When user presses escape but there is no action that recent topics
can perform on it, it returns false.
The final state of focus is the focus on topics table. If the focus
is on table and not on RT search or filters, we return false to
indicate that the key was unhandled by recent topics.
This will allow escape to take user to another view if recent topics
is not the default view.
In the documentation of the "Sending messages," path for the `check_message` and `do_send_message` function is not provided. So, I added the path of both for future contributors.
Redis is not nagios, and this only leads to confusion as to why there
is a nagios domain setting on frontend servers; it also leaves the
`redis0` part of the name buried in the template.
Switch to an explicit variable for the redis hostname.
The query string parameter authentication method is now deprecated for
newly created Slack applications since the 24th of February[1]. This
causes Slack imports to fail, claiming that the token has none of the
required scopes.
Two methods can be used to solve this problem: either include the
authentication token in the header of an HTTP GET request, or include
it in the body of an HTTP POST request. The former is preferred, as
the code was already written to use HTTP GET requests.
Change the way the parameters are passed to the "requests.get" method
calls, to pass the token via the `Authorization` header.
[1] https://api.slack.com/changelog/2020-11-no-more-tokens-in-querystrings-for-newly-created-appsFixes: #17408.
We want to be careful about MIT code, as it leads
to more lax checks in the filter code.
And then we just use with_field in a couple places
and clear subscriptions.
For most functions that we were using __Rewire__ for,
it's better to just use the override helper, which
use __Rewire__ under the hood, but also resets
the reference at the end of run_tests.
Another nice thing about override() is that it reports
when you never actually needed the mock, and this
commit fixes the instances found here.
I didn't replace every call to __Rewire__. The
remaining ones fall under these categories:
* I looked for ") =>" in my code sweep,
so I missed stuff like "noop" helpers.
* Sometimes we directly update something
in a module that's not a function. This
is generally evil, and we should use setters.
* Some tests have setup() helpers or similar
that complicated this code sweep, so I
simply punted.
* Somes modules rely on intra-test leaks. We
should fix those, but I just punted for the
main code sweep.
I now let folks override the same target multiple
times inside of `with_overrides` (and then indirectly
inside of `run_test`.)
I may re-impose this restriction in the future, since
most violations are due to code smells, but there are
a few legitimate use cases for this, and the code
can handle it, plus I want to remove some other
ugliness first.
This is a deceptively ugly diff. It makes
the actual code way more tidy.
I basically inlined some calls to mock_module
and put some statements in lexical order.
We now just use a module._load hook to inject
stubs into our code.
For conversion purposes I temporarily maintain
the API of rewiremock, apart from the enable/disable
pieces, but I will make a better wrapper in an
upcoming commit.
We can detect when rewiremock is called after
zrequire now, and I fix all the violations in
this commit, mostly by using override.
We can also detect when a mock is needlessly
created, and I fix all the violations in this
commit.
The one minor nuisance that this commit introduces
is that you can only stub out modules in the Zulip
source tree, which is now static/js. This should
not really be a problem--there are usually better
techniques to deal with third party depenencies.
In the prior commit I show a typical workaround,
which is to create a one-line wrapper in your
test code. It's often the case that you can simply
use override(), as well.
In passing I kill off `reset_modules`, and I
eliminated the second argument to zrequire,
which dates back to pre-es6 days.
I created this test in Jan 2019 with
6b7a4f8611.
At the time I created this we were still migrating modules
over from using the $(() => {...}) style of initialization,
so the test served a purpose as an easy smoke test that we
weren't doing something really stupid in
ui_init.initialize().
Now that that migration is complete, the test's warts start
to outweigh its benefits. Because it's just a smoke test,
we get credit for artificial line coverage where we're
exercising code without actually verifying anything other
than that it runs without crashing.
There are still possibilities for bugs within
ui_init.initialize() where we initialize modules in the
wrong sequence, but I am not confident that the node test
would catch them with any more likelihood (or clarity) than
either the puppeteer tests or czo bug reports.
And then on top of that, the zjquery setup in the node test
is hard to maintain. It's also hard to verify that some
of the setup isn't cruft.
If you want to see how much of a maintenance headache this
has been in recent times, just look at how many of the
recent commits have been related to things like es6
migrations or code cleanup sweeps.
We should just kill it.
Aman Agrawal
Anders Kaseorg
Steve Howell
Alex Vandiver
Sourabh
Gaurav Pandey
Cyril Pletinckx
Nikhil Maske
sahil839
Sumanth V Rao
Tim Abbott