We no longer need or use these, since Zulip installs a pinned version
of node directly with the scripts/setup/install-node tool.
Noticed because in the effort of adding Ubuntu bionic support, we
noticed the package names changed again.
API users, particularly bots, can now send a field
called "widget_content" that will be turned into
a submessage for the web app to look at. (Other
clients can still rely on "content" to be there,
although it's up to the bot author to make the
experience good for those clients as well.)
Right now widget_content will be a JSON string that
encodes a "zform" widget with "choices." Our first
example will be a trivia bot, where users will see
something like this:
Which fruit is orange in color?
[A] orange
[B] blackberry
[C] strawberry
The letters will be turned into buttons on the webapp
and have canned replies.
This commit has a few parts:
- receive widget_content in the request (simply
validating that it's a string)
- parse the JSON in check_message and deeply
validate its structure
- turn it into a submessage in widget.py
A "zform" knows how to render data that follows our
schema for widget messages with form elements like
buttons and choices.
This code won't be triggered until a subsequent
server-side commit takes widget_content from
API callers such as the trivial chat bot and
creates submessages for us.
This starts the concept of a schema checker, similar to
zerver/lib/validator.py on the server. We can use this
to validate incoming data. Our server should filter most
of our incoming data, but it's useful to have client-side
checking to defend against things like upgrade
regressions (i.e. what if we change the name of the field
on the server side without updating all client uses).
We should probably have a try/catch in MessageListView itself
too, for post-processing kind of stuff, but we want to make
this new module defensive in its own right.
We have less urgency to test all templates now. The
most common error is probably unbalanced tags, and our
python-based template checker catches those problems
pretty well.
It's still possible to create bad templates, of course,
but the node tests have never been super deep at finding
semantic errors.
I mistakenly pushed a PR when my tests failed. I ran with
the coverage option, so I saw this brightly colored summary
report that distracted me from the failure message.
This adds a couple newlines and some all caps.
This commit adds a view which will be used to process login requests,
adds an AuthenticationTokenForm so that we can use TextField widget for
tokens, and activates two factor authentication code path whenever user
tries to login.
The only purpose of this commit is to make the django templates
of Two Factor Auth work. We probably won't need this commit once
we upgrade the admin backend of Two Factor Auth to use handlebar
templates.
This is a trial to have the first reply hotspot in the bottom
whitespace (and stick there until "Got it!" is pressed).
Tweaked by tabbott to clean it up a bit. Still needs more work on the
visuals.
Fixes#9516.
Scrollbar appeared in the subdomain input box while registering an
org. This is a hacky solution to the problem and doesn't work for
long domain names. A proper fix for the same should be provided in
the future.
The timezone environment variable was set to UTC initially. It was
changed to something other than UTC so that any local vs UTC
conversion issues will manifest in the tests.
Fixes: #5105.
This should significantly improve the user experience for creating
additional accounts on zulipchat.com.
Currently, disabled in production pending some work on visual styling.
This is intended to support our upcoming feature to support copying a
user's customization settings from an existing account that user owns
in another organization.
We essentially stop running create_realm_internal_bots during
every provisioing and move its operations to run from populate db.
In fact to speed things up a bit we actually make populate db call the
funcs which create_realm_internal_bots calls behind the scenes.
Fixes: #9467.
We extract the entire operations of the management command to a
function create_if_missing_realm_internal_bots in the
zerver/lib/onboarding.py. The logic for determining if there are any realm
internal bots which have not been created is extracted to a function
missing_any_realm_internal_bots in actions.py.
This is required because the --settings=zproject.test_settings param
doesn't work with migrate or the dumpdata management commands. Thus
untill now if one ran just this tool ended up with test database not
properly setup. We never noticed this because test-backend ran this
tool again (after exporting DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE) thus making the
tool work this time.
I've often done this by hand -- basically typed out the last line,
with the variables found from looking at the PR page in a browser.
Seems nicer for both us maintainers and the contributor, in particular
because the PR gets marked as merged, instead of closed. But it's a
bit of a pain, and I do it maybe half the time or less; plus it's kind
of a subtle GitHub feature, and as a result I think other maintainers
of Zulip repos do this approximately never.
I've always figured this couldn't be hard to automate; today I decided
to take the 45 minutes to look up how, write out the script, QA it,
write up a nice usage message and some comments, and commit it. :)
Vishnu Ks
Tim Abbott
Steve Howell
amanagr
Shubham Dhama
Umair Khan
Utkarsh Patil
Joshua Pan
Harshit Bansal
Shubham Padia
Sivakar Sithamparanathan
Yashashvi Dave
Sampriti Panda
Rhea Parekh
Robert Hönig
Aditya Bansal
Greg Price