Apparently + is just how you used to encode spaces in aim:
urls in 1999, not in mailto: links.
(imported from commit 156708378e6b1d6955063a0979c8bee9d5b0e849)
When we added rabbitmq usage within Tornado, we inadvertently caused
the Tornado ioloop to be initialized in runtornado.py's imports,
before we overwrote the _poll method. The end result was that we
weren't running the our instrumented Tornado poll function.
Fix this by moving that code to its own file which we import at the
top of runtornado.py, and adding comments documenting the situation so
we don't break this in some future import reorganization.
(imported from commit 016717476f10566fef4ed2b656f29f865d2084db)
We also switch the Python client to use a client string of "API: Python"
to allow us to determine more easily which bindings our users are using.
(imported from commit 7216c3d150b371835f14d1bc8d81979a92e44925)
Previously user_profile was a kwarg, which was inconsistent with all other
_backend functions.
(imported from commit 6b857bcb2c3c978079af2f6edd367c1804d51988)
This is to allow flexibility in functions that we think should be callable
via either GET or POST.
As part of this, POSTRequestMock was extended to populate the REQUEST
dict.
(imported from commit b9d32d2b65ff8a25885452992cf7dd37b9664246)
This includes a process_patch_as_post decorator which enables this view
to be invoked as a PATCH on an object.
Hopefully this decorator can go away once POST values are correctly parsed
in Django for PATCH verb invocations.
(imported from commit 6cf9d69cfb9dea5354ea37408566146757b5be54)
This slightly reduces code duplication and in the future the {api,json}_ methods
will hopefully go away, leaving only the _backend methods.
(imported from commit 82a6e4a2ff2ba5d272068e9ff043ea47a1a8d278)
Instead we now rely on the request._client value, which we were previously
passing along to s_m_b in all but one case.
For that one case, we just modify the Request object to include the value
beforehand.
(imported from commit 542f38f94bc447149cd4d2efaa5e8f48f756725b)
Addresses a complaint brought up in our usability study.
We now hook into the "show" event on .subscription_settings elements and
do some obnoxious math to move the scrollbar the way we want.
Closes trac #1015.
(imported from commit 5d9cee1ffc242eb7b743fdccd2bd76bf0a7ba060)
This can result in a significant performance benefit because we only
need to update the columns that changed..
(imported from commit 42bef1fcc58ad79bd864f89263fe82e90743ee5b)
The policy this implements is:
* 1 week for most persistent data (Clients, etc.)
* 1 day for messages
(imported from commit d57bb2c6b9626ffa2155c6d0ef9b60827d1f2381)
This saves 2 database queries per user in the huddle when sending the
first message to a particular huddle.
(imported from commit f71aa32df846fb4b82651a93ff9608087ffcaa5a)
Apparently, something in Django 1.5's changes to their default logging
setup resulted in the logger 500 errors (logged in
django.core.handlers.base.handle_uncaught_exception) from reaching the
root logger -- they stopped at propagating at the 'django' logger. We
deal with this by making our logging system handle those events in the
'django' logger ourselves (and making the related changes needed to
ensure that we still log to server.log and the console everything
logged by our own humbug.requests logger and anything that falls
through to the root logger).
This requires updating the mechanism we use in test_settings.py to
silence our request logging, since now the 'humbug.requests' logger is
being re-initialized by the Django logging setup, which runs after
test_settings.py.
While we're at it, set propagate=False in the commented-out
'django.db' logging configuration (previously, queries would be logged
twice).
(imported from commit 32af29084e52be1ba6f92a7952c3a3946925b46b)
This is in addition to only successfully reporting a given error once
per session. Previously, if an error was triggered many times before
the ajax call to report the error returned, we'd end up making many
ajax requests to report the error.
(imported from commit 559179e3c8c3fbf03bbb091a67361d447c80b7bb)
Because we're storing 25,000+ message content objects in memcached on
server restart, we were sometimes exceeding the 64MB cap even during
the restart process. 256MB should be safely large enough to not have
the issue but not so large as to seriously consume resources on our
app frontends (which currently have 7GB of RAM).
(imported from commit 1a64319e50c9dadf0bc65e2e4dbf08f4cc1b9c38)