In 220c2a5ff3 I
introduced a query to find invites by delivery_email
but was still using email as the key.
For most realms `email` and `delivery_email` are
synonymous, so this temporary bug would not affect
them. For realms that restrict emails, the invite
would have probably failed for other reasons, but
the symptom would have been less clear.
We now have this API...
If you really just need to log in
and not do anything with the actual
user:
self.login('hamlet')
If you're gonna use the user in the
rest of the test:
hamlet = self.example_user('hamlet')
self.login_user(hamlet)
If you are specifically testing
email/password logins (used only in 4 places):
self.login_by_email(email, password)
And for failures uses this (used twice):
self.assert_login_failure(email)
This reduces query counts in some cases, since
we no longer need to look up the user again. In
particular, it reduces some noise when we
count queries for O(N)-related tests.
The query count is usually reduced by 2 per
API call. We no longer need to look up Realm
and UserProfile. In most cases we are saving
these lookups for the whole tests, since we
usually already have the `user` objects for
other reasons. In a few places we are simply
moving where that query happens within the
test.
In some places I shorten names like `test_user`
or `user_profile` to just be `user`.
We want a clean codepath for the vast majority
of cases of using api_get/api_post, which now
uses email and which we'll soon convert to
accepting `user` as a parameter.
These apis that take two different types of
values for the same parameter make sweeps
like this kinda painful, and they're pretty
easy to avoid by extracting helpers to do
the actual common tasks. So, for example,
here I still keep a common method to
actually encode the credentials (since
the whole encode/decode business is an
annoying detail that you don't want to fix
in two places):
def encode_credentials(self, identifier: str, api_key: str) -> str:
"""
identifier: Can be an email or a remote server uuid.
"""
credentials = "%s:%s" % (identifier, api_key)
return 'Basic ' + base64.b64encode(credentials.encode('utf-8')).decode('utf-8')
But then the rest of the code has two separate
codepaths.
And for the uuid functions, we no longer have
crufty references to realm. (In fairness, realm
will also go away when we introduce users.)
For the `is_remote_server` helper, I just inlined
it, since it's now only needed in one place, and the
name didn't make total sense anyway, plus it wasn't
a super robust check. In context, it's easier
just to use a comment now to say what we're doing:
# If `role` doesn't look like an email, it might be a uuid.
if settings.ZILENCER_ENABLED and role is not None and '@' not in role:
# do stuff
Instead of trying to set the _requestor_for_logs attribute in all the
relevant places, we try to use request.user when possible (that will be
when it's a UserProfile or RemoteZulipServer as of now). In other
places, we set _requestor_for_logs to avoid manually editing the
request.user attribute, as it should mostly be left for Django to manage
it.
In places where we remove the "request._requestor_for_logs = ..." line,
it is clearly implied by the previous code (or the current surrounding
code) that request.user is of the correct type.
This uses the better, modern, user ID based API for sending messages
internally in the test suite, something that's convenient to do as a
follow-up to the migration to pass UserProfile objects to these
functions.
This commit mostly makes our tests less
noisy, since emails are no longer an important
detail of sending messages (they're not even
really used in the API).
It also sets us up to have more scrutiny
on delivery_email/email in the future
for things that actually matter. (This is
a prep commit for something along those
lines, kind of hard to explain the full
plan.)
We plan to use these records to check and record the schema of Zulip's
events for the purposes of API documentation.
Based on an original messier commit by tabbott.
In theory, a nicer version of this would be able to work directly off
the mypy type system, but this will be good enough for our use case.
This extends our email address visibility settings to deny access to
user email addresses even to organization administrators.
At the moment, they can of course change the setting (which leaves an
audit trail), but in the future only organization owners will be able
to change that setting.
While we're at this, we rewrite the settings_data.js test to cover all
the cases in a more consistent way.
Fixes#14111.
This isn't the only bug in our testing libraries with
EMAIL_ADDRESS_VISIBILITY; but we don't have a lot of tests that need
to deal with that set of settings.
We were using `code` to pass around messages.
The `code` field is designed to be a code, not
a human-readable message.
