There’s an apparent contradiction between RFC 7230 §3.3.2
Content-Length:
“A server MUST NOT send a Content-Length header field in any response
with a status code of 1xx (Informational) or 204 (No Content).”
and RFC 7231 §4.3.7 OPTIONS:
“A server MUST generate a Content-Length field with a value of "0" if
no payload body is to be sent in the response.”
The only resolution within the existing language would be to disallow
all 204 responses to OPTIONS requests. However, I don’t think that
was the intention, so I submitted this erratum report:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5806
and updated the code accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
Introduced by #12966.
puppet/zulip/manifests/base.pp - WARNING: double quoted string containing no variables on line 93
puppet/zulip/manifests/base.pp - WARNING: string containing only a variable on line 93
scanf doesn’t accept a number as input, so uh, add a dummy space
character.
What. You can’t give me a bad language and then complain when I write
bad programs in it.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
Apparently, our edit-message events did not guarantee that the outer
wrapper dictionary, which is intended to be unique for each client,
was unique for every client (instead only ensuring it was unique for
each user).
This led to clients unexpectedly getting last_event_id validation
errors in this code path when a user had multiple connected clients,
because the linear ordering of event IDs within a given queue was
corrupted.
In fd2a63b049, we accidentally fixed
this issue with a different set of userdata events, without fixing the
edit-message event bug. This commit fixes the remaining issue.
tools/linter_lib/pyflakes.py:35: error: Argument 3 to "run_pyflakes" has incompatible type "List[Tuple[bytes, bytes]]"; expected "List[Tuple[str, str]]"
tools/linter_lib/custom_check.py:110: error: Argument "rules" to "RuleList" has incompatible type "List[Dict[str, Any]]"; expected "List[Rule]"
tools/linter_lib/custom_check.py:214: error: Argument "rules" to "RuleList" has incompatible type "List[Dict[str, Any]]"; expected "List[Rule]"
tools/linter_lib/custom_check.py:214: error: Argument "shebang_rules" to "RuleList" has incompatible type "List[Dict[str, Any]]"; expected "List[Rule]"
tools/linter_lib/custom_check.py:502: error: Argument "rules" to "RuleList" has incompatible type "List[Dict[str, Any]]"; expected "List[Rule]"
tools/linter_lib/custom_check.py:502: error: Argument "shebang_rules" to "RuleList" has incompatible type "List[Dict[str, Any]]"; expected "List[Rule]"
tools/linter_lib/custom_check.py:519: error: Argument "rules" to "RuleList" has incompatible type "List[Dict[str, Any]]"; expected "List[Rule]"
tools/linter_lib/custom_check.py:706: error: Argument "rules" to "RuleList" has incompatible type "List[Dict[str, Any]]"; expected "List[Rule]"
tools/linter_lib/custom_check.py:728: error: Argument "rules" to "RuleList" has incompatible type "List[Dict[str, Any]]"; expected "List[Rule]"
tools/linter_lib/custom_check.py:738: error: Argument "rules" to "RuleList" has incompatible type "List[Dict[str, Any]]"; expected "List[Rule]"
tools/linter_lib/custom_check.py:779: error: Argument "rules" to "RuleList" has incompatible type "List[Dict[str, Any]]"; expected "List[Rule]"
tools/linter_lib/custom_check.py:779: error: Argument "length_exclude" to "RuleList" has incompatible type "Set[str]"; expected "List[str]"
tools/linter_lib/custom_check.py:803: error: Argument "length_exclude" to "RuleList" has incompatible type "Set[str]"; expected "List[str]"
tools/linter_lib/custom_check.py:805: error: Unsupported operand types for + ("List[Rule]" and "List[Dict[str, Any]]")
tools/linter_lib/custom_check.py:819: error: Argument "rules" to "RuleList" has incompatible type "List[Dict[str, Any]]"; expected "List[Rule]"
These were missed the `zulint` package was missing PEP 561 type
annotation markers, and if it’d had them, mypy daemon mode would’ve
required us to set `follow_imports = skip` for it.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
Fixes this warning:
Warning: The string '8167976' was automatically coerced to the numerical value 8167976 (file: /root/zulip/puppet/zulip/manifests/base.pp, line: 93, column: 19)
Fixes#9682.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
The `users/me/subscriptions` endpoint accidentally started returning
subscriber information for each stream. This is convenient, but
unnecessarily costly for those clients which either don't need it
(most API apps) or already acquire this information via /register
(including Zulip's apps).
This change removes that data set from the default response. Clients
which had come to rely on it, or would like to rely on it in future,
may still access it via an additional documented API parameter.
Fixes#12917.
Use a decorator called openapi_test_function instead of the hard-coded
TEST_FUNCTIONS list for increased readability and maintainablity (at
the cost of performance).
Added the `.white-box` in order to be consistent with (`/accounts/go/`,
`/login`). Changed the class of the text under the white box so all the
text under white box uses the same styling.
I added the `white-box` as it was in the other similar pages
(`/accounts/go`).
In order to be able to style it better, I removed the buttons and added
`div`s instead, then added click handler for submitting the form.
If the email is associated to a Zulip account, the avatar of the account
is displayed and the text `Log in`, otherwize a `+` sign is
displayed and the text `Create new account`.
I changed the class of the title in order to use the same styling as the
other similar pages (like `/accounts/go` or `/login`).
Changed the related test.
For the emails that are associated to an existing account in an
organisation, the avatars will be displayed in the email selection
page. This includes avatar data in what is passed to the page.
Added `avatar_urls` to the context in `test_templates.py`.
Apparently GitHub changed the email address for these; we need to
update our code accordingly.
One cannot receive emails on the username@users.noreply.github.com, so
if someone tries creating an account with this email address, that
person would not be able to verify the account.
Fixes: #2734.
`local_id` was being transmitted to the server as a string by the AJAX
transmission path, and as a number by by the WebSocket transmission
path. Then, one of the two racing success callback paths would use
the original number, while the other would use the type returned by
the server. Depending on which transmission path was used and which
callback path won the race, `reify_message_id` would sometimes be
passed a string that would fail to compare equal to the numerical
selection id. If the locally echoed message was selected, this would
cause the selection to disappear.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
Anders Kaseorg
Tim Abbott
Priyank Patel
meiomorphism
Hemanth V. Alluri
Alexandra Ciobica
Vaibhav