We already include the issue title in the topic. But if one chooses
to group all gitlab notifications under one topic, the message body
is misleading in the sense that only the Issue ID and the description
are displayed, not the title, which isn't super helpful if the topic
doesn't tell you the title either.
I think we should err on the side of always including the title in
the main message body, which is what this commit does.
Fixes#9913.
This migrates Zulip to use a dramatically better set of names and
aliases for our emoji set, defined in emoji_names.py (which is in turn
manually generated from our hand-curated CSV file).
This should significantly improve the experience of using Zulip's
emoji picker and emoji typeahead for finding what one is looking for.
Fixes#7665
In case of invitation events, 'invites_changed' event without
any real payload is sent to all the realm admins and the user.
The event is handled by reloading the list to view recent changes.
Commit tweaked by shubhamdhama:
* Send an `invite_changed` event when an user accept an invite.
Also, added the test for the same.
* No need to delete the invite list in frontend, current logic
handles the case when the invite data is changed properly.
* Extracted the common logic for sending an event into
`notify_invites_changed`.
Some of the arguments in our REST API have to be sent as JSON objects,
which only accept double quotes for strings.
If we display the examples as normal Python objects, the syntax would be
quite similar but it would use simple quotes, which is invalid JSON (and
isn't accepted by the server).
That's why all the examples should be JSON-serialized in order to comply
with the API's requirements.
Until now, we were displaying an empty "Arguments" section in the REST
API docs whenever an endpoint didn't use input arguments.
In the case of OpenAPI-based docs, that was also annoying because it
required removing the {generate_api_arguments_table|...} template tag or
leaving an empty "parameters" field in zulip.yaml.
After this, we show a paragraph indicating that the endpoint doesn't
need arguments under the "Arguments" section.
If the argument table generator isn't able to reach a file that is
supposed to read, the two most likely causes are:
- The source .md documentation file that is requesting the table has a
typo in the path.
- The file with the arguments isn't there, for some reason.
In either case, we don't want the server to fail silently-ish and
display the docs as if there was no arguments for that endpoint. That's
why the most logic thing to do is to raise an exception and let the
admins know that there's something wrong.
<script charset=…>, <script type=…>, and <style type=…> are “obsolete
but conforming” in HTML5. They make the validator.nu output noisier
and real problems a little harder to find.
(type was required in HTML 4, which is not relevant to us.)
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
POST and DELETE operations in /users/me/alert_words may leave the
user's list of alert words in an unknown state: POSTing adds words to a
list that the client may not know from the begining, and the same with
DELETE.
Replying with the current status of the alert words list is the best way
of letting the client alter the list and knowing its contents after
being updated with a single query.
This is especially useful taking into account that POSTing words that
were already present and DELETing non-existing words both produce a
successful response.
An extra test has been added to avoid leaving GET /users/me/alert_words
too untested.
Querying an endpoint with no information (thus a noop) and it producing
a successful response doesn't seem to be expected.
Given the case that the client makes such query with no content it will
probably be unintentional and the API should let them know about it.
For importing huddles we have to have unique huddle hashes.
Huddle hashes are extracted from the list of users participating
in a huddle. So to extract these user ids, we first use huddle
id to getting the matching recipient, and then we use subscription
to get the user ids from the recipient id.
Added tests for the same (tests slightly tweaked by tabbott).
The tests for GET /users were looking for a specific user, asuming that
it would always be in the same position. Since the users' sorting isn't
guaranteed in any way, this can lead to errors in the tests.
Now we make sure the user we grab from the list is the one we need by
checking its email address.
This is just a hotfix that addresses the short-term problem: we have
already made some efforts to make sure these tests are more
deterministic, and now we only need to finish the migration of the old
enpoints to the new system as a long-term solution.
This is all the plumbing that makes it possible to enable the
stream_email_notifications setting via the Zulip API. The flag still
doesn't do anything yet, but this is a nice checkpoint along the way
to implementing this feature.
This commit creates a new field called delivery_email. For now, it is
exactly the same as email upon user profile creation and should stay
that way even when email is changed, and is used only for sending
outgoing email from Zulip.
The purpose of this field is to support an upcoming option where the
existing `email` field in Zulip becomes effectively the user's
"display email" address, as part of making it possible for users
actual email addresses (that can receive email, stored in the
delivery_email field) to not be available to other non-administrator
users in the organization.
Because the `email` field is used in numerous places in display code,
in the API, and in database queries, the shortest path to implementing
this "private email" feature is to keep "email" as-is in those parts
of the codebase, and just set the existing "email" ("display email")
model field to be something generated like
"username@zulip.example.com" for display purposes.
Eventually, we'll want to do further refactoring, either in the form
of having both `display_email` and `delivery_email` as fields, or
renaming "email" to "username".