It's possible that we don't actually need two
flavors of messages for these type of validations,
but I didn't want to change that yet.
We **definitely** don't need to put two types of
message in the exception, so I fix that. Instead,
I just have the caller ask what level of detail
it needs.
I added a non-verbose message for the case of
system bots.
I removed the non-translated version of the message
for deactivated accounts, which didn't have test
coverage and is slightly more prone to leaking
email info that we don't want to leak.
In the prep commits leading up to this, we split
out two new helpers:
validate_email_is_valid
get_errors_for_new_emails
Now when we validate invites we use two separate
loops to filter our emails.
Note that the two extracted functions map to two
of the data structures that used to be handled
in a single loop, and now we break them out:
errors = validate_email_is_valid
skipped = get_errors_for_new_emails
The first loop checks that emails are even valid
to begin with.
The second loop finds out whether emails are already
in use.
The second loop takes advantage of this helper:
get_errors_for_new_emails
The second helper can query all potential new emails
with a single round trip to the database.
This reduces our query count.
The main purpose of this new function is to allow
us to validate emails in bulk, which we don't do
yet (still setting the stage for that).
This is still a speedup, though, since in our
caller we grab only three fields now.
And other than that, we're essentially doing
the same query for the single-email case, just
outside the loop.
We are trying to kill off `validate_email`, so
we no longer call it from these tests.
These tests are already kind of low-level in
nature, so testing the more specific helpers
here should be fine.
Note that we also make the third parameter
to `validate_email` non-optional in this commit,
to preserve 100% coverage. This is really just
refactoring noise--we will soon eliminate the
entire function, but I didn't want to do everything
in a huge commit.
This is a prep commit that will allow us
to more efficiently validate a bunch of
emails in the invite UI.
This commit does not yet change any
behavior or performance.
A secondary goal of this commit is to
prepare us to eliminate some hackiness
related to how we construct
`ValidationError` exceptions.
It preserves some quirks of the prior
implementation:
- the strings we decided to translate
here appear haphazard (and often
get ignored anyway)
- we use `msg` in most codepaths,
but use `code` for invites
Right now we never actually call this with
more than one email, but that will change
soon.
Note that part of the rationale for the inner
method here is to avoid a test coverage bug
with `continue` in loops.
This has two goals:
- sets up a future commit to bulk-validate
emails
- the extracted function is more simple,
since it just has errors, and no codes
or deactivated flags
This commit leaves us in a somewhat funny
intermediate state where we have
`action.validate_email` being a glorified
two-line function with strange parameters,
but subsequent commits will clean this up:
- we will eliminate validate_email
- we will move most of the guts of its
other callee to lib/email_validation.py
To be clear, the code is correct here, just
kinda in an ugly, temporarily-disorganized
intermediate state.
We now use the `get_realm_email_validator()`
helper to build an email validator outside
the loop of emails in our invite list.
This allows us to perform RealmDomain queries
only once per request, instead of once per
email.
Now called:
validate_email_not_already_in_realm
We have a separate validation function that
makes sure that the email fits into a realm's
domain scheme, and we want to avoid naming
confusion here.
Without the fix here, you will get an exception
similar to below if you try to invite one of the
cross realm bots. (The actual exception is
a bit different due to some rebasing on my branch.)
File "/home/zulipdev/zulip/zerver/lib/request.py", line 368, in _wrapped_view_func
return view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
File "/home/zulipdev/zulip/zerver/views/invite.py", line 49, in invite_users_backend
do_invite_users(user_profile, invitee_emails, streams, invite_as)
File "/home/zulipdev/zulip/zerver/lib/actions.py", line 5153, in do_invite_users
email_error, email_skipped, deactivated = validate_email(user_profile, email)
File "/home/zulipdev/zulip/zerver/lib/actions.py", line 5069, in validate_email
return None, (error.code), (error.params['deactivated'])
TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
Obviously, you shouldn't try to invite a cross
realm bot to your realm, but we want a reasonable
error message.
RESOLUTION:
Populate the `code` parameter for `ValidationError`.
