This switches us to use the correct timestamp, service_id and token
formats. The 'service_id' should be the ID of the bot user. The token
should be a sample token generated from 'random_api_key()'.
The information here was recently added to manage-who-can-join-and-invite.
Arguably this is one we should save, since it is a distinctive feature not
offered by all of our competitors, and it gets some additional visibility by
being in the left sidebar. The model of having multiple things in the
sidebar pointing to the same article is getting messy though, and as our
feature count increases the cost of having stuff in the left sidebar is
increasing as well.
This modifies the logic for formatting outgoing missed-message emails
to support the upcoming stream email notifications feature (providing
a new format for the subject, etc.).
This is essential for using simplebar, since simplebar doesn't account
for parent <div> paddings, which might cause scrollbars to be mispositioned
if not considered.
<script charset=…>, <script type=…>, and <style type=…> are “obsolete
but conforming” in HTML5. They make the validator.nu output noisier
and real problems a little harder to find.
(type was required in HTML 4, which is not relevant to us.)
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
Otherwise validator.nu warns about the empty header tags. The
placeholder text is replaced by JavaScript.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
It seems to have been there to paper over a styling problem that was
actually caused by slightly mismatched font sizes (em vs. rem).
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
This commit adds a Markdown tree-processor extension that renders
multi-line code blocks that are nested inside lists with the
formatting. Note that the code block could be nested inside multiple
list levels and would still get rendered correctly.
Tim: This fixes the need for unpleasant workarounds like
f5bfa4e793 and makes nested code blocks
in our documentation look exactly how users would expect them to.
This commit carves out the overview for incoming webhooks and
moves it to its own file. This is a much better way to structure
these docs.
This is a quick follow-up to Tim Abbott's comment on #9592.
These must refer to the id of an existing form control; id_username
doesn’t exist and streams_to_add isn’t a form control.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>