This commit adds a Markdown tree-processor extension that renders
multi-line code blocks that are nested inside lists with the
formatting. Note that the code block could be nested inside multiple
list levels and would still get rendered correctly.
Tim: This fixes the need for unpleasant workarounds like
f5bfa4e793 and makes nested code blocks
in our documentation look exactly how users would expect them to.
Given that we allow adding emoji reactions by only using the
emoji_name, we should offer the same possibility for removing
reactions to make the experience for API clients not require looking
up emoji codes.
Since this is an additional optional parameter, this also preserves
backward compatibility.
Complete, correct implementations of Zulip's emoji reactions API need
to send both emoji_code and emoji_name in order to add a reaction;
this is important for corner cases around clicking on a reaction in a
message that was first reacted to a year ago, when the emoji
name->code mappings have changed for the given code point in the
intervening time.
However, for folks building tools using the Zulip API, that corner
case is not particularly common; as a result, it makes sense to offer
an interface that allows adding a reaction by only specifying the
emoji name.
This is why the only field that needs to be required is emoji_name,
which can now be mapped to a single emoji. Both fields will be
necessary when "voting" an old reaction, but since we stil allow
specifying the two of them, these changes offer retrocompatibility.
This adds a new settings, SOCIAL_AUTH_SUBDOMAIN, which specifies which
domain should be used for GitHub auth and other python-social-auth
backends.
If one is running a single-realm Zulip server like chat.zulip.org, one
doesn't need to use this setting, but for multi-realm servers using
social auth, this fixes an annoying bug where the session cookie that
python-social-auth sets early in the auth process on the root domain
ends up masking the session cookie that would have been used to
determine a user is logged in. The end result was that logging in
with GitHub on one domain on a multi-realm server like zulipchat.com
would appear to log you out from all the others!
We fix this by moving python-social-auth to a separate subdomain.
Fixes: #9847.
* If `zerver_realmauditlog` is present in the exported data,
`RealmAuditLog` would be imported normally.
* If it is not present, `create_subscription_events`
function in would create the `subscription_created`
events for RealmAuditLog. The reason this function
is in `import_realm` module and not in the individual
export tool scripts (like Slack) is because this
function would be common for all export tools.
This fixes#9846 for users who have not already done an import of
their organization from Slack.
Fixes#9846.
Custom profile field value are stored in different structure compare to
other profile fields in events, so generic way to update fields wasn't
updating custom profile fields in `apply_event` function.
Fix this by adding check for custom fields in `apply_event`.
This also adds the appropriate test_events test to verify this code path.
Fixes part of #9875.
We extract out the logic for generating a list of all historical
topics for a given stream as a separate function. This avoids code
duplication when we add the similar code path for grabbing all topics
for web public streams.
This has two advantages;
* We can split bugdown/__init__.py into several modules, and each
module can access these arguments by importing these
* We get rid of the super-ugly `global db_data` construct, replacing
it with a only slightly ugly monkey-ish patching of the
`zerver.lib.bugdown.arguments` module, which is at least
considerably more clear on reading as to what it's purpose is.
The main remaining todo for correctly populating
RealmAuditLog.requires_billing_update is supporting the de-seating (and
corresponding re-seating) that happens after being offline for two weeks.
In this commit we are fixing a kinda serious un-noticed bug with
the way run_db_migrations worked for test db.
Basically run_db_migrations runs new migrations on db (dev or test).
When we talk about the dev platform this process is straight forward.
We have a single DB zulip which was once created and now has some data.
Introduction of new migration causes a schema change or does something
else but bottom line being we just migrate the zulip DB and stuff works
fine.
Now coming to zulip test db (zulip_test) situation is a bit complex
in comparision to dev db. Basically this is because we make use of
what we call zulip_test_template to make test fixture restoration
after tests run fast. Now before we introduced the performance
optimisation of just doing migrations when possible, introduction of
a migration would ideally result in provisioning do a full rebuild of
the test database. When that used to happen sequence of events used to
be something like this:
* Create a zulip_test db from zulip_test_base template (An absolute
basic schema holding)
* Migrate and populate the zulip_test db.
* Create/Re-create zulip_test_template from the latest zulip_test.
Now after we introduced just do migrations instead of full db rebuild
when possible, what used to happen was that zulip_test db got
successfully migrated but when test suites would run they would try to
create zulip_test from zulip_test_template (so that individual tests
don't affect each other on db level).
This is where the problem resides; zulip_test_template wasn't migrated
and we just scrapped zulip_test and re-created it using
zulip_test_template as a template and hence zulip_test will not hold the
latest schema.
This is what we fix in this commit.