BACKGROUND:
Most callers to `validate_email_for_realm` simply catch
the `ValidationError` and then report a more generic error.
That's also what `do_invite_users` does, but it has the
somewhat convoluted codepath through `validate_email`
that triggers this code:
try:
validate_email_for_realm(user_profile.realm, email)
except ValidationError as error:
return None, (error.code), (error.params['deactivated'])
The way that we're using the `code` parameter for
`ValidationError` feels hacky to me. The intention
behind `code` is to provide a descriptive error to
calling code, and it's not intended for humans, and
it feels strange that we actually translate this in
other places. Here are the Django docs:
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.0/ref/forms/validation/
And then here's an example of us actually translating
a code (not part of this commit, just providing context):
raise ValidationError(_('%s already has an account') %
(email,), code = _("Already has an account."),
params={'deactivated': False})
Those codes eventually get put into InvitationError, which
inherits from JsonableError, and we do actually display
these errors in the webapp:
if skipped and len(skipped) == len(invitee_emails):
# All e-mails were skipped, so we didn't actually invite anyone.
raise InvitationError(_("We weren't able to invite anyone."),
skipped, sent_invitations=False)
I will try to untangle this somewhat in upcoming commits.
Previously, the input:
====================
- One
- Two
Two continued
====================
Would produce the same output as:
====================
- One
- Two
```
Two continued
```
====================
This was because our CodeBlockProcessor had a higher priority than
the ListIndentProcessor. This issue was discussed here:
https://chat.zulip.org/#narrow/stream/9-issues/topic/continuation.20paragraphs.20in.20list.20items.
/delete_topic endpoint could be used to request the deletion of a topic,
that would cause do_delete_messages to be called with an empty set in
these cases:
1. Requesting deletion of an empty stream.
2. Requesting deletion of a topic in a private stream with history not
public to subscribers, if the requesting admin doesn't have access to
any of the messages in that topic.
This function slims down the data that we get
from the database in order to create the
streams part of our client payload.
We also fix a typo.
We also clearly distinguish between queries
and lists here.
This new method prevents us from getting fat
objects from the database.
Instead, now we just get ids from the database
to build our subqueries.
Note that we could also technically eliminate
the `set(...)` wrappers in this code to have
Django make a subquery and save a round trip.
I am postponing that for another commit (since
it's still somewhat coupled to some other
complexity in `do_get_streams` that I am trying
to cut through, plus it's not the main point
of this commit.)
BEFORE:
# old, still in use for other codepaths
def get_stream_subscriptions_for_user(user_profile: UserProfile) -> QuerySet:
# TODO: Change return type to QuerySet[Subscription]
return Subscription.objects.filter(
user_profile=user_profile,
recipient__type=Recipient.STREAM,
)
user_subs = get_stream_subscriptions_for_user(user_profile).filter(
active=True,
).select_related('recipient')
recipient_check = Q(id__in=[sub.recipient.type_id for sub in user_subs])
AFTER:
# newly added
def get_subscribed_stream_ids_for_user(user_profile: UserProfile) -> QuerySet:
return Subscription.objects.filter(
user_profile_id=user_profile,
recipient__type=Recipient.STREAM,
active=True,
).values_list('recipient__type_id', flat=True)
subscribed_stream_ids = get_subscribed_stream_ids_for_user(user_profile)
recipient_check = Q(id__in=set(subscribed_stream_ids))
We calculate `max_message_id` for the mobile client.
Our query now no longer joins to the Message table
and just grabs one value instead of fat objects.
For historical reasons we were creating Recipient
objects at some point in the typing-notifications
codepath. Now we just work with UserProfiles.
This removes some queries, as indicated by
the change to `len(queries)` in a couple of the
tests.
The one subtle thing that changes here is huddles.
If user 10 sends a typing notification that they
are talking to users 20 and 30, there might not
actually be a huddle for users 10/20/30, but
we were actually creating huddles on the fly!
There is no need to create huddles just for
typing notifications, since we don't even
share huddle ids with our clients. The clients
just infer the huddles.
