"check_add_user_group" is a safer helper function than
"create_user_group" to use when creating user_groups. It does
error handling and notify the client with the appropriate event.
Note that the populate_db command still uses "create_user_group"
because we do not need to enqueue events at that point.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Since this function creates a new user group into the database,
it is more appropriate to have it not as a generic "lib" function
but as an "action".
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
View that handled `PATCH user_groups/<int:user_group_id>` required
both name and description parameters to be passed. Due to this
clients had to pass values for both these parameters even if
one of them was changed.
To resolve this name description parameters to
`PATCH user_groups/<int:user_group_id>` are made optional.
Previously, test cases or clients accessing /json/ views using HTTP
Basic Auth would be accepted, while we intended to only allow clients
authenticated with a session cookie to access these views.
This adds a check on the accessed path to avoid this possibility.
It seems unlikely that any API clients clients were taking advantage
of this unintended quirk; so we're not going to bother documenting
this bug fix as an API change. In any case, it should be trivial for
anyone affected to consult the documentation and then switch their
/json/foo URL to a correct /api/v1/foo URL.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Although our POST /messages handler accepts the ‘to’ parameter with or
without JSON encoding, there are two problems with passing it as an
unencoded string.
Firstly, you’d fail to send a message to a stream named ‘true’ or
‘false’ or ‘null’ or ‘2022’, as the JSON interpretation is prioritized
over the plain string interpretation.
Secondly, and more importantly for our tests, it violates our OpenAPI
schema, which requires the parameter to be JSON-encoded. This is
because OpenAPI has no concept of a parameter that’s “optionally
JSON-encoded”, nor should it: such a parameter cannot be unambiguously
decoded for the reason above.
Our version of openapi-core doesn’t currently detect this schema
violation, but after the next upgrade it will.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
We now use EVERYONE_GROUP_NAME instead of writing
the actual group name at multiple places, so that we
can have all the group names coded at one place only.
We now use MEMBERS_GROUP_NAME instead of writing
the actual group name at multiple places, so that we
can have all the group names coded at one place only.
We now use MODERATORS_GROUP_NAME instead of writing
the actual group name at multiple places, so that we
can have all the group names coded at one place only.
We now use ADMINISTRATORS_GROUP_NAME instead of writing
the actual group name at multiple places, so that we can
have all the group names coded at one place only.
We now use OWNERS_GROUP_NAME instead of writing
the actual group name at multiple places, so that
we can have all the group names coded at one place
only.
We now use EVERYONE_ON_INTERNET_GROUP_NAME instead of
writing the actual group name at multiple places, so
that we can have all the group names coded at one place
only.
We now use FULL_MEMBERS_GROUP_NAME instead of
writing the actual full members system group
name at multiple places, so that we can have
all the group names coded at one place only.
This commit modifies bulk_create_users to add the users to the
respective system groups. And due to this change, now bots in
development environment are also added to system groups.
Tests are changed accordingly as more UserGroupMembeship objects
are created.
Since we include internal realms while creating system groups
in "0382_create_role_based_system_groups.py", we should do it
when creating new internal realms as well to be consistent.
Tests are changed accordingly as UserGroup objects are created.
We also change the user group ids used in api docs examples
such that user groups are of correct realm.
This commit adds 'GET /user_groups/{user_group_id}/members'
endpoint to get members of a user group. "direct_member_only"
parameter can be passed as True to the endpoint to get only
direct members of the user group and not the members of
subgroup.
This commit adds 'GET /user_groups/{id}/members/{id}' endpoint to check
whether a user is member of a group.
This commit also adds for_read parameter to access_user_group_by_id,
which if passed as True will provide access to read user group even
if it a system group or if non-admin acting user is not part of the
group.
This commits adds is_user_in_group function
which can be used to check whether a user
is part of a user group or not. It also
supports recursive parameter for including
the members of all the subgroups as well.
This commit also adds 'subgroups' field to the user_group present
in the event sent on creating a user group. We do not allow passing
the subgroups while creating a user group as of this commit, but added
the field in the event object to pass tests.
This commit adds a cron job which runs every hour to add the users to
full members system group if user is promoted to a full member.
This should ensure that full member status is available no more than
an hour after configuration suggests it should be.
This commit adds users to the appropriate system user group
based on their role. We also change the user groups when
changing role of the user.
We also add migration to add existing users to the appropriate
user groups.
This commit adds update_users_in_full_members_system_group which
is currently used to update the full members group on changing
role of a user. This function will be modified in next commit such
that it can be used to update full members group on changing
waiting_period_threshold setting of realm.
Removes `client` parameter from backend tests using the
`POST /messages` endpoint when the test can use the default
`User-Agent` as the client, which is set to `ZulipMobile` for API
requests and a browser user agent string for web app requests.
We should use more selective query for UserGroupMembership
objects in tests for checking adding and removing members.
This is done by checking the membership counts for the
particular user group only.
This will help in keeping the tests more understandable
after we add members to the role-based system groups,
since that would create a lot of membership objects.
We make the UserGroup queries in user group creation and
deletion tests more selective by fitering the user groups
which belong to the realm and not the one included in
lear realm, etc.
This will help us to keep the tests more understandable
when the counts of UserGroup increases due to addition of
system groups. There is no need to consider system groups
of other realms in these tests.
This is a prep commit for new permissions model in
which a user group would be able to have a subgroup.
This commit renames get_memberships_of_users to
get_direct_memberships_of_users to specify that
the function is used only to fetch the direct
memberships and not memberships of subgroups of
the direct group.
Extracted this commit from #19866.
Co-authored-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This is a prep commit for new permissions model in which a user
group would be able to have a subgroup.
This commit renames get_user_groups to get_direct_user_groups
to specify that the function is used only to fetch the direct
groups that user is part of and not subgroups of the direct
group.
Extracted this commit from #19866.
Co-authored-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
We do not allow any user to edit the system user groups (including
renaming, deleting, adding or removing members, etc.) from the
API. These user groups will change only by the code when a new
user is added or role of a user is changed.
This is implemented by rejecting access_user_group_by_id always
except the case when it is use to get the user group for sending
email and push notifications, as we would need to send notifications
to the mentioned user group.
This fixes a batch of mypy errors of the following format:
'Item "None" of "Optional[Something]" has no attribute "abc"
Since we have already been recklessly using these attritbutes
in the tests, adding assertions beforehand is justified presuming
that they oughtn't to be None.
This commit adds moderators and full members options for
user_group_edit_policy by using COMMON_POLICY_TYPES.
Moderators do not require to be a member of user group in
order to edit or remove the user group if they are allowed
to do so according to user_group_edit_policy.
But full members need to be a member of user group to edit
or remove the user group.
There is no need to have a error message which specifies the
roles having permission to edit user-groups, we can simply
have error message as "Insufficient permission" as we already
show the roles having permission clearly in UI.
This helper will be used to check whether
the user is allowed to edit user groups or
not. Currently it is not used, but will
be used in next commit where we will
refactor the user_group_edit_policy to use
COMMON_POLICY_TYPES.
Zixuan James Li
m-e-l-u-h-a-n
Anders Kaseorg
Sahil Batra
Lauryn Menard
PIG208
sahil839
Abhijeet Prasad Bodas