Adds non-form section to Zulip Cloud support view with some basic
realm information: organization type, plan type, non-guest user
count and guest user count.
Uses a shared template for the basic realm data and adds a shared
support context dict for variables that are used in both remote
and Zulip Cloud support views.
In the Zulip Cloud support view, adds a "Realm management" section
for support actions that are specific to that view, (e.g., changing
an organization's type or deactivating an organization).
Moves the note about emailing organization owners when a full
sponsorship is approved for Zulip Cloud Standard to the success
message for that action, which mirrors the remote server/realm
support view.
Expands section for scheduling plans in the remote support view to
have a form to create a temporary courtesy plan (aka our legacy
plan for remote servers and realms).
Form is not shown if there is a current plan for the remote billing
entity, and would raise a SupportRequestError in that case as well.
In the activity and support views, we want to see the annual
revenue for fixed price plans. While on billing pages, we do
not display this information as these plans are renegotiated
annually.
Adds get_annual_recurring_revenue_for_support_data function
to BillingSession class, so that we can get the fixed price
plan data for these views without changing the logic for
what is displayed on the billing pages.
In #23380, we are changing all occurrences of uri with url in order to
follow the latest URL standard. Previous PRs #25038 and #25045 has
replaced the occurences of uri that has no direct relation with realm.
This commit changes just the model property, which has no API
compatibility concerns.
We use `error_description` in upgrade.ts to determine if the error was
related to customer's card. Doesn't seem like there is any harm
in doing so since we are explicitly handling "stripe.CardError" and
raising these errors with "card error" description.
This also now allows user to upgrade to plus plan from pricing page.
Note that since we don't pass customer_plan on pages like self-hosting
and for/business, `Current plan` status is not displayed on these pages.
For simiplicty's sake, we can avoid trying to do cache invalidation in
the variety of events that can cause the seat count to change - since
having an up to 1 day delay between users being added and the upload
limit going up is quite reasonable.
This might not be the most meaningful change of phrasing, but .is_paid()
sounds like it's a check for whether the customer has already paid their
invoice. is_a_paid_plan() reflects better the meaning that it's whether
it's a plan of a "paid" type.
We send customer an invoice at the start of free trial, if customer
pays we upgrade them to the active plan at the end of free trial,
else we downgrade them and show a custom message on the upgrade
page regarding the current status.
Tests were broken since #29221 and #28875 didn't account for
other tests failing due to changed stripe data. Also, there
was a bug where we were not fetching the correct setup intent
and stripe session for the current test, it was fixed by narrowing
the fetch to the current customer.
Also, we now run `invoice_plans` in a `while` loop until
`next_invoice_date` is greater than the provided event_time. It
makes sense to generate all the invoices for a customer that
needs to paid by them when `invoice_plans_as_needed` is called
for a `event_time`.
Earlier, if a free plan (say legacy plan) with no next plan scheduled
was invoiced, we used to send an invoice overdue email if the last
audit log update is stale.
Actually, we don't need this data as the invoice step is just going
to downgrade the current plan. We should not wait for customer to
start uploading data in this case. Skip the email sending step and
invoice the plan to downgrade.
Adds a line to the top of the internal_billing_notice email with
the billing entity's display name.
Makes sure all internal_billng_notice email subjects also include
the billing entity's display name.
Makes small updates to the notice text for some cases.
When a customer with plan's status 'DOWNGRADE_AT_END_OF_FREE_TRIAL'
visits /billing page on the free-trial end date before the invoice
cron runs, the 'make_end_of_cycle_updates_if_needed' downgrades the
plan.
Earlier, when such a customer visited /billing page in this time window
it resulted in an assertion error.
This commit fixes the incorrect behaviour by redirecting to '/plans'
page in such cases.
No renewal ledger entry exists for a scheduled fixed-price plan.
Earlier, when a customer with scheduled fixed-price plan
visited the billing page, the 'get_next_billing_cycle' function
raised an assertion error as no renewal ledger entry exists.
We don't need the ledger entry to determine the next billing
cycle in this case, so we move the code block which determines
the last_renewal time within the else conditional i.e. where it
is needed.
The scheduled plan has NEVER_STARTED status and the
next_invoice_date set to end date of the current plan.
We use this info to determine the next billing cycle.
If the remote realm registered after the legacy plan on server
ENDED, we never migrate the plan to the remote realm. So, we need
to check the server of remote realm whenever we are check remote
realm for legacy plan.
Regardless of plan renewal schedule, we try to invoice all plans
monthly with some exceptions like free trial and fixed price plans,
which help us charge users for additional licenses used during
the previous month.
Earlier, we were using 'timezone_now' (the time cron job runs)
as the event_time while invoicing plans in 'invoice_plan'.
This is not accurate as it will lead to invoicing ledger entries
created after 'next_invoice_date' and before 'timezone_now'.
We should only invoice the ledger entries created till
next_invoice_date. It should be independent of the time
at which cron job runs.
This commit updates the logic to use next_invoice_date
as the event_time while invoicing via cron.
Earlier, the code block to calculate additional licenses charge
raised assertion error when processing a fixed-price plan.
The code block shouldn't be executed for fixed-price plans as
we don't charge customers on fixed-price plans for additional
licenses.
Lauryn Menard
Alex Vandiver
Anders Kaseorg
Aman Agrawal
Vector73
Mateusz Mandera
Prakhar Pratyush