Some of the code that gets killed off here as
somewhat "collateral damage" is some
defensive code related to formerly supporting streams
in typing indicators. The support for streams
was killed off almost as soon as we released
the feature, and the codepath is pretty clearly
user-centric at this point.
I actually like this pattern:
def check_send_typing_notification(...):
typing_notification = check_typing_notification(...)
do_send_typing_notification(...)
It can help divide responsibilities nicely and make it easy
to write detailed unit tests against each of the two helpers.
Unfortunately, the good things didn't really happen here, and
instead we got the worst aspects of the pattern:
- The responsibilities for validation leaked into
the second function.
- Both functions were doing sane things individually
that became not-so-sane in the big picture (namely,
we ended up making Recipient objects for no reason,
but if you read each of the helpers, it was just one
step that seemed reasonable).
- Passing around dictionaries for results can be annoying.
Also, the pattern made a lot more sense when the validation
for typing was a lot more complicated. My prior commit makes
it so that we only ever deal with a list of user_ids.
Anyway, now I'm inlining it. :)
Subsequent commits will clean up the more substantive issue
here, which is that we are building Recipients for no reason.
Before the Django 2.x upgrade, the DatabaseCreation
argument took an integer value. To deal with running
mulitple test instances, we created a random start
range that could count up 100 workers until the next
random id. Arbitrarily limiting the number of workers
to 100.
Post upgrade, we can now use string values. Enabling
the database + worker numbers to be more readable, as
well as removing the cap on the worker count.
This field wasn't accessed by any clients and was a less robust
version of the user_id field. Any client hoping to be interested in
who did message edits should be able to handle working with user IDs
rather than email addresses.
This is preparation for supporting moving messages between streams in
some cases.
It doesn't actually have any functional effect, since flush_message
clears the message unconditionally anyway.
This is mostly refactoring, but we also prevent a new
type of value error (list of non-int-or-string). The
new test code helps enforce that.
Cleanup includes:
- Use early-exit for email case.
- Rename helpers to get_validate_*.
- Avoid clumsy rebuilding of lists in helpers.
- Avoid the confusing `recipient` name (which
can be confused with the model by the same
name).
- Just delegate duplicate-id/email-removal to
the helpers.
The cleaner structure allows us to elminate a couple
mypy workarounds.
Credits to @xpac1985 for reporting, debugging and proposing fix to the
issue. The proposed fix was modified slightly by @hackerkid to set the
correct value for max_invites and upload_quota_gb. Tests added by
@hackerkid.
Fixes#13974
This fixes a confusing aspect of how our automated tests worked
previously, where we'd almost all HTTP requests in the unlikely
configuration with no User-Agent string specified.
We need to adjust query counts in a few tests that now are a bit
cheaper because they now can take advantage of a Client object created
in server_initialization.py in `process_client`.
To avoid some hidden bugs in tests caused by every ldap user having the
same password, we give each user a different password, generated based
on their uids (to avoid some ugly hard-coding in a bunch of places).
‘req_var in request.GET’ was previously believed to be slow from
profiling results. However, the real explanation for those profiling
results is that WSGIRequest.GET is a lazy cached property, so there’s
no reason to avoid it if we’re accessing request.GET anyway.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
In https://github.com/zulip/zulip/pull/12823 some changes to the realms
structure have been made, so now both in production and development
cross-realm bots live in the realm with string_id "zulipinternal".
There was a TODO in retention code to eliminate a conditional in a query
that became redundant with this change, and also the zulipinternal realm
should be omitted from the archiving process in archive_messages().
We use this single regular expression for processing essentially every
request, so it's definitely worth hinting to Python that we're going
to do so by compiling it. Saves about 40us per request.
A sloppy implementation of the main has_request_variables wrapper
function meant that it did two very inefficient things:
* To combine together the GET and POST parameters, it would make a
copy of the request.GET QueryDict object, which combined with the
fact that these objects are slow to access, consumed about 90us per
argument.
* Doing this in a loop (one time per argument), rather than once,
which resulted in us doing this 11 times for a `GET /events` query.
Fixing this to just make a dictionary and combine things with some
small loops saved about 1 millisecond from the total runtime of GET
/events (for comparison, the total actual work of that view function
is about 700ms).
