We do s/TOS/TERMS_OF_SERVICE/ on the name, and while we're at it,
remove the assumed zerver/ namespace for the template, which isn't
correct -- Zulip Cloud related content should be in the corporate/
directory.
If nginx was already installed, and we're using the webroot method of
initializing certbot, nginx needs to be reloaded. Hooks in
`/etc/letsencrypt/renewal-hooks/deploy/` do not run during initial
`certbot certonly`, so an explicit reload is required.
We now complain if a test author sends a stream message
that does not result in the sender getting a
UserMessage row for the message.
This is basically 100% equivalent to complaining that
the author failed to subscribe the sender to the stream
as part of the test setup, as far as I can tell, so the
AssertionError instructs the author to subscribe the
sender to the stream.
We exempt bots from this check, although it is
plausible we should only exempt the system bots like
the notification bot.
I considered auto-subscribing the sender to the stream,
but that can be a little more expensive than the
current check, and we generally want test setup to be
explicit.
If there is some legitimate way than a subscribed human
sender can't get a UserMessage, then we probably want
an explicit test for that, or we may want to change the
backend to just write a UserMessage row in that
hypothetical situation.
For most tests, including almost all the ones fixed
here, the author just wants their test setup to
realistically reflect normal operation, and often devs
may not realize that Cordelia is not subscribed to
Denmark or not realize that Hamlet is not subscribed to
Scotland.
Some of us don't remember our Shakespeare from high
school, and our stream subscriptions don't even
necessarily reflect which countries the Bard placed his
characters in.
There may also be some legitimate use case where an
author wants to simulate sending a message to an
unsubscribed stream, but for those edge cases, they can
always set allow_unsubscribed_sender to True.
These variables can be unset if the `os.path.exists` check fails.
That should be rare, since we've previously checked the files do
exist before getting here.
While races here are unlikely, it is most correct to enforce this
invariant at the database layer, and having a database-level
constraint makes the models file a bit more readable.
These are not considered to be "personal"
info, even if you upload them, so we
don't export them.
Generally the only folks who upload
these are admins, who can easily get
them in other ways. In fact, anybody
can get these via the app.
The certbot package installs its own systemd timer (and cron job,
which disabled itself if systemd is enabled) which updates
certificates. This process races with the cron job which Zulip
installs -- the only difference being that Zulip respects the
`certbot.auto_renew` setting, and that it passes the deploy hook.
This means that occasionally nginx would not be reloaded, when the
systemd timer caught the expiration first.
Remove the custom cron job and `certbot-maybe-renew` script, and
reconfigure certbot to always reload nginx after deploying, using
certbot directory hooks.
Since `certbot.auto_renew` can't have an effect, remove the setting.
In turn, this removes the need for `--no-zulip-conf` to
`setup-certbot`. `--deploy-hook` is similarly removed, as running
deploy hooks to restart nginx is now the default; pass
`--no-directory-hooks` in standalone mode to not attempt to reload
nginx. The other property of `--deploy-hook`, of skipping symlinking
into place, is given its own flog.
We've had a number of unhappy reports of upgrades failing due to
webpack requiring too much memory. While the previous commit will
likely fix this issue for everyone, it's worth improving the error
message for failures here.
We avoid doing the stop+retry ourselves, because that could cause an
outage in a production system if webpack fails for another reason.
Fixes#20105.
Since the upgrade to Webpack 5, we've been seeing occasional reports
that servers with roughly 4GiB of RAM were getting OOM kills while
running webpack.
Since we can't readily optimize the memory requirements for webpack
itself, we should raise the RAM requirements for doing the
lower-downtime upgrade strategy.
Fixes#20231.
We now ensure that all message ids are sorted BEFORE
we split them into batches.
We now do a few extra "slim" queries to get message
ids up front.
But, now, when we divide them into batches, we no
longer run 2 or 3 different complicated queries in
a loop. We just basically hydrate our message ids,
so `write_message_partials` should be easy to reason
about.
This change also means that for tiny realms with
< 1000 messages you will always have just one
json file, since we aggregate the ids from the
queries before batching.
This accomplishes a few things:
* It extracts `chunkify` rather than having us
clumsily track chunking-related stuff in a
big loop that is doing other stuff.
* It makes it so that all message ids
in message-000001.json < message-000002.json.
* It makes it easier for us to customize
the messages we send to a single user
(coming soon).
BTW we probably have a slicker version of chunkify
somewhere in our codebase, but I couldn't remember
where.
We recently changed /developer-community to /development-community.
Now that this change is in production, we can also migrate the
external links in our ReadTheDocs documentation.
We change the various "Up to N minutes" settings option labels to
"Custom", since the N is a little too mathy for some users.
Since the new prompts for the value of N are longer, we need to move
those prompts to the next line. Mainly this means switching from
`dependent-inline-block` to `dependent-block`, but we also need to
move the block out of the containing input-group for the CSS to be
happy.
Substantially rewritten by tabbott to use CSS for positioning and
change the message deleting copy of this issue.
Fixes#20177.
This avoids the somewhat confusing visuals of showing messages as
EDITED where the content had not been changed, which also obscured
situations where a message had both been edited and moved.
It's possible we could do better with some sort of fancier block-move
visual styling, but it's a bit tricky to do well given that we support
moving multiple messages at once.
Fixes#20451.
Following b3c58f454f, we want to clean up
old topics that may contain the disallowed characters. The Message table
is large, so we go in batches, making sure we limit topic fetches and
UPDATE query to no more than BATCH_SIZE Message rows per query.
Now all file writes go through our three
helper functions, and we consistently
write a single log message after the file
gets written.
I killed off write_message_exports, since
all but one of its callers can call
write_table_data, which automatically
sorts data. In particular, our Message
and UserMessage data will now be sorted
by ids.
As noted in the TODO that we delete with this commit, we never
implemented live-updated for edit history when moving a message to
another topic.
Implementing this involves somewhat ugly copy-paste of the logic for a
content edit, but structurally is pretty simple.
It also makes #20451 much more visible.
This probably just postpones the list creation until
Django builds the "IN" query, but semantically it's
good to work in sets where we don't have any
meaningful ordering of the list that gets used.
The immediate benefit of this is stronger mypy
checks (avoiding the ugly union caused by message
files).
The subsequent commit will add sorting.
We have test coverage on all these lines insofar
as if you comment out the lines, tests will
explode (i.e. more than superficial line
coverage).
The distinction here wasn't super meaningful
due to the way we order our "elif" statements,
but we want to reserver "normal_parent" for the
majority of use cases, where you simply tell
the Config what the "foreign_key" is.
For realm-wide exports, there is no reason to query
inefficiently against a list of modified users.
We move the Config out of the common child configs.
Even though Django usually treats foo__in
and foo_id__in identically for filters where
foo is a ForeignKey type, we want to insist
on somewhat more consistent syntax, because
we have the odd combo of type and type_id
in Recipient, where type_id is kinda like a
foreign key, but not a ForeignKey.
So we assert for now that all our include_rows
values end in "_id__in".
Tim Abbott
Alex Vandiver
Steve Howell
Aman Agrawal
odunybrad
Eeshan Garg
Archit Hadge
Swati Bhageria
Mateusz Mandera
Kevin
Alya Abbott