This commit adds a Markdown tree-processor extension that renders
multi-line code blocks that are nested inside lists with the
formatting. Note that the code block could be nested inside multiple
list levels and would still get rendered correctly.
Tim: This fixes the need for unpleasant workarounds like
f5bfa4e793 and makes nested code blocks
in our documentation look exactly how users would expect them to.
It appears Luke's Dropbox folder/shared link that used to host some
tsearch_extras binaries was removed. It wasn't very high-value
regardless, because most of the platforms involved are deprecated, the
ones that don't generally have a PPA, and building from source is
pretty easy. So, we just remove these options from the documentation.
While we're at it, make clear we only support direct installation on
Ubuntu LTS.
Fixes#9863.
This was used for the very early-stage Zulip "ask for invite" form,
which was built around a stamped envelope concept. The form was
removed from Zulip a couple years ago in
bded0d9d54, but this CSS was missed in
the removal.
Given that we allow adding emoji reactions by only using the
emoji_name, we should offer the same possibility for removing
reactions to make the experience for API clients not require looking
up emoji codes.
Since this is an additional optional parameter, this also preserves
backward compatibility.
Complete, correct implementations of Zulip's emoji reactions API need
to send both emoji_code and emoji_name in order to add a reaction;
this is important for corner cases around clicking on a reaction in a
message that was first reacted to a year ago, when the emoji
name->code mappings have changed for the given code point in the
intervening time.
However, for folks building tools using the Zulip API, that corner
case is not particularly common; as a result, it makes sense to offer
an interface that allows adding a reaction by only specifying the
emoji name.
This is why the only field that needs to be required is emoji_name,
which can now be mapped to a single emoji. Both fields will be
necessary when "voting" an old reaction, but since we stil allow
specifying the two of them, these changes offer retrocompatibility.
We can now theoretically use this for any textarea
that supports our markdown (besides the compose box),
plus we keep the RTL code a bit more self-contained.
Joshua Pan
Eeshan Garg
Yago González
Rhea Parekh
Tim Abbott
Aditya Bansal
Cynthia Lin
Steve Howell