We need to fix at least one test that used a bad mock HttpRequest
object that didn't have a .GET property.
The comment explains this issue, but effectively, the upgrade to
Django 2.x means that Django's built-in django.request logger was
writing to our errors logs WARNING-level data for every 404 and 400
error. We don't consider user errors to be a problem worth
highlighting in that log file.
Django 2.2.x is the next LTS release after Django 1.11.x; I expect
we'll be on it for a while, as Django 3.x won't have an LTS release
series out for a while.
Because of upstream API changes in Django, this commit includes
several changes beyond requirements and:
* urls: django.urls.resolvers.RegexURLPattern has been replaced by
django.urls.resolvers.URLPattern; affects OpenAPI code and related
features which re-parse Django's internals.
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/28593
* test_runner: Change number to suffix. Django changed the name in this
ticket: https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/28578
* Delete now-unnecessary SameSite cookie code (it's now the default).
* forms: urlsafe_base64_encode returns string in Django 2.2.
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/2.2/ref/utils/#django.utils.http.urlsafe_base64_encode
* upload: Django's File.size property replaces _get_size().
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/2.2/_modules/django/core/files/base/
* process_queue: Migrate to new autoreload API.
* test_messages: Add an extra query caused by .refresh_from_db() losing
the .select_related() on the Realm object.
* session: Sync SessionHostDomainMiddleware with Django 2.2.
There's a lot more we can do to take advantage of the new release;
this is tracked in #11341.
Many changes by Tim Abbott, Umair Waheed, and Mateusz Mandera squashed
are squashed into this commit.
Fixes#10835.
Since essentially the first use of Tornado in Zulip, we've been
maintaining our Tornado+Django system, AsyncDjangoHandler, with
several hundred lines of Django code copied into it.
The goal for that code was simple: We wanted a way to use our Django
middleware (for code sharing reasons) inside a Tornado process (since
we wanted to use Tornado for our async events system).
As part of the Django 2.2.x upgrade, I looked at upgrading this
implementation to be based off modern Django, and it's definitely
possible to do that:
* Continue forking load_middleware to save response middleware.
* Continue manually running the Django response middleware.
* Continue working out a hack involving copying all of _get_response
to change a couple lines allowing us our Tornado code to not
actually return the Django HttpResponse so we can long-poll. The
previous hack of returning None stopped being viable with the Django 2.2
MiddlewareMixin.__call__ implementation.
But I decided to take this opportunity to look at trying to avoid
copying material Django code, and there is a way to do it:
* Replace RespondAsynchronously with a response.asynchronous attribute
on the HttpResponse; this allows Django to run its normal plumbing
happily in a way that should be stable over time, and then we
proceed to discard the response inside the Tornado `get()` method to
implement long-polling. (Better yet might be raising an
exception?). This lets us eliminate maintaining a patched copy of
_get_response.
* Removing the @asynchronous decorator, which didn't add anything now
that we only have one API endpoint backend (with two frontend call
points) that could call into this. Combined with the last bullet,
this lets us remove a significant hack from our
never_cache_responses function.
* Calling the normal Django `get_response` method from zulip_finish
after creating a duplicate request to process, rather than writing
totally custom code to do that. This lets us eliminate maintaining
a patched copy of Django's load_middleware.
* Adding detailed comments explaining how this is supposed to work,
what problems we encounter, and how we solve various problems, which
is critical to being able to modify this code in the future.
A key advantage of these changes is that the exact same code should
work on Django 1.11, Django 2.2, and Django 3.x, because we're no
longer copying large blocks of core Django code and thus should be
much less vulnerable to refactors.
There may be a modest performance downside, in that we now run both
request and response middleware twice when longpolling (once for the
request we discard). We may be able to avoid the expensive part of
it, Zulip's own request/response middleware, with a bit of additional
custom code to save work for requests where we're planning to discard
the response. Profiling will be important to understanding what's
worth doing here.
1) Created a new class `DatabaseType` and access its objects inside
`template_database_status()` instead of sending five arguments with
default values.
