Previosly, a pointer cursor would display when hovering over some of the
headings in the API docs, however nothing would happen when clicked.
Fixes#7702.
This commit ensures that size of each graph is the same before and
after the data is loaded. It also adds a loading indicator to each
graph until the data is loaded.
Fixes https://github.com/zulip/zulip/issues/6490
This applies the same overflow changes to “.message-info-popover” by
imposing a max width on the popover (so it doesn’t increase in width
when it gets larger) and adding the tooltip on hover.
This reverts commit 66261f1cc. See parent commit for reason; here,
provision worked but `tools/run-dev.py` would give errors.
We need to figure out a test that reproduces these issues, then make a
version of these changes that keeps that test working, before we
re-merge them.
This reverts commit 620b2cd6e.
Contributors setting up a new development environment were getting
errors like this:
```
++ dirname tools/do-destroy-rebuild-database
[...]
+ ./manage.py purge_queue --all
Traceback (most recent call last):
[...]
File "/home/zulipdev/zulip/zproject/legacy_urls.py", line 3, in <module>
import zerver.views.streams
File "/home/zulipdev/zulip/zerver/views/streams.py", line 187, in <module>
method_kwarg_pairs: List[FuncKwargPair]) -> HttpResponse:
File "/usr/lib/python3.5/typing.py", line 1025, in __getitem__
tvars = _type_vars(params)
[...]
File "/usr/lib/python3.5/typing.py", line 277, in _get_type_vars
for t in types:
TypeError: 'ellipsis' object is not iterable
```
The issue appears to be that we're using the `typing` module from the
3.5 stdlib, rather than the `typing=3.6.2` in our requirements files,
and that doesn't understand the `Callable[..., HttpResponse]` that
appears in the definition of `FuncKwargPair`.
Revert for now to get provision working again; at least one person
reports that reverting this sufficed. We'll need to do more testing
before putting this change back in.
This reverts commit 5a1869901. I reviewed this change and decided not
to merge it yet, but then I did anyway <_< >_>, along with some others
in the same PR.
This line was added in e8ab7cd1a as a desperate measure to get the
`set_loglevel` helper to successfully suppress the `zulip.send_email`
logs.
In fact, the reason that just setting `level` there wasn't doing the
job had nothing to do with `propagate`, which doesn't interact with
`level`. (See the long block comment in `zproject/settings.py`,
searching for "Python logging module", for my attempt at concisely
explaining these semantics.) Rather, our setting for `level` was
getting clobbered by the use of `create_logger`; and setting
`propagate` to False worked by completely suppressing all logs to
`zulip.send_email` and descendants from reaching the normal handlers,
regardless of the log messages' levels.
Now that the `create_logger` issue is fixed (see a few commits before
this one), drop that.
The name `create_logger` suggests something much bigger than what this
function actually does -- the logger doesn't any more or less exist
after the function is called than before. Its one real function is to
send logs to a specific file.
So, pull out that logic to an appropriately-named function just for
it. We already use `logging.getLogger` in a number of places to
simply get a logger by name, and the old `create_logger` callsites can
do the same.
From the docs:
> This function does nothing if the root logger already has handlers
> configured for it.
Which we do if we've started up Django and configured settings, and in
particular allowed Django to process `settings.LOGGING`.
So, cut it out -- all it can do is confuse people about how logging
works.
If we ever actually used the `log_format` parameter, this would be
doubly confused, because only the first call would have any effect.
cPhost
Tommy Ip
Alena Volkova
neiljp (Neil Pilgrim)
itstakenalr
Shreyansh Dwivedi
Rishi Gupta
Sivagiri
Brock Whittaker
Xavier Cooney
Andy Perez
YJDave
Steve Howell
Umair Khan
pradeepgangwar
Vishnu Ks
Utkarsh Patil
Aastha Gupta
Balaji2198
civilnewsnetwork
Greg Price
rht