Since this decorator is only used for methods of
TestServiceBotEventTriggers, we can type the decorated method's
signature accurately without using ParamSpec.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
We can express the type of these decorators with Concatenate and ParamSpec
now for tighter type annotations.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This removes ViewFuncT and all the associated type casts with ParamSpec
and Concatenate. This provides more accurate type annotation for
decorators at the cost of making the concatenated parameters
positional-only. This change does not intend to introduce any other
behavioral difference. Note that we retype args in process_view as
List[object] because the view functions can not only be called with
arguments of type str.
Note that the first argument of rest_dispatch needs to be made
positional-only because of the presence of **kwargs.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This module was originally introduced in 2016 to assist adding mypy
annotations to the project. Back then static type checking was not that
established throughout the codebase, so it was helpful to be able to
print out the types for type checking purposes.
This workflow is no longer helpful for improving type annotations right
now, and it has been unused for a while.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Followup to commit fde9b1d366 (#22753).
(This was a misuse of “idempotent”. “Idempotent” means that
performing the request more than once in a row has the same effect as
performing it once; it says nothing about whether the response is
cacheable.)
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
It’s been unused since commit 2eacc7317d
removed the only caller of abort_all and commit
ef815e9e79 removed abort_all itself.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This was added by commit 7f174213ed, and
appears to have been designed for responses that are *successful* but
falsy. Logically, these should not implicitly represent a failure to
be retried if it were.
Note from tabbott: The background is that this idempotent retry loop
was a hacky workaround for a bug we never understood but saw daily in
production. Especially during server restarts / client reloads,
something would result in 200 responses with no data being seen by the
frontend, despite the Django server not having received/processed the
request. Fortunately, this strange failure mode appears to have
stopped happening in late 2019, so we can delete this hack.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Commit 9aa5082d63 (#20673) incorrectly
changed the name of the error callback passed to channel.get. This
prevented reporting of errors while moving a topic. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Whether we sent a resolve topic notification or not may be useful in
the caller. It was originally intended to be used in #21712, but may
only be relevant for future logging.
Part of #21712.
This will have no real effect in most situations. However, a user
moves a topic to another stream while also adding/removing the
resolved-topic checkmark from the topic name, then the "This topic was
resolved" notificaiton will now appear just before the "This topic was
moved" notification rather than just after.
This is likely slightly less confusing to users, since the topic
having been moved from somewhere else is likely the most salient fact
to a reader.
We expect to change things to not send both notifications in an
upcoming commit.
This refactoring helps with #21712.
When we detect that multiple messages are selected, copying will copy the
entirety of each message that is selected. [more conversation on that
here](https://chat.zulip.org/#narrow/stream/6-frontend/topic/triple.20click.20.2B.20copy.20paste.20bug/near/1398292).
This commit fixes a bug where we would select the entirety of a message
following a selection even when none of that last message's text was
selected (only some HTML element in the messages's container).
Fixes#18706.
A message selection that goes off the end of the last message in a topic
could still be a selection of only one message. We shouldn't assume that
it's multiple messages, and so there shouldn't be an assignment of
`skip_same_td_check = true`.
The table_name property was only ever undefined for the
special all_messages_list object.
In 6f764ce4b3, we downgraded that object
to only have a MessageListData; as a result, we now never construct a
MessageList or MessageListView without `table_name` set correctly.
`current` should ideally be `undefined` here to reflect the
correct narrow state but to make sure background updates of
message_list go smoothly, we set it to home.
Our seat count calculation is different for guest user than normal users
(a number of initial guests are free, and additional marginal guests are
worth 1/5 of a seat) - so these checks we apply when a user is being
invited or signing up need to know whether it's a guest or non-guest
being added.
This is a simple generalization of get_latest_seat_count and is useful
for calculating "what will be the realm's license count if this
number of (guest) users is added?" without duplicating any of the math
logic. Will be used in the next commits.
Our billing FAQ says:
"For an organization with N other users, 5*N guest users are included at
no extra charge. After that, you will be charged at 1/5 of your regular
per-user pricing for each additional guest.".
It wasn't quite intuitive to me that
max(non_guests, math.ceil(guests / 5)) achieves that pricing, so it's
worth mentioning in a comment that it does and that that's why that
formula is used.
This commit reuses set_delete_own_message_policy_dropdown to enable
or disable the time limit settings based on change in
delete_own_message_policy dropdown.
This is a prep commit for deduplicating code and using this same
function set_delete_own_message_policy_dropdown for disabling or
enabling the limit setting while changing policy dropdown.
For multi word stream names, searching for particular phrases, like
the entirety of any word in it, caused no space to show before and/or
after that word. For example, searching for `core` resulted in
`**core**team` (the space between `core` and `team` missing).
The cause of this bug was that the immediate container was `div` with
`display: flex` and so spaces at the ends of its immediate child
elements: text nodes and `strong` elements - were not respected. This
is fixed now by wrapping all the `description_html` text in a `span`
element (while the optional user_pill_context stays in another `span`
as before).
This is consistent with Jest and other standard test runners, and is
necessary to support asynchronous tests.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
We forgot to change the selector here when we switched from a fa globe
icon to a .zulip-icon, which resulted in the new globe icon only having
the default color.
This commit makes the appropriate change.
Because rate_limit_request_by_ip is the only caller of it, it is safe
for us to inline RateLimitedIpAddr and remove this helper. This ensures
that we have consistent internals for rate limiting functions, which all
have a should_rate_limit check.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This allows us to use them with HttpResponse objects returned by
calling a view function directly.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This change incorporate should_rate_limit into rate_limit_user and
rate_limit_request_by_ip. Note a slight behavior change to other callers
to rate_limit_request_by_ip is made as we now check if the client is
eligible to be exempted from rate limiting now, which was previously
only done as a part of zerver.lib.rate_limiter.rate_limit.
Now we mock zerver.lib.rate_limiter.RateLimitedUser instead of
zerver.decorator.rate_limit_user in
zerver.tests.test_decorators.RateLimitTestCase, because rate_limit_user
will always be called but rate limit only happens the should_rate_limit
check passes;
we can continue to mock zerver.lib.rate_limiter.rate_limit_ip, because the
decorated view functions call rate_limit_request_by_ip that calls
rate_limit_ip when the should_rate_limit check passes.
We need to mock zerver.decorator.rate_limit_user for SkipRateLimitingTest
now because rate_limit has been removed. We don't need to mock
RateLimitedUser in this case because we are only verifying that
the skip_rate_limiting flag works.
To ensure coverage in add_logging_data, a new test case is added to use
a web_public_view (which decorates the view function with
add_logging_data) with a new flag to check_rate_limit_public_or_user_views.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Aman Agrawal
Zixuan James Li
Israel Ebonko
Ganesh Pawar
Sahil Batra
Anders Kaseorg
Tim Abbott
Julia Bichler
evykassirer
Mateusz Mandera
N-Shar-ma
YashRE42