2) Made `check_files` and `setting_name` local variables instead of
function parameters since they had same value(None) for every call.
Fixes#13845.
webpack optimizes JSON modules using JSON.parse("{…}"), which is
faster than the normal JavaScript parser.
Update the backend to use emoji_codes.json too instead of the three
separate JSON files.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
This code was very useful when first implemented to help catch errors
where our backend templates didn't render, but has been superceded by
the success of our URL coverage testing (which ensures every URL
supported by Zulip's urls.py is accessed by our tests, with a few
exceptions) and other tests covering all of the emails Zulip sends.
It has a significant maintenance cost because it's a bit hacky and
involves generating fake context, so it makes sense to remove these.
Any future coverage issues with templates should be addressed with a
direct test that just accessing the relevant URL or sends the relevant
email.
We now use realm_id for querying UserPresence
instead of building a big WHERE clause from the
list of user_ids.
This commit may be a bit hard to measure, since
we still get the list of user_ids for the PushToken
query in the same method.
We now validate streams with a separate
function from PM recipients.
It's confusing enough all the ways you can
encode a stream or encode the PM recipients,
but trying to do it all in one function was
hard to reason about and led to at least one
bug.
In particular, there was a bug where streams
with commas in them would get split. Now
we just don't ever split on commas inside
of `extract_stream_indicator`.
Fixes#13836
After removing internal_send_message() in a recent
commit, we now have only two callers for
extract_recipients, and they are both related
to our REQ mechanism that always passes strings
to converters. (If there are default values,
REQ does not call the converters.)
We therefore make two changes:
- use the more strict annotation of "str"
for the `s` parameter
- don't bother with the isinstance check
This index is intended to optimize the performance of the very
frequently run query of "what is the presence status of all users in a
realm?".
Main changes:
- add realm_id to UserPresence
- add index for realm_id
- backfill realm_id for old rows
- change all writes to UserPresence to include
realm_id
The index is of this form:
"zerver_userpresence_realm_id_5c4ef5a9" btree (realm_id)
We will create an index on (realm_id, timestamp) in a
future commit, but I think it's a bit faster if you do
the backfill before the index.
There's also a minor tweak to the populate_db script.
This is just a refactoring to the more modern API
for sending internal messages.
To make this work we now plumb the email_gateway
flag through `internal_send_stream_message` instead
of `internal_send_message`.
We also change `send_zulip` to have its callers
pass in a full UserProfile object (which one of
them already had).
We prefer this to internal_send_message().
We are trying to deprecate `internal_send_message`,
which has extra moving parts related to
`extract_recipients` and `Addressee.legacy_build`.
There are two chunks of code that I touch here
that look pretty similar, but I'm not quite
sure they're worth de-duplicating, since they
use different topics and different message
content.
Instead of having `notify_new_user` delegate
all the heavy lifting to `send_signup_message`,
we just rename `send_signup_message` to be
`notify_new_user` and remove the one-line
wrapper.
We remove a lot of obsolete complexity:
- `internal` was no longer ever set to True
by real code, so we kill it off as well
as well as killing off the internal_blurb code
and the now-obsolete test
- the `sender` parameter was actually an
email, not a UserProfile, but I think
that got past mypy due to the caller
passing in something from settings.py
- we were only passing in NOTIFICATION_BOT
for the sender, so we just hard code
that now
- we eliminate the verbose
`admin_realm_signup_notifications_stream`
parameter and just hard code it to
"signups"
- we weren't using the optional realm
parameter
There's also a long ugly comment in
`get_recipient_info` related to this code
that I amended for now.
We should try to take action in a subsequent
commit.
This avoids an unnecessary join to UserProfile.
To verify this, you can do `print(queries)` in the
`test_get_custom_profile_fields_from_api` test. It's
kinda noisy, so I excerpted them below...
Before:
SELECT ...
FROM "zerver_customprofilefieldvalue"
INNER JOIN "zerver_userprofile" ON ("zerver_customprofilefieldvalue"."user_profile_id" = "zerver_userprofile"."id")
INNER JOIN "zerver_customprofilefield" ON ("zerver_customprofilefieldvalue"."field_id" = "zerver_customprofilefield"."id")
WHERE "zerver_userprofile"."realm_id" = 2
After:
SELECT ...
