It's natural that someone might try a wrong password 5 times, and then
go through a successful password reset; forcing such users to wait
half an hour before typing in the password they just changed the
account to seems unnecessarily punitive.
Clear the rate-limit upon successful password change.
Failure to pull the default "zulip" value here can lead to
accidentally applying a `postgres_password` value which is unnecessary
and may never work.
For consistency, always skip password auth attempts for the "zulip"
user on localhost, even if the password is set. This mirrors the
behavior of `process_fts_updates`.
This rewrite is intended to help new contributors do an effective
self-review of their work, with reminders of many common mistakes made
when preparing pull requests.
Removes `token_kind` parameter being passed to
`remove_apns_device_token` and `remove_android_reg_id` code
paths / endpoints. Possibly missed in a refactor of this
function as the tests for adding these tokens do not pass
a `token_kind` parameter.
Removes `zulip_org_id` and `zulip_org_kay` from code testing
`deactivate_remote_server`. These parameters are passed when
a remote server is added, so possibly a copy and paste error
when these tests were written / last refactored.
`update_realm_custom_profile_field` does not take `field_type`
as a parameter, so this removes it from any related tests.
Possibly these test parameters were missed in a refactor of this
endpoint / code.
`service_interface` is not a parameter of `add_bot_backend`, but
`interface_type` is, and that has the same default value as what
was being provided by the test, so updated for the parameter name
change, which was possibly missed in a previous code refactor.
`update_default_stream_group_info` was being passed `op` and
`group_name` in various tests, which are not implemented as
parameters for that endpoint / code path. So this removes those
from the existing tests. This is not a documented API endpoint,
so perhaps these were just overlooked when these tests were
written / last refactored.
If an API request specified a `client` parameter, we were
already prioritizing that value over parsing the UserAgent.
In order to have these parameters logged in the `RequestNotes`
as processed parameters instead of ignored parameters, we add
the `has_request_variables` decorator to `parse_client` and
then process the potential `client` parameter through the REQ
framework.
Co-authored by: Tim Abbott <tabbott@zulip.com>
We remove the StackOverflow link because it is now so dated as to be
irrelevant -- it does not use `self.ident`, and cargo-cults the return
value of PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc.
As noted in the docstring for this function, the timeout is
best-effort only -- if the thread is blocked in a syscall, it will not
service the exception until it returns. It can also choose to catch
and ignore the TimeoutExpired; in either case it will still be running
even after the `timeout()` function returns.
Raising a vare TimeoutExpired it still somewhat accurate, but obscures
that the backend thread may still be running along merrily. Notice
such cases, and log a warning about them.
Having just thrown an exception into the thread, it is often useful to
know _what_ was the slow code that we interrupted. Raising a bare
TimeoutExpired here obscures that information, as any `exc_info` will
end there.
Examine the thread for any exception information, and use that to
re-raise. This exception information is not guaranteed to exist -- if
the thread didn't respond to the exception in time, or caught it, for
instance.
The quote in question originates in python/cpython@b8b6d0c2c6, when
the code was added. However, the code stopped having that comment,
and was no longer able to return anything but 1 or 0, starting in
python/cpython@4643c2fda1 -- Python 2.5.
Remove the block.
There is no guarantee that the code passed into parse_unicode_emoji_code
is valid unicode. In the case that it is not, it might be better to
return undefined instead of throwing an exception: to represent a
non-parseable code.
For context, mobile currently returns custom emojis as emojis with
string names in their code property, instead of actual unicode.
Previously, these buttons were centered via flex, which meant that in
the rare case that a long list of private message recipients caused
the recipient area to line-wrap, these icons would be incorrectly
placed at the vertical center of the now multi-line block.
Fix this by setting an auto bottom-marging.
Fixes#21693.
Reformats two events (`reaction op: add` and `reaction op:remove`)
to follow the general format of events in the OpenAPI that are
returned by the `/get-events` endpoint.
Removes unneeded reference to `EmojiBase` schema in `user_status`
return value for the `/register-queue` endpoint. Also, clarifies
the text about the `user_status` object and fields being returned.
Change the logic for rendering PM threads in PM section to
be in the same as that of topics view --
In default view, only recent 5 PM threads would be shown
and append the active conversation as the 6th one at last
if not present in those 5.
In PM section with unreads, a maximum of 8 conversations
would be shown and rest of them would be hidden behind
the 'more conversations' li-item, clicking on which takes
to the zoomedIn view of PM section where all the present
PM threads would be visible.
Co-authored-by: Tim Abbott <tabbott@zulip.com>
This PR implements checking for a literal emoji match in emoji
typeaheads. In other words, if you paste or type panda face into an
emoji typeahead, panda face should be presented as an option to choose
from.
This behavior is currently present in the mobile app, adding it to
shared will enable both platforms to utilize this logic.
On the Debian 10 -> 11 upgrade, the server is running Zulip 4.x, which
lets us pass `--audit-fts-indexes` to `upgrade-zulip-stage-2` rather
than run the command as a separate step.
The reindex-textual-data tool needs the venv to be cable to run;
switch the order of the last two steps, making them now match the
Debian 9 -> 10 and 10 -> upgrades.
Ref #21296.
The old link here broke once we introduced separate APKs per ABI,
in zulip/zulip-mobile#5296.
We could make a direct link to app-armeabi-v7a-release.apk , the one
that's compatible with almost all devices. But perhaps better is to
just go back to linking to the release page, where the user can
choose the best APK for their device. (If they're in the habit of
downloading APKs manually to install on their device, then probably
that means they're going to be used to choosing the right one.)
User report and discussion:
https://chat.zulip.org/#narrow/stream/48-mobile/topic/Direct.20apk.20download.20link.20is.20404/near/1358758
marked.js provides a helpful error message asking for bugs to be
reported upstream, but since we're running a fork, we should redirect
such support requests to us.
We can triage as necessary.
This makes parse() more re-entrant.
This also drives out a change to the linkifiers
test, where I no longer couple the linkifiers
logic to markdown concerns. I probably should have
done this in an earlier commit, but better late
than never. I didn't bother to split out a commit
for the test stuff, since it's just tests and
the commit is still fairly atomic in nature.
e6e6010, 41ddf29 and other commits migrating components to Micromodal
have removed references to these divs. Did a global search and
removed these divs.
Adds a non-endpoint specific page to the API documentation about
organization-level roles and permissions for users in order to
highlight important and useful information for clients and API
users.
Also, adds links to new documentation page in related areas
of the API documentation.
It has always been pretty arbitrary what we did inside
of setup() vs. parse(), and we want to avoid unpredictable
results from other platforms neglecting to call setup().
On my machine you can parse a simple message in about
25 microseconds, based on a trial of a million messages
with the content of "**bold**". Whatever portion of
that time is related to setup-related things like
compiling regexes should be negligible from the user's
perspective, since we never run parse() in a loop.