Alya Abbott <alya@zulip.com>
Refactors the logic for adjusting the delay for sending an email
to not land on a weekend so that it can be used to schedule any
number of onboarding emails we decide to send.
Consolidates duplicate testing into
`zerver/tests/test_email_notifications.py`. The initial test and
function were introduced in commit 610f2cbacf with the test
located in `zerver/tests/test_signup.py`.
Prep commit for adding new welcome / follow up email.
Previously, we had an architecture where CSS inlining for emails was
done at provision time in inline_email_css.py. This was necessary
because the library we were using for this, Premailer, was extremely
slow, and doing the inlining for every outgoing email would have been
prohibitively expensive.
Now that we've migrated to a more modern library that inlines the
small amount of CSS we have into emails nearly instantly, we are able
to remove the complex architecture built to work around Premailer
being slow and just do the CSS inlining as the final step in sending
each individual email.
This has several significant benefits:
* Removes a fiddly provisioning step that made the edit/refresh cycle
for modifying email templates confusing; there's no longer a CSS
inlining step that, if you forget to do it, results in your testing a
stale variant of the email templates.
* Fixes internationalization problems related to translators working
with pre-CSS-inlined emails, and then Django trying to apply the
translators to the post-CSS-inlined version.
* Makes the send_custom_email pipeline simpler and easier to improve.
Signed-off-by: Daniil Fadeev <fadeevd@zulip.com>
"check_add_user_group" is a safer helper function than
"create_user_group" to use when creating user_groups. It does
error handling and notify the client with the appropriate event.
Note that the populate_db command still uses "create_user_group"
because we do not need to enqueue events at that point.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Since this function creates a new user group into the database,
it is more appropriate to have it not as a generic "lib" function
but as an "action".
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
`render_markdown_path` renders Markdown, and also (since baff121115)
runs Jinja2 on the resulting HTML.
The `pure_markdown` flag was added in 0a99fa2fd6, and did two
things: retried the path directly in the filesystem if it wasn't found
by the Jinja2 resolver, and also skipped the subsequent Jinja2
templating step (regardless of where the content was found). In this
context, the name `pure_markdown` made some sense. The only two
callsites were the TOS and privacy policy renders, which might have
had user-supplied arbitrary paths, and we wished to handle absolute
paths in addition to ones inside `templates/`.
Unfortunately, the follow-up of 01bd55bbcb did not refactor the
logic -- it changed it, by making `pure_markdown` only do the former
of the two behaviors. Passing `pure_markdown=True` after that commit
still caused it to always run Jinja2, but allowed it to look elsewhere
in the filesystem.
This set the stage for calls, such as the one introduced in
dedea23745, which passed both a context for Jinja2, as well as
`pure_markdown=True` implying that Jinja2 was not to be used.
Split the two previous behaviors of the `pure_markdown` flag, and use
pre-existing data to control them, rather than an explicit flag. For
handling policy information which is stored at an absolute path
outside of the template root, we switch to using the template search
path if and only if the path is relative. This also closes the
potential inconsistency based on CWD when `pure_markdown=True` was
passed and the path was relative, not absolute.
Decide whether to run Jinja2 based on if a context is passed in at
all. This restores the behavior in the initial 0a99fa2fd6 where a
call to `rendar_markdown_path` could be made to just render markdown,
and not some other unmentioned and unrelated templating language as
well.
Currently, there is a checkbox setting for whether to
"Include realm name in subject of message notification emails".
This commit replaces the checkbox setting with a dropdown
having values: Automatic [default], Always, Never.
The Automatic option includes the realm name if, and only if,
there are multiple Zulip realms associated with the user's email.
Tests are added and(or) modified.
Fixes: #19905.
In Zulip, message topics are case-insensitive but case-preserving.
The `get_context_for_message` function erroneously did a
case-sensitive search, and thus only messages whose topic matched
exactly were pulled in as context.
Make the missed-message pipeline aware that message topics are not
case-sensitive. This means that, when collapsing adjacent messages,
we merge messages with topic headers which are "different"; create a
separate explicit "grouping" to know which to collapse.
- Clean up the language.
- Add a prominent "Go to organization" button.
- Link to guides for new users and admins.
- Fix duplication bug in text email version.
Co-authored-by: Mateusz Mandera <mateusz.mandera@zulip.com>
Some email clients (notably, Gmail Web) support automatically threading
emails together if recipients and subjects match[1]. Manual testing
indicated that prefixing a subject with "[bracketed content]" does not
break this threading behavior, but the added checkmark in a resolved
topic's title does. Before sending an email notification, determine
whether the topic is resolved, and pass this information to the Jinja
template to properly format a threadable email subject.
