When one resizes the window and tries to switch to the vertical
sidebar menu, the CSS transition flickers in and out. This is
less than ideal.
This commit implements a solution to this problem. The solution is
inspired by the following helpful article:
https://ishadeed.com/article/layout-flickering/
We found a bug in our top-level nav on certain Samsung phones where
tapping on the dropdowns didn't do anything. As it turns out, trying
to figure out whether touch is enabled on a device using CSS media
queries such as `(hover: none)` is very tricky business! While it
may work on some devices, it may break spectacularly on others.
This commit presents a potential solution to this. Media queries
about widths are a lot more device-independent than hover media
queries. So, this is what we do now:
- We fire click events regardless of whether the top-level nav is in
the vertical sidebar orientation or the horizontal orientation.
Since we are no longer dependent on hover media queries for click
events, this fixes the mobile bug mentioned above because taps or
clicks will always work regardless of device.
- The mouseover/mouseout events are only fired when the header is
in the horizontal orientation and the primary input mechanism
supports hovering over elements. This allows us to support hovering
over menus on desktop. However, since mouseout/mouseover events are
irrelevant for mobile, we are fine on that front since clicks/taps
will still work.
NOTE that the above approach also takes care of weird edge cases where
you have a horizontal orientation on a device such as the iPad Pro that
is flipped in the horizontal position. Since clicks work anyway, these
edge cases are largely taken care of.
Right now, some of our horizontally spaced out top-level dropdowns
(such as "Solutions") get truncated on screen widths less than
1024 px. We switch to the vertical sidebar menu at widths less than
686px.
Looking at a lot of mainstream websites, a few of them switch to a
vertical sidebar menu on much wider widths than we do. Plus,
switching to a vertical orientation is a much cleaner way to fix
this issue than playing around with legacy Bootstrap code. Therefore,
we should toggle on the sidebar menu at width <= 1024px.
Commit 9049fb3bd4 (#19176) broke these
by changing {page_params} to {...page_params}. We could change it
back, but it’s better to be explicit about which items we use from
page_params.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This commit makes the compose.update_fade as an exported
function and adds the listener to update the fade manually
as deleting the pill was not calling this functions.
Fixes#18865
Closes#19287
This endpoint allows submitting multiple addresses so we need to "weigh"
the rate limit more heavily the more emails are submitted. Clearly e.g.
a request triggering emails to 2 addresses should weigh twice as much as
a request doing that for just 1 address.
Previously, the output would make it look like we sent an actual email
to the first user in the dry_run output, which is very confusing.
The `dry_run` code path already prints all the accounts that would
have been emailed at the end, so there's no reason to have this line
before the dry_run check.
Additionally, we move after the `get_connection` check because
failures at that stage shouldn't result in logging an attempt to send
an email.
This way we can stop reading as soon as we get to the body. Also,
send an Accept header, check that the request was actually successful,
use lxml.etree.iterparse instead of a broken hand-rolled state
machine, and support XHTML, all for negative 28 lines of code.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
While it should be an invariant that message.rendered_content is never
None for a row saved to the database, it is possible for that
invariant to be violated, likely including due to bugs in previous
versions of data import/export tools.
While it'd be ideal for such messages to be rendered to fix the
invariant, it doesn't make sense for this has_link migration to crash
because of such a corrupted row, so we apply the similar policy we
already have for rendered_content="".
We want to avoid passing opaque messages around to
low-level functions that only need certain fields.
This sets us up to handle mark-as-unread messages
that aren't necessarily full messages.
We only care about ~8 fields from a Zulip message
when we're tracking unread counts. For example, we
don't care about the "content" field. This also sets
us up to pull up the "display_recipient" logic in an
upcoming commit.
We rework the landing page for companies in the same way we've
recently revamped the landing pages for other use cases.
This implementation unfortunately duplicates a lot of content from
/plans; we should clean that up at some point.
This reverts commit 1965584eec.
This syntax has a bad interaction with table syntax and needs to be
rethought.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Alya Abbott
Eeshan Garg
Anders Kaseorg
Priyam Seth
Mateusz Mandera
Tim Abbott
tushar912
Vishnu KS
Priyansh Garg
Iam-VM
Steve Howell
Aman Agrawal
Alex Vandiver
Riken Shah
Gaurav Pandey