"help" command occurs in the command list in
initial pms or when bot doesn't understand the message. It doesn't
occur when the bot is respoding to the "help" command itself.
1. The initial welcome message now contains less detail.
2. The bot now responds to these commands: "apps", "edit profile",
"dark mode", "light mode", "streams", "topics", "message formatting",
"keyboard shortcuts" and "help" - the bot still responds if there are
slight variations in these commands.
3. Tests have been made to check if bot responds to the advertised
commands (with variations) and gives a negative message if it doesn't
understand the message.
With substantial tweaks by tabbott.
Fixes#19900.
This better matches the title of the page and more generally our
conventions around naming /help/ articles. We include a redirect
because this is referenced from Welcome Bot messages, and we
definitely don't want those links to break.
django.utils.translation.ugettext is a deprecated alias of
django.utils.translation.gettext as of Django 3.0, and will be removed
in Django 4.0.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
We change the return type of check_message to be dataclass instead of
Dict[str, Any]. This refactoring helps us to understand the context of the
data structure returned by check_message clearly which was not possible
when using Dict.
SendMessageRequest class is added in zerver/lib/message.py inspite of it
not being used in that file itself just to maintain consistency as other
TypedDicts and dataclasses are defined in that file and to avoid circular
dependency as SendMessageRequest is being used in lib/widget.py as well.
We also rename local variable to 'send_request' for accessing
SendMessageRequest objects.
Fixes#2665.
Regenerated by tabbott with `lint --fix` after a rebase and change in
parameters.
Note from tabbott: In a few cases, this converts technical debt in the
form of unsorted imports into different technical debt in the form of
our largest files having very long, ugly import sequences at the
start. I expect this change will increase pressure for us to split
those files, which isn't a bad thing.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Automatically generated by the following script, based on the output
of lint with flake8-comma:
import re
import sys
last_filename = None
last_row = None
lines = []
for msg in sys.stdin:
m = re.match(
r"\x1b\[35mflake8 \|\x1b\[0m \x1b\[1;31m(.+):(\d+):(\d+): (\w+)", msg
)
if m:
filename, row_str, col_str, err = m.groups()
row, col = int(row_str), int(col_str)
if filename == last_filename:
assert last_row != row
else:
if last_filename is not None:
with open(last_filename, "w") as f:
f.writelines(lines)
with open(filename) as f:
lines = f.readlines()
last_filename = filename
last_row = row
line = lines[row - 1]
if err in ["C812", "C815"]:
lines[row - 1] = line[: col - 1] + "," + line[col - 1 :]
elif err in ["C819"]:
assert line[col - 2] == ","
lines[row - 1] = line[: col - 2] + line[col - 1 :].lstrip(" ")
if last_filename is not None:
with open(last_filename, "w") as f:
f.writelines(lines)
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
Previous cleanups (mostly the removals of Python __future__ imports)
were done in a way that introduced leading newlines. Delete leading
newlines from all files, except static/assets/zulip-emoji/NOTICE,
which is a verbatim copy of the Apache 2.0 license.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
The hope is that by having a shorter list of initial streams, it'll
avoid some potential confusion confusion about the value of topics.
At the very least, having 5 streams each with 1 topic was not a good
way to introduce Zulip.
This commit minimizes changes to the message content in
`send_initial_realm_messages` to keep the diff readable. Future commits will
reshape the content.
For internal stream messages, most of the time, we have access to
a Stream object. For the few corner cases where we don't, it is a
much cleaner approach to have a separate function that accepts a
stream name than having one multi-option helper that accepts both
names and objects.
If the caller has access to a Stream object, it is wasteful to
query a database for a stream by ID or name. In addition, not
having to go through stream names eliminates various classes of
possible bugs involved with getting a Stream object back.
This seems like kind of a silly function to extract
to topic.py, but it will theoretically help us sweep
"subject" if we change the DB.
It had test coverage.
We extract the entire operations of the management command to a
function create_if_missing_realm_internal_bots in the
zerver/lib/onboarding.py. The logic for determining if there are any realm
internal bots which have not been created is extracted to a function
missing_any_realm_internal_bots in actions.py.
This code duplicated the code in setup_realm_internal_bots, with some
added logic to avoid trying to create the same bot twice. That logic
was buggy so that it would never work at all -- it subtracted a set of
UserProfile objects from a set of email strings -- so it looked like
the command might blow up when run after the users already existed.
In fact, the buggy logic wasn't necessary, because the work the
command does after it is idempotent -- in particular `create_users`,
within its subroutine `bulk_create_users`, already filters out users
that already exist. So just cut the buggy stuff out, deduplicate the
rest with `setup_realm_internal_bots`, and document that invariant on
the latter.
While we're here, in the common case bail early without doing any
per-realm work in Python, since we're running this on every upgrade.
Palash
Alya Abbott
Tim Abbott
Eeshan Garg
PIG208
Mateusz Mandera
Abhijeet Prasad Bodas
Anders Kaseorg
sahil839
Vishnu KS
Anders Kaseorg
Udit107710
Gloria Elston
Rishi Gupta
Eeshan Garg
Anders Kaseorg
Steve Howell
Aditya Bansal
Greg Price
rht
Harshit Bansal