Fixes: #22538
[1]: https://support.google.com/mail/answer/5900
Additionally, migrate existing EditMessageTest to use this helper
method, with the side effect of migrating the tested flow from a
/json/messages URL to a /api/v1/messages URL.
This commit updates the urls for personal narrow sent in email
notifications to be of form "{user_id}-{encoded_full_name}" to
make it consistent with the urls that we use for such narrows
in webapp which were recently updated in b4eddad for improving
performance. We encode the full name in the same way that we do in
webapp by replacing the url characters encoded by browser with "-".
Add #stream_name to wildcard mention because it is important
information for interpreting the wildcard mention (larger streams may
mean something very different to you than small ones).
Fixes#22885.
Add {{ realm_name }} to the "Reply to this email directly ..." line.
This ensures the realm name is always present in the email
notification footer area, in a consistent location.
Although our POST /messages handler accepts the ‘to’ parameter with or
without JSON encoding, there are two problems with passing it as an
unencoded string.
Firstly, you’d fail to send a message to a stream named ‘true’ or
‘false’ or ‘null’ or ‘2022’, as the JSON interpretation is prioritized
over the plain string interpretation.
Secondly, and more importantly for our tests, it violates our OpenAPI
schema, which requires the parameter to be JSON-encoded. This is
because OpenAPI has no concept of a parameter that’s “optionally
JSON-encoded”, nor should it: such a parameter cannot be unambiguously
decoded for the reason above.
Our version of openapi-core doesn’t currently detect this schema
violation, but after the next upgrade it will.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This commit changes the name of missed message email tests for
personal and huddle messages to be more clear:
- from *_personal_missed_stream_messages to *_missed_personal_messages
- from *_huddle_missed_stream_messages to *_missed_huddle_messages
We add quote prefix ">" to each line of the message in the plain text
missed message emails, which are then rendered as quotes by email
clients. We also move the message content in the next line after sender.
This helps us in clearly showing the message authors in missed message
emails especially in emails with multiple messages and senders.
Fixes#15836.
Items in `django.core.mail.outbox` are by default typed as the less
general `EmailMessage` type. Before accessing the attribute
`alternatives`, we need to narrow the type to `EmailMultiAlternatives`.
Then narrow the tuple value we want to access to `str` before using
it in `assertIn` or `self.normalize_string`.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Removes `client` parameter from backend tests using the
`POST /messages` endpoint when the test can use the default
`User-Agent` as the client, which is set to `ZulipMobile` for API
requests and a browser user agent string for web app requests.
Various backend tests use the `PATCH /messages/{msg_id}` endpoint.
For that endpoint, the message ID is encoded in the URL path and
ignored if provided as a parameter in the the query.
Verified that the tests were providing the same message ID to both
the path and then removed the ignored parameter in the query.
We now complain if a test author sends a stream message
that does not result in the sender getting a
UserMessage row for the message.
This is basically 100% equivalent to complaining that
the author failed to subscribe the sender to the stream
as part of the test setup, as far as I can tell, so the
AssertionError instructs the author to subscribe the
sender to the stream.
We exempt bots from this check, although it is
plausible we should only exempt the system bots like
the notification bot.
I considered auto-subscribing the sender to the stream,
but that can be a little more expensive than the
current check, and we generally want test setup to be
explicit.
If there is some legitimate way than a subscribed human
sender can't get a UserMessage, then we probably want
an explicit test for that, or we may want to change the
backend to just write a UserMessage row in that
hypothetical situation.
For most tests, including almost all the ones fixed
here, the author just wants their test setup to
realistically reflect normal operation, and often devs
may not realize that Cordelia is not subscribed to
Denmark or not realize that Hamlet is not subscribed to
Scotland.
Some of us don't remember our Shakespeare from high
school, and our stream subscriptions don't even
necessarily reflect which countries the Bard placed his
characters in.
There may also be some legitimate use case where an
author wants to simulate sending a message to an
unsubscribed stream, but for those edge cases, they can
always set allow_unsubscribed_sender to True.
fe25517295 adjusted the email_notifications codepath to use
`lxml.html.fragment_fromstring` method when parsing
`rendered_content`, but left the tests using a helper which called
`fromstring`.
Switching the tests to match the code as run reveals a bug -- using
`drop_tree` on all `message_inline_image` classes now _does_ remove
all of a top-level image-URL-only message. Previously, such messages
were "safe" from the block that calls `drop_tree` only by dint of
`drop_tree` being a silent no-op for the root element. When parsed
using `fragment_fromstring`, they are no longer the root, and as such
an empty message results.
