As explained in the comment, this is to prevent bugs where some strange
combination of codepaths could end up calling do_login without basic
validation of e.g. the subdomain. The usefulness of this will be
extended with the upcoming commit to add the ability to configure custom
code to wrap authenticate() calls in. This will help ensure that some
codepaths don't slip by the mechanism, ending up logging in a user
without the chance for the custom wrapper to run its code.
(cherry picked from commit 72bea3433e)
This test is ancient and patches so much that it's almost unreadable,
while being redundant considering we have comprehensive tests via the
SocialAuthBase subclasses. The one missing case was the one with the
backend we disabled. We replace that with a proper
test_social_auth_backend_disabled test in SocialAuthBase.
(cherry picked from commit e09c4d4d4b)
The original behavior of this setting was to disable LDAP
authentication for any realms not configured to use it. This was an
arbitrary choice, and its only value was to potentially help catch
typos for users who are lazy about testing their configuration.
Since it makes it a very inconvenient to potentially host multiple
organizations with different LDAP configurations, remove that
behavior.
This is a prep commit for adding feature of restricting
user access to guests such that we can keep the code
easy to read and understand when that feature is added.
This fixes a regression introduced in
9954db4b59, where the realm's default
language would be ignored for users created via API/LDAP/SAML,
resulting in all such users having English as their default language.
The API/LDAP/SAML account creation code paths don't have a request,
and thus cannot pull default language from the user's browser.
We have the `realm.default_language` field intended for this use case,
but it was not being passed through the system.
Rather than pass `realm.default_language` through from each caller, we
make the low-level user creation code set this field, as that seems
more robust to the creation of future callers.
This is an exception that we should be generally catching like the
others, which will give our standard /login/ redirect and proper logging
- as opposed to a 500 if we don't catch.
Addresses directly a bug we occurred in the wild, where a SAMLResponse
was submitted without issuers specified in a valid way, causing this
exception. The added test tests this specific type of scenario.
Failing to remove all of the rules which were added causes action at a
distance with other tests. The two methods were also only used by
test code, making their existence in zerver.lib.rate_limiter clearly
misplaced.
This fixes one instance of a mis-balanced add/remove, which caused
tests to start failing if run non-parallel and one more anonymous
request was added within a rate-limit-enabled block.
As the relevant comment elaborates - what happens next in the test in
simulating the step that happens in the desktop app. Thus a new session
needs to be used. Otherwise, the old session created normally in the
browser pollutes the state and can give falsely passing tests.
This should be happening for all social auth tests using this, not just
in that one SAML test, thus moving it inside the helper method.
This is a useful improvement in general for making correct
LogoutRequests to Idps and a necessary one to make SP-initiated logout
fully work properly in the desktop application. During desktop auth
flow, the user goes through the browser, where they log in through their
IdP. This gives them a logged in browser session at the IdP. However,
SAML SP-initiated logout is fully conducted within the desktop
application. This means that proper information needs to be given to the
the IdP in the LogoutRequest to let it associate the LogoutRequest with
that logged in session that was established in the browser. SessionIndex
is exactly the tool for that in the SAML spec.
This gives more flexibility on a server with multiple organizations and
SAML IdPs. Such a server can have some organizations handled by IdPs
with SLO set up, and some without it set up. In such a scenario, having
a generic True/False server-wide setting is insufficient and instead
being able to specify the IdPs/orgs for SLO is needed.
Closes#20084
This is the flow that this implements:
1. A logged-in user clicks "Logout".
2. If they didn't auth via SAML, just do normal logout. Otherwise:
3. Form a LogoutRequest and redirect the user to
https://idp.example.com/slo-endpoint?SAMLRequest=<LogoutRequest here>
4. The IdP validates the LogoutRequest, terminates its own user session
and redirects the user to
https://thezuliporg.example.com/complete/saml/?SAMLRequest=<LogoutResponse>
with the appropriate LogoutResponse. In case of failure, the
LogoutResponse is expected to express that.
5. Zulip validates the LogoutResponse and if the response is a success
response, it executes the regular Zulip logout and the full flow is
finished.
Previously, entering an organization via 'accounts/go' with the
web-public stream enabled took the user to the web-public view
even if the user was not logged in.
Now, a user is always redirected to the 'login_page' with
the next parameter, if present.
The 'login_page' view is updated to redirect an authenticated
user based on the 'next' parameter instead of always redirecting
to 'realm.uri'.
Fixes#23344.
So far, we've used the BitField .authentication_methods on Realm
for tracking which backends are enabled for an organization. This
however made it a pain to add new backends (requiring altering the
column and a migration - particularly troublesome if someone wanted to
create their own custom auth backend for their server).
Instead this will be tracked through the existence of the appropriate
rows in the RealmAuthenticationMethods table.
Adds the user ID to the return values for the `/fetch_api_key` and
`/dev_fetch_api_key` endpoints. This saves clients like mobile a
round trip to the server to get the user's unique ID as it is now
returned as part of the log in flow.
Fixes#24980.
In previous commits, we updated the realm creation flow to show
the realm name, type and subdomain fields in the first form
when asking for the email of the user. This commit updates the
user registration form to show the already filled realm details
as non-editable text and there is also a button to edit the
realm details before registration.
We also update the sub-heading for user registration form as
mentioned in the issue.
Fixes part of #24307.
This commits update the code to use user-level email_address_visibility
setting instead of realm-level to set or update the value of UserProfile.email
field and to send the emails to clients.
Major changes are -
- UserProfile.email field is set while creating the user according to
RealmUserDefault.email_address_visbility.
- UserProfile.email field is updated according to change in the setting.
- 'email_address_visibility' is added to person objects in user add event
and in avatar change event.
- client_gravatar can be different for different users when computing
avatar_url for messages and user objects since email available to clients
is dependent on user-level setting.
- For bots, email_address_visibility is set to EVERYONE while creating
them irrespective of realm-default value.
- Test changes are basically setting user-level setting instead of realm
setting and modifying the checks accordingly.
This adds a new endpoint /jwt/fetch_api_key that accepts a JWT and can
be used to fetch API keys for a certain user. The target realm is
inferred from the request and the user email is part of the JWT.
A JSON containing an user API key, delivery email and (optionally)
raw user profile data is returned in response.
The profile data in the response is optional and can be retrieved by
setting the POST param "include_profile" to "true" (default=false).
Co-authored-by: Mateusz Mandera <mateusz.mandera@zulip.com>
This will be useful for re-use for implementation of an endpoint for
obtaining the API by submitting a JWT in the next commits.
It's not a pure refactor, as it requires some tweaks to remote_user_jwt
behavior:
1. The expected format of the request is changed a bit. It used to
expect "user" and "realm" keys, from which the intended email was
just generated by joining with @. Now it just expects "email"
straight-up. The prior design was a bt strange to begin with, so this
might be an improvement actually.
2. In the case of the codepath of new user signup, this will no longer
pre-populate the Full Name in the registration form with the value
from the "user" key. This should be a very minor lost of
functionality, because the "user" value was not going to be a proper
Full Name anyway. This functionality can be restored in a future
commit if desired.
This is an API change, but this endpoint is nearly unused as far as
we're aware.
Black 23 enforces some slightly more specific rules about empty line
counts and redundant parenthesis removal, but the result is still
compatible with Black 22.
(This does not actually upgrade our Python environment to Black 23
yet.)
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Mateusz Mandera
Anders Kaseorg
Prakhar Pratyush
Tim Abbott
Alex Vandiver
Sahil Batra
Simon Michalke
Prakhar Pratyush
AcKindle3
Lauryn Menard
Alessandro Toppi