Several integration docs instruct the user to create a bot, but don't
specify that the type of bot should be "Incoming webhook".
Renames create-a-bot.md -> create-an-incoming-webhook.md for clarity,
and replaces all incomplete instructions with this macro.
Renames bot_types.png -> bot_types_incoming_webhook.png and updates
the image with a screenshot of the latest UI.
The Yo company shut down in 2016.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yo_(app)#History
Removes `yo` instances from `zerver/lib/integrations.py`.
Removes `zerver/webhooks/yo`.
Removes `static/images/integrations/yo-app`.
Since the setup for uptimerobot does not deviate from what we have in
the "create-bot-construct-url" macro, we can reuse it and event
filtering instructions for uptimerobot will be automatically included.
TODO: Add event filtering documentation for buildbot when it supports
custom endpoint URL.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This commit strengthens types by typing the Solano webhook's incoming
payload as WildValue, which eradicates the use of Any within the
incoming webhook integration.
The KeyError exception has been replaced to catch a ValidationError
instead now, since the incoming payload's keys will be tamed before
usage and the non-existence of the key is raised as a
ValidationError in the taming function.
This commit strengthens types by typing the webhook's incoming
payload as WildValue and taming the values of the payload before
usage, which eradicates the use of Any within the UptimeRobot
incoming webhook integration.
The payload's values are now tamed, stored in variables and passed
into message templates as opposed to passing in the payload dict as
keyword arguments.
The KeyError exception has been replaced to catch a ValidationError
instead now, since the incoming payload's keys will be tamed before
usage and the non-existence of the key is raised as a
ValidationError in the taming function.
This commit strengthens types by typing the webhook's incoming
payload as WildValue, which eradicates the use of Any within the
Zabbix incoming webhook integration.
The KeyError exception has been replaced to catch a ValidationError
instead now, since the incoming payload's keys will be tamed before
usage and the non-existence of the key is raised as a
ValidationError in the taming function.
This commit checks for null values for keys within "attachment" in
the Slack integration's incoming payloads. These keys were expected
to exist optionally previously, and the existence of null values for
these wasn't anticipated. Due to an issue report for such null
values in the payload, their handling is updated appropriately.
The checks for these values are truthiness checks since the strategy
for these values being null or falsy ("", 0) is the same; we don't
process that key-value pair. This is consistent with how Slack handles
this scenario.
For the case where all the attachment fields have null values, Slack
displays this as an empty block with no content, and therefore our
strategy for this is a no-op.
Tests updated.
This is a follow-up to #19274. We map the supported event types to a
more suitable format for events.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Now that we can assume Python 3.6+, we can use the
email.headerregistry module to replace hacky manual email address
parsing.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Newrelic updated the payload that's sent via the webhook incoming call
causing a bug in the newrelic webhook endpoint.
This fixes the bug by updating the endpoint to respect the new format
of the payload as well as the old format. This should be updated once
the old format is EOLed.
Fixes#22338.
Updates `git-webhook-url-with-branches.md` (and two files that use
that file as an include link) for some of the follow-ups from #22315
to the Markdown parser. With this fix, all integrations docs that
reference this file as an include link should render the url as a
div element with `.codehilite` class.
This is a prep commit for tightening the types for our wrapped test
client.
The callers of the test client methods are refactored to either call
them without unpacking at all or create a TypedDict for the keyword
arguments to be unpacked. This allows the type checker to know exactly what
keys are present and their corresponding type.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
markdown-include is GPL licensed.
Also, rewrite it as a block processor, so that it works correctly
inside indented blocks.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
‘stream_name’ is not a cromulent keyword argument for client_post(),
‘unknown_action’ is malformed application/x-www-form-urlencoded, and
these two tests were duplicates of each other with different comments.
I’m not sure what they were intended to test, but here’s a guess.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
94457732c1 changed this from:
```py
event_name = payload.get("event_name", payload.get("object_kind")).tame(check_string)
```
...to:
```py
event_name = payload.get("event_name", payload["object_kind"]).tame(check_string)
```
Which causes a failure when `event_name` exists but `object_kind` does
not, since the default is evaluated first.
Switch to an `if` statement to clarify the fallbacks better.
slack_incoming webhook previously used has_request_variables to
extract payload from HttpRequest object first, before trying to
access HttpRequest.body again in view.py. This caused an error
when one sends a request without payload - it is forbidden to
read from request data stream twice.
Instead of relying on has_request_variables, this PR extracts
payload depending on content type in view.py directly to avoid
reading request data stream twice.
Fixes#19056.
As a consequence:
• Bump minimum supported Python version to 3.8.
• Move Vagrant environment to Ubuntu 20.04, which has Python 3.8.
• Move CI frontend tests to Ubuntu 20.04.
• Move production build test to Ubuntu 20.04.
• Move 3.4 upgrade test to Ubuntu 20.04.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
The documentation at https://api.beeminder.com/#goal says this is
“number”; empirically, we do in fact get decimal points.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>