Reorder relative_to_full_url to check for only one `message_inline_image`
within the top `<div>`, and only run the `drop_tree` path in the
alternate case. Tests must be adjusted for their output now including
one more layer of `<div>`.
We do not allow mentioning system user groups for now
because this can lead to circumventing the wildcard
mention restrictions. It will be enabled once we add
a setting to control that.
This is implemented by just ignoring it as one of the
mentioned user group even if the message content
inlcudes the mention syntax for it and the message
is sent normally.
We still keep the for_mention parameter for accessing
user group while sending email and push notifications
as mentioning system user groups will be allowed in
future.
This commit also removes the test for email notifications
for system user groups as we are not allowing mentioning
them.
This commit is only for backend change as we already
exclude the system groups from mention typeaheads and
other UI.
The transforms called from `build_message_payload` use
`lxml.html.fromstring` to parse (and stringify, and re-parse) the HTML
generated by Markdown. However, this function fails if it is passed
an empty document. "empty" is broader than just the empty string; it
also includes any document made entirely out of control characters,
spaces, unpaired surrogates, U+FFFE, or U+FFFF, and so forth. These
documents would fail to parse, and raise a ParserError.
Using `lxml.html.fragment_fromstring` handles these cases, but does by
wrapping the contents in a <div> every time it is called. As such,
replacing each `fromstring` with `fragment_fromstring` would nest
another layer of `<div>`.
Instead of each of the helper functions re-parsing, modifying, and
stringifying the HTML, parse it once with `fragment_fromstring` and
pass around the parsed document to each helper, which modifies it
in-place. This adds one outer `<div>`, requiring minor changes to
tests and the prepend-sender functions.
The modification to add the sender is left using BeautifulSoup, as
that sort of transform is much less readable, and more fiddly, in raw
lxml.
Partial fix for #19559.
We do not allow any user to edit the system user groups (including
renaming, deleting, adding or removing members, etc.) from the
API. These user groups will change only by the code when a new
user is added or role of a user is changed.
This is implemented by rejecting access_user_group_by_id always
except the case when it is use to get the user group for sending
email and push notifications, as we would need to send notifications
to the mentioned user group.
Previously, we checked for the `enable_offline_email_notifications` and
`enable_offline_push_notifications` settings (which determine whether the
user will receive notifications for PMs and mentions) just before sending
notifications. This has a few problem:
1. We do not have access to all the user settings in the notification
handlers (`handle_missedmessage_emails` and `handle_push_notifications`),
and therefore, we cannot correctly determine whether the notification should
be sent. Checks like the following which existed previously, will, for
example, incorrectly not send notifications even when stream email
notifications are enabled-
```
if not receives_offline_email_notifications(user_profile):
return
```
With this commit, we simply do not enqueue notifications if the "offline"
settings are disabled, which fixes that bug.
Additionally, this also fixes a bug with the "online push notifications"
feature, which was, if someone were to:
* turn off notifications for PMs and mentions (`enable_offline_push_notifications`)
* turn on stream push notifications (`enable_stream_push_notifications`)
* turn on "online push" (`enable_online_push_notifications`)
then, they would still receive notifications for PMs when online.
This isn't how the "online push enabled" feature is supposed to work;
it should only act as a wrapper around the other notification settings.
The buggy code was this in `handle_push_notifications`:
```
if not (
receives_offline_push_notifications(user_profile)
or receives_online_push_notifications(user_profile)
):
return
// send notifications
```
This commit removes that code, and extends our `notification_data.py` logic
to cover this case, along with tests.
2. The name for these settings is slightly misleading. They essentially
talk about "what to send notifications for" (PMs and mentions), and not
"when to send notifications" (offline). This commit improves this condition
by restricting the use of this term only to the database field, and using
clearer names everywhere else. This distinction will be important to have
non-confusing code when we implement multiple options for notifications
in the future as dropdown (never/when offline/when offline or online, etc).
3. We should ideally re-check all notification settings just before the
notifications are sent. This is especially important for email notifications,
which may be sent after a long time after the message was sent. We will
in the future add code to thoroughly re-check settings before sending
notifications in a clean manner, but temporarily not re-checking isn't
a terrible scenario either.
This logic was peviously untested. This is a prep change for us
to completely depend on the logic here for the "read" flag, and
not on the `event_queue` code.
Anders Kaseorg
Daniil Fadeev
Lauryn Menard
Zixuan James Li
Alex Vandiver
Prakhar Pratyush
Alya Abbott
Josh Klar
Sahil Batra
khanhdq
sahil839
Adam Sah
Zixuan James Li
Hannah Salameh
Lauryn Menard
Tim Abbott
Steve Howell
Eeshan Garg
Abhijeet Prasad Bodas
akshatdalton
Hashir Sarwar