FROM "zerver_customprofilefieldvalue"
INNER JOIN "zerver_customprofilefield" ON ("zerver_customprofilefieldvalue"."field_id" = "zerver_customprofilefield"."id")
WHERE "zerver_customprofilefield"."realm_id" = 2'
I don't have any way to measure the two queries with
realistic data, but I would assume the second
query is significantly faster on most of our instances,
since CustomProfileField should be tiny.
The line removed here is a noop, as both sides of the
immediately following conditional reassign the
same variable.
This harmless cruft was the result of the recent commit
1ae5964ab8, which added
support for single-user GETs.
Apparently, the arguments passed to template_database_status were
incorrect for the manual testing development database, in that we
didn't pass a status_dir when calling into that code from provision.
The result was that provisioning before running `test-backend` would
ignore changes to the list of check_files (etc.) made after rebasing,
and vice versa.
The cleanest fix is to compute status_dir from other values passed in;
I'm also going to open a follow-up issue for creating a better overall
interface here.
This adds a new API endpoint for querying basic data on a single other
user in the organization, reusing the existing infrastructure (and
view function!) for getting data on all users in an organization.
Fixes#12277.
This code is a bit flatter and just preps the data
for a single user. There is never any interaction
between the data for user A and user B, so we can
mostly avoid complicated nested data structures
and do most of the data-crunching on a per-user basis.
We also do an explicit sort of the data before
running it through groupby. The explicit sort
simplifies how we calculate `most_recent_info`
and also avoids needing to add `dt` to an intermediate
data structure.
Finally, when it comes to the individual client data,
the code has relied on the assumption that there is
only one row per client, which I believe to be true,
but now the code is more explicit about that.
django-phonenumber-field 2.4.0 adds tighter phone number validation
that rejects +12223334444 for having an invalid area code. This was
reverted in 4.0.0, but django-two-factor-auth still requires <3.99.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
This commit includes a new `stream_post_policy` setting,
by replacing the `is_announcement_only` field from the Stream model,
which is done by mirroring the structure of the existing
`create_stream_policy`.
It includes the necessary schema and database migrations to migrate
the is_announcement_only boolean field to stream_post_policy,
a smallPositiveInteger field similar to many other settings.
This change is done to allow organization administrators to restrict
new members from creating and posting to a stream. However, this does
not affect admins who are new members.
With many tweaks by tabbott to documentation under /help, etc.
Fixes#13616.
This flag affects page_params and the
payload you get back from POSTs to this
url:
users/me/presence
The flag does not yet affect the
presence events that get sent to a
client.
This should ensure that folks rebasing past this commit from an older
database model get their database rebuilt in the way that will
match the test_subs.py query count of 40.
We will want to raise RateLimited in authenticate() in rate limiting
code - Django's authenticate() mechanism catches PermissionDenied, which
we don't want for RateLimited. We want RateLimited to propagate to our
code that called the authenticate() function.
As more types of rate limiting of requests are added, one request may
end up having various limits applied to it - and the middleware needs to
be able to handle that. We implement that through a set_response_headers
function, which sets the X-RateLimit-* headers in a sensible way based
on all the limits that were applied to the request.
While the result of this change doesn't completely do what we need, it
does remove a huge amount of duplicated lists of fields. With a bit
more similar work, we should be able to eliminate a broad category of
potential bugs involving Stream and Subscription objects being
represented inconsistently in the API.
Work towards #13787.
This has the side of effect of making new fields we add to Stream be
automatically included, which will help maintain this code as we
upgrade it.
This commit adds is_web_public, history_public_to_subscribers, and
email_notifications fields to the dictionary.
This modifies get_cross_realm_dicts in zerver.lib.users to call
format_user_row. This is done to remove current and prevent future
inconsistencies between in the dictionary formats for get_raw_user_data
and get_cross_realm_dicts.
Implementation substantially rewritten by tabbott.
Fixes#13638.
