ES and TypeScript modules are strict by default and don’t need this
directive. ESLint will remind us to add it to new CommonJS files and
remove it from ES and TypeScript modules.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Prettier would do this anyway, but it’s separated out for a more
reviewable diff. Generated by ESLint.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Prettier would do this anyway, but it’s separated out for a more
reviewable diff. Generated by ESLint.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This commit changes stream_data.is_user_subscribed to use stream id
instead of stream name.
We are using stream ids so that we can avoid bugs related to live
update after stream rename.
This commit changes would_receive_message and want_normal_display
functions in compose_fade.js to use stream id, instead of stream
name, to get sub object. We are using stream ids so that we can
avoid bugs related to live update after stream rename.
We are trying to phase out the trigger-event way
of telling modules to do something.
In this case we not only remove the indirection
of the event handler, but we also get to remove
`compose_fade` from the `ui_init` startup sequence.
This also has us update `compose_fade` outside
the loop, although that's only a theoretical
improvement, since I don't think `peer_add` events
every actually include multiple streams.
To make the dispatch tests a little flatter, I
added a one-line change to zjsunit to add
`make_stub` to `global`.
To manually test:
* have Aaron reply to Denmark (keep compose box open)
* have Iago add Hamlet to Denmark
* have Hamlet unsubscribe
This commit changes the would_receive_message to use user_id
instead of emails.
This change is done because user_ids are immutable and using
user_ids is the correct way of uniquely identifying user.
The change in 'would_receive_message' also leads to change
in util.is_pm_recipient to use a string of user_ids instead
of emails.
We also know that user_ids passed to 'would_receive_message'
are active user_ids, since we get them from buddy_list.
So we don't need to check whether the user is active, which
was previously being checked by get_active_user_for_email.
We now treat util like a leaf module and
use "require" to import it everywhere it's used.
An earlier version of this commit moved
util into our "shared" library, but we
decided to wait on that. Once we're ready
to do that, we should only need to do a
simple search/replace on various
require/zrequire statements plus a small
tweak to one of the custom linter checks.
It turns out we don't really need util.js
for our most immediate code-sharing goal,
which is to reuse our markdown code on
mobile. There's a little bit of cleanup
still remaining to break the dependency,
but it's minor.
The util module still calls the global
blueslip module in one place, but that
code is about to be removed in the next
few commits.
I am pretty confident that once we start
sharing things like the typeahead code
more aggressively, we'll start having
dependencies on util. The module is barely
more than 300 lines long, so we'll probably
just move the whole thing into shared
rather than break it apart. Also, we
can continue to nibble away at the
cruftier parts of the module.
Rather than defining two different jquery event-handlers for two different
events, we can use a single jquery handler as the function is the same for
both handlers.
The compose_state.recipient field was only actually the recipient for
the message if it was a private_message_recipient (in the sense of
other code); we store the stream in compose_state.stream instead.
As a result, the name was quite confusing, resulting in the
possibility of problematic correctness bugs where code assumes this
field has a valid value for stream messages. Fix this by changing it
to compose_state.private_message_recipient for clarity.
This commit was originally automatically generated using `tools/lint
--only=eslint --fix`. It was then modified by tabbott to contain only
changes to a set of files that are unlikely to result in significant
merge conflicts with any open pull request, excluding about 20 files.
His plan is to merge the remaining changes with more precise care,
potentially involving merging parts of conflicting pull requests
before running the `eslint --fix` operation.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
With webpack, variables declared in each file are already file-local
(Global variables need to be explicitly exported), so these IIFEs are
no longer needed.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
The stream/topic edit areas now have these ids:
#stream_message_recipient_stream
#stream_message_recipient_topic
They are pretty verbose, but being able to grep
for these without noise does have some value.
This commit prepares the frontend code to be consumed by webpack.
It is a hack: In theory, modules should be declaring and importing the
modules they depend on and the globals they expose directly.
However, that requires significant per-module work, which we don't
really want to block moving our toolchain to webpack on.
So we expose the modules by setting window.varName = varName; as
needed in the js files.
This is preparation for enabling an eslint indentation configuration.
90% of these changes are just fixes for indentation errors that have
snuck into the codebase over the years; the others are more
significant reformatting to make eslint happy (that are not otherwise
actually improvements).
The one area that we do not attempt to work on here is the
"switch/case" indentation.
Instead of treating false differently from undefined, our
function is now a regular boolean function, and we limit our
code comments to the one corner case where the true/false
decision is kind of arbitrary and possibly confusing.
The buddy list never includes yourself nor bots, so we
remove the special case handling for those situations.
If we were to put bots or the current user back in the list,
I'm not convinced the old logic was what we'd want in either
case going forward.
For example, we might want to fade bots that aren't subscribed
to public streams, since they might otherwise confuse people,
but then again they would receive messages. And then "yourself"
is a recipient in the technical sense but they're kinda
not and either way it doesn't provide much signal either way.
When we populate the buddy list or update it for activity, we now
have buddy_data set a faded flag that is rendered in the template.
This avoids some re-rendering overhead and is on the eventual path
to having our widget be more data-oriented (and all rendering happens
"behind" the widget).
We still do direct DOM updates when the compose state changes or
when we get peer subscription events.
Also adds a custom rule to eslint. Since the recommended way of extending
eslint is to create plugins as standalone npm packages, the separate rule
is published as 'eslint-plugins-empty-returns'.
Fixes#8669.
We now correctly pass the list item for a user to the function
compose_fade.update_one_row().
This regression started happening in the recent commit of
eece725073. Before that commit,
compose-fade was broken in a different way.
Testing this fix requires creating a stream and opening the compose
box in one window. Then, in the other window, have a user not
subscribed to the stream log on for the first time. Be careful
to make sure you flip back to the other browser tab quickly, and
you should see the new user grayed out. (You can get a false
positive if you wait too long, because the periodic update was
correctly fading before this fix.)
Our JS/CSS now only uses the user-fade class for elements
that have the user-sidebar-entry class. This should prevent
bugs related to having doubly opaque elements.
We now have specific HTML/CSS classes for message fading and
user fading. They currently both have the same effect, changing
opacity, but we can now more easily treat them differently.
This change also removes "faded" attributes in compose-fade,
which avoids some confusion related to landing pages having
a "faded" class as well.
This fixes the mobile web experience for Chrome on iOS.
Apparently, Chrome-on-iOS silently has a `viewport` module that
overrides and user-defined module by that name, causing all of our
code that accesses the viewport module to not work on that platform.
We fix this by renaming it.
Anders Kaseorg
Priyank Patel
sahil839
Steve Howell
Steve Howell
Anders Kaseorg
Pragati Agrawal
Tim Abbott
YashRE42
Armaan Ahluwalia
YJDave
Shubham Dhama
Rohitt Vashishtha
Steve Howell