This prep step is mostly for diff hygiene; the next
commit will make the code a bit nicer.
The original code here had the nice property that
most (but not all) of the DB work happened up
front in `handle_digest_email`, and none of the
DB work was delegated to the callers. But I
prefer the tradeoff of making the helpers a bit
more cohesive--let them get the data they need.
And we have query-count coverage in our tests,
so there's no real danger of having helpers
down in the stack insidiously doing a bunch of
extra DB hops.
In 709493cd75 (Feb 2017)
I added code to render_markdown that re-fetched the
sender of the message, to detect whether the message is
a bot.
It's better to just let the ORM fetch this. The
message object should already have sender.
The diff makes it look like we are saving round trips
to the database, which is true in some cases. For
the main message-send codepath, though, we are only
saving a trip to memcached, since the middleware
will have put our sender's user object into the
cache. The test_message_send test calls internally
to check_send_stream_message, so it was actually
hitting the database in render_markdown (prior to
my change).
Before this change we were clearing the cache on
every SQL usage.
The code to do this was added in February 2017
in 6db4879f9c.
Now we clear the cache just one time, but before
the action/request under test.
Tests that want to count queries with a warm
cache now specify keep_cache_warm=True. Those
tests were particularly flawed before this change.
In general, the old code both over-counted and
under-counted queries.
It under-counted SQL usage for requests that were
able to pull some data out of a warm cache before
they did any SQL. Typically this would have bypassed
the initial query to get UserProfile, so you
will see several off-by-one fixes.
The old code over-counted SQL usage to the extent
that it's a rather extreme assumption that during
an action itself, the entries that you put into
the cache will get thrown away. And that's essentially
what the prior code simulated.
Now, it's still bad if an action keeps hitting the
cache for no reason, but it's not as bad as hitting
the database. There doesn't appear to be any evidence
of us doing something silly like fetching the same
data from the cache in a loop, but there are
opportunities to prevent second or third round
trips to the cache for the same object, if we
can re-structure the code so that the same caller
doesn't have two callees get the same data.
Note that for invites, we have some cache hits
that are due to the nature of how we serialize
data to our queue processor--we generally just
serialize ids, and then re-fetch objects when
we pop them off the queue.
The visual noise from the blue border has bothered me forever and I
finally decided to do something about it. I don't know if this is the
best solution, but I do think it's a lot better than the status quo!
This prevents Zulip CI from eventually consuming large amounts of
storage on one's GitHub account.
I picked a longer retention period for the Puppeteer artifacts because
humans look at those; the production tarballs are unlikely to be used
10 minutes after the run completes as they are just for the next stage
fo the build; certainly 14 days seems ample for any debugging.
The passwords generated for our development environment / test suite
include the `+` character, which needs to be quoted when encoded as an
HTTP POST parameter.
This is hopefully sufficient to fix the CI failures we've seen with
the tests for POST /api/v1/fetch_api_key; I haven't reproduced the
failure so am not completely sure.
This tells users how autofix errors for linters which support it.
This is important since only way to fix prettier errors is
running lint with `--fix` which now the linter will gladly print
with the error.
Steve asked me to remove this, since the tictactoe game was always
intended as a proof of concept. Now that we have poll and todo
widgets, the sample code for tictactoe has much less value.
We replace the content and type in test_widgets.py to maintain
coverage.
Strings should be escaped at the point of interpolation into a
template, not before. In this case, the early escape was hiding the
bug that code_language was only escaped if it was not found in
pygments_data.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This reverts commit 564b199fe6, which
was part of #16308.
Escaping is either required or incorrect; it is never “defensive”.
This escaping is incorrect. lxml already escapes attributes during
serialization (any other behavior would be a serious bug), and
additional escaping just results in double escaping.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
A convenient copy-to-clipboard button was added in the Invite users to
Zulip modal, to make it slightly more convenient to share the
generated links.
The formatting is extracted to a template to make i18n and variable
substitution simpler.
Tweaked by tabbott significantly to simplify JS, HTML, and CSS.
Fixes#16442.
When compose box is open we already set
```
$(".new_message_textarea").css("min-height", "3em");
```
in compose_actions.js.
So, this property actually reduces the min-height slightly which
hides the topic when it is long enough to span in two lines.
This property never gets used and is not necessary since it
is overridden by
```
.button.small {
font-size: 1em;
padding: 3px 10px;
}
```
in compose.css
which looks good enough.
Initally, when writing two or more quotes, having
a blank line in between them, merges those quotes.
This created confusion especially in "quote and reply".
This commit fixes such issues. Now two or more quotes
having a blank line in between them, will not get merged.
This change is correct both for usability and for improving our
compatibility with CommonMark.
Fixes#14379.
Steve Howell
Anders Kaseorg
Kamal Marhubi
YashRE42
Aman Agrawal
Tim Abbott
shanukun
aniketsonu
akshatdalton
Vishnu KS