This moves get_cross_realm_dicts (from zerver.lib.actions),
get_raw_user_data and get_custom_profile_field_values (from
zerver.lib.events) to zerver.lib.users.
This extracts the user_data inner function from get_raw_user_data as a
reusable function. We intend to reuse it for cross-realm user dicts.
A few changes were made while extracting it:
* Renaming the UserProfile argument to acting_user, so we can do loops
over a local user_profile variable.
* Moved it to zerver.lib.users, as that's a more appropriate home for
this function formatting data on users.
* Simplified the calling convention for passing custom profile fields
to reflect the fact that this function processes a single user (and
is expected to be called in a loop).
"Zulip Voyager" was a name invented during the Hack Week to open
source Zulip for what a single-system Zulip server might be called, as
a Star Trek pun on the code it was based on, "Zulip Enterprise".
At the time, we just needed a name quickly, but it was never a good
name, just a placeholder. This removes that placeholder name from
much of the codebase. A bit more work will be required to transition
the `zulip::voyager` Puppet class, as that has some migration work
involved.
A wart that has long been present inin Zulip's get_messages API is how
to request "the latest messages" in the API. Previously, the
recommendation was basically to pass anchor=10000000000000000 (for an
appropriately huge number). An accident of the server's implementation
meant that specific number of 0s was actually important to avoid a
buggy (or at least wasteful) value of found_newest=False if the query
had specified num_after=0 (since we didn't check).
This was the cause of the mobile issue
https://github.com/zulip/zulip-mobile/issues/3654.
The solution is to allow passing a special value of anchor='newest',
basically a special string-type value that the server can interpret as
meaning the user precisely just wants the most recent messages. We
also add an analogous anchor='oldest' or similar to avoid folks
needing to write a somewhat ugly anchor=0 for fetching the very first
messages.
We may want to also replace the use_first_unread_anchor argument to be
a "first_unread" value for the anchor parameter.
While it's not always ideal to make a value have a variable type like
this, in this case it seems like a really clean way to express the
idea of what the user is asking for in the API.
This is required for the upcoming type behavior of the "anchor"
parameter.
This change is the minimal work required to have our OpenAPI code not
fail when checking a union-type value of this form. We'll likely want
to, in the future, do something nicer, but it'd require more extensive
infrastructure for parsing of OpenAPI data that it's worth with our
current approach (we may want to switch to using a library).
The proximal issue here is that in upcoming commits, we're going to
change the type of the `anchor` field in `get_messages_backend` to
support passing either an integer or a string.
Many of our tests using POSTRequestMock currently define a query
object that uses integer values for the integer fields we're going to
pass into it, e.g. {'num_after': 0}. That is the correct type for
that field in the Zulip API, before HTTP encoding turns it into a
string. However, because POSTRequestMock didn't use HTTP encoding at
all (which will convert the 0 into a '0'), it ended up passing an
integer to a function that can't possible receive one as an argument.
Ideally, we'd just get rid of POSTRequestMock, since it's a hack, and
just do real HTTP requests instead.
But since it's used in a lot of places making doing so somewhat
impractical, we can get past this issue by just making POSTRequestMock
convert integers to strings.
Using logging.info() rather than logger.info() meant that our
zulip.soft_deactivation logger configuration (which, in particular,
included not logging to the console) was not active on this log line,
resulting in the `manage.py soft_deactivate_users` cron job sending
emails every time it ran.
Fixes#13750.
Previously, we didn't track opening and closing fences separately,
with led to bugs like not parsing a list that was immediately after
a quoted fence; we treated each ``` as a new fence.
This commit rewrites the function to maintain a stack of currently
open fences. If any of the parent fences is a code fence, we do not
insert a new line before a list.
We also add some test cases specifically to test this behavior with
complexly nested lists.
Fixes#13745.
Steve Howell
Mateusz Mandera
Tim Abbott
Vishnu KS
Rohitt Vashishtha
Chris Bobbe
Wyatt Hoodes
harshavardhanpb
Anders Kaseorg
Chris Heald
rht
Hashir Sarwar
akashaviator
Ryan Rehman