This commit moves all files previously under the 'app' bundle in
the Django pipeline to being compiled by webpack under the 'app'
entry point. In the process, it moves assets under the app entry
to a file called app.js that consumes all relevant css and js files.
This commit also edits the webpack config to be able to expose certain
variables for third party libraries that are currently required by
some modules. This is bad coding form and should be refactored to
requiring whatever dependencies a module may have; we're just
deferring that to the future to simplify the series of transitions we
need to do here. The variable exposure is done using expose-loader in
webpack.
The app/index.html template is edited to override the newly introduced
'commonjs' block in the base template. This is done as a temporary
measure so as not to disrupt other pages on the app during the transition.
It also fixes the value of the 'this' context that was being inferred
as window by third party libraries. This is done using imports-loader
in the webpack config. This is also messy and probably isn't how we
want things to work long term.
We need to do a small monkey-patching of python-social-auth to ensure
that it doesn't 500 the request when a user does something funny in
their browser (e.g. using the back button in the auth flow) that is
fundamentally a user error, not a server error.
This was present in the pre-rewrite version of our Social auth
codebase, without clear documentation; I've fixed the explanation
part here.
It's perhaps worth investigating with the core social auth team
whether there's a better way to do this.
It's possible to make GitHub social authentication support letting the
user pick which of their verified email addresses to pick, using the
python-social-auth pipeline feature. We need to add an additional
screen to let the user pick, so we're not adding support for that now,
but this at least migrates this to use the data set of all emails that
have been verified as associated with the user's GitHub account (and
we just assume the user wants their primary email).
This also fixes the inability for very old GitHub accounts (where the
`email` field in the details might be a string the user wanted on
their GitHub profile page) to using GitHub auth to login.
Fixes#9127.
https://github.com/houstondatavis/slack-export/blob/master/users.json
JSON or JavaScript decodes "\/" to / (and some encoders always write
"\/" to avoid accidentally creating a </script> tag), while Python
assumes "\/" is a typo for "\\/" and decodes it to \/.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
The only changes visible at the AST level, checked using
https://github.com/asottile/astpretty, are
zerver/lib/test_fixtures.py:
'\x1b\\[(1|0)m' ↦ '\\x1b\\[(1|0)m'
'\\[[X| ]\\] (\\d+_.+)\n' ↦ '\\[[X| ]\\] (\\d+_.+)\\n'
which is fine because re treats '\\x1b' and '\\n' the same way as
'\x1b' and '\n'.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
This was technically a bug. For events that aren't unsupported
intentionally, the control should fall to the line that raises
UnknownWebhookEventType, and shouldn't be handled by anything else.
The events that are intentionally unsupported should be handled
more explicitly.
When GETting an unedited message's edit history, the server wasn't able
to reply properly and produced a 500 error.
Now when that happens, we return a message history that only contains
the original message.
Messages can be bulky, and storing them in a single
data structure can cause a memory error.
In this commit, the messages are written to a file
batch-wise, thus avoiding the memory error.
Previously, the messages where being stored in a output file from
outside the function 'convert_slack_workspace_messages', but
now we store it from the inside the mentioned function.
This will help in processing and saving the messages batch-wise
so as to avoid a memory error.
Reactions are returned separately from 'convert_slack_workspace_messages'
rather than 'message_json'.
Also updated test for 'convert_slack_workspace_messages' and an additional
test for reactions is added.
This fixes a test flake introduced here:
317a2fff2a
We need a higher bogus bot owner id to prevent
flakes where our userid sequence gets to 100. (Tests
aren't completely deterministic in what data you
use, since sequences don't get rolled back when
you roll back transactions.)
An estimated traffic of 0 suggests a stream is dead, and has pretty
different semantics from any non-zero value. So we should round up any
number between 0 and 1 to 1.
We don't ever use this value, but it's confusing to have the incorrect
calculation in the code.
Ideally we would set this to "None", but I don't know the code well enough
to be confident nothing would break.
Add 3 new Markdown emoji tests for newlines, emphasis, and links. The
goal of these tests is to ensure that Markdown operations concerning
emoji are preformed in proper order, with emoji being added correctly
based on other Markdown operations.
See suggestion here: https://git.io/flF5W.
The slash in command is stripped in the backend,
rather than in the client to make the client code
cleaner.
This would make client code cleaner in the slash
commands which include parameters.
Eeshan Garg
Harshit Bansal
Tim Abbott
Aastha Gupta
Yago González
Anders Kaseorg
Rhea Parekh
Sarah
Joshua Pan
Aditya Bansal
Vishnu Ks
Yashashvi Dave
Shubham Dhama
Rishi Gupta
Armaan Ahluwalia
Raymond Akornor
Lenny Jagielski
Steve Howell
Marco Burstein