It looks like this ritual was born when a type comment wasn’t working
because it was mistyped without the colon.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>'
This finds three sets of related settings to extract from the
"Miscellaneous" settings section:
- Service configuration (PostgreSQL, RabbitMQ, Redis, Memcached)
- Previews (image, URL, and Twitter)
- Logging and error reporting
Adds a "unstar messages in topic foo" option to the topic sidebar
popover, if there are any starred messages in that topic, known
to the frontend.
Altered existing "unstar all messages" confirmation modal to mention
the topic name, in the case that it was opened by the topic sidebar
codepath.
This is just a v1, and will not unstar old messages from that
topic, if they have not been fetched by the frontend.
Fixes#12194
Co-authored-by: Abhijeet Bodas <abhijeetbodas2001@gmail.com>
A few internal fields used for tracking which types of notifications
have already been sent for a given message, like `hander_id` and the
`push_notified` bundle of fields were being incorrectly included in
message events delivered to clients clients.
One could argue these fields might be useful hints to clients, but
because notifications can be triggered later on via
`missedmessage_hook`, they have no useful purpose in the API.
This commit move these extended event field on a `internal_data`
object within the event object, and delete this field in `contents()`
for call points that would serve data to clients.
Tweaked by tabbott to provide a cleaner interface.
We're not bumping API_FEATURE_LEVEL because these fields have always
been documented as being present only due to a bug, so no clients
should be expecting or relying on them.
Fixes: #15947.
This splits the one big `run_test` block into
add/edit/delete parts, for better clarity.
This also removes the `with_field` calls and
uses the override style instead, which is
preferred because it makes sure the stubbed
function is actually called.
This commit replaces `with_field` calls to
use the override style instead.
`override` is preferred since it makes sure
the stubbed function is actually called,
while `with_field` doesn't, which makes it
hard to spot dead code.
This document is mainly an answer to a set of questions other
developers have been asking about Zulip's architecture and scalability
design. It's intended for developers working on Zulip, to help with
thinking about where to prioritize further efforts to optimize
scalability.
This commit replaces all `with_stub` calls and
explicitly calls `make_stub` instead.
The `with_stub` helper does not add much clarity
hence we now use scoped stub objects instead.
This de-indents some blocks where scoping isn't
required, for example when there is a single
stub object inside a `run_test` function.
With this change, we also need to explicitly
assert `num_calls`.
This is required for unattended upgrades to actually run regularly.
In some distributions, it may be found in 20auto-upgrades, but placing
it here makes it more discoverable.
Match the order of the variables between `default_settings.py` and
`settings.py`, and move the defaults into `default_settings.py` so
the section does not require any uncommented lines in `settings.py` if
LDAP is not in use.
We can relax this restriction in the future, but
basically every time it came up for me, the test
code was just disorganized, or it had an easy
workaround.
These are still kind of a mess.
The old code combined the worst of both worlds:
- we had one monolithic test
- we called the events multiple times,
verifying a different stub each time
Now I make the tests more granular.
We could actually re-combine the tests, but
in a nicer way, so that we just set
up multiple stubs and verify that all stubs
get correctly invoked.
There is also some code cleanup here--in dispatch_subs,
we don't stub stream_data, so it's easier to write
deeper tests that actually validate the data changes.
Anders Kaseorg
Tim Abbott
Alex Vandiver
Nikhil Maske
Abhishek-Balaji
Shanu
Abhijeet Prasad Bodas
Steve Howell
Nishant Mittal