In 93914d8cd8, we intended to change our
markdown processor to add support for multi-line /me messages.
However, we neglected to change the backend processor, resulting in
the change only taking effect for the user sending the message :(.
We fix this by changing the backend processor too.
Fixes#12450.
We reuse the link regexes we use elsewhere inn markdown
for parsing links in topic names and add a button to open
them in new tabs similar to our behavior with linkifiers
in topic names.
Fixes#12391.
The VNU_IGNORE whitelist lets in some crazy-invalid preexisting HTML,
but hopefully this will stop the problem from getting much larger.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
Pasting a generated password into the password box triggers neither a
change event (until the password box is unfocused) nor a keyup event.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
It appears not to have been useful and makes it marginally harder to
reason about how module resolution works. Paths to static content in
node_modules should be resolved through Webpack instead.
(This node_modules symlink was originally created in the pre-webpack world
where all of our static asset paths were based in static/.)
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
Modified heavily by punchagan to correctly handle narrowing to huddles, and
for `group-pm-with` narrows. Also, fixed broken tests in the original PR.
Closes#5876
Right now we have buttons for "New conversation" and "New private message"
in different views, but both buttons do the same thing.
The current state is confusing for new users, since there is already a lot
of terminology one needs to learn in order to understand the Zulip
conversation model. It's very plausible a user would think a "conversation"
is something different from a "private message" or a "topic".
The UI does not allow you to send a message to a stream you're not
subscribed to, even if the API does.
And since it's clear any member of the organization can join and then send,
there's no real harm in giving the simpler explanation.
When archiving Messages, we stop relying on LEFT JOIN ... IS NULL to
avoid duplicates when INSERTing. Instead we use ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE
(added in postgresql 9.5) to, in case of archiving a Message that
already has a corresponding archived objects (this happens if a Message
gets archived, restored and then archived again), re-assign the existing
ArchivedMessage to the new transaction.
This also allows us to fix test_archiving_messages_second_time, which
was temporarily disable a few commits before.
We combine run_message_batch_query and run_archiving_in_chunks
functions, which makes the code simpler and more readable - we get rid
of hacky generator usage, for example.
In the process, move_expired_messages_* functions are adjusted, and now
they archive Messages as well as their related objects.
Appropriate adjustments in reaction to this are made in the main
archiving functions which call move_expired_messages_* (they no longer
need to call move_related_objects_to_archive).
Instead of having a bunch of custom code in the function, we make it use
run_message_batch_query and run_archiving_in_chunks to do the necessary
operations in a consistent way, using the same codepaths as the rest of
the archiving system.
This breaks test_archiving_messages_second_time temporarily, but we will
fix it and re-enable the test in the next commits, where we'll address
various other issues with re-archiving of messages.
We also remove the @transaction.atomic wrapper, because atomicity is
handled by the logic inside run_archiving_in_chunks.
We add a new model, ArchiveTransaction, to tie archived objects together
in a coherent way, according to the batches in which they are archived.
This enables making a better system for restoring from archive, and it
seems just more sensible to tie the archived objects in this way, rather
the somewhat vague setting of archive_timestamp to each object using
timezone_now().
Since we no longer support Ubuntu Trusty, we no longer need this
backwards-compatibility cruft (which we only kept around to avoid
randomizing configuration for existing systems).
This was only used in Ubuntu 14.04 Trusty.
Removing this also finally lets us simplify our security model
discussion of uploaded files.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
Soumya Himanish Mohapatra
Vishnu Ks
Rohitt Vashishtha
Anders Kaseorg
Aman Agrawal
Anders Kaseorg
Tim Abbott
Puneeth Chaganti
SatyendraBanjare
Rishi Gupta
Rishi Gupta
Mateusz Mandera