Recent changes merged in #10877 didn't handle these events
correctly. The linkified_id function breaks for the `discount`
object in the JSON payload. A cursory glance at Stripe's docs
tells me that since a discount is associated with a customer
or a coupon, it makes sense for a `discount` object to not have
an ID that can necessarily be linked to. So, we can just link
to the associated coupon instead.
This commit changes the return type of get_possible_mentions_info to a
list instead of a dict, thus disposing off the hacky logic of storing
users with duplicate full names with name|id keys that made the code
obfuscated.
The other functions continue to use the dicts as before, however, there
are minor variable changes where needed in accordance with the updated
definition of get_possible_mentions_info.
This is required in some AWS regions.
The right long-term fix is to move to boto3 which doesn't have this
problem.
Allows us to downgrade the priority of #9376.
This code prevents the password bar from being incorrectly clear after
the sign up form is rendered again after invalid data is submitted
(generally due to forgetting to agree to ToS).
Fixes#10868.
This used to be a more likely codepath, before we introduced
Customer.has_billing_relationship. It is no longer literally impossible to
hit this race condition, so I'm not deleting the code, but it's unlikely
enough that it's not worth figuring out how to test it.
Already better tested by the upgrade and downgrade tests using mock_stripe.
Note that the line that was removed is actually not possible to reach, since
canceled subscriptions aren't shown on the Customer object.
We've had a few unpleasant bugs with real documentation links being
broken, so we're going to make this more aggressive for now.
I think we instead want a more subtle option for suppressing failures
in some places but not others.
I think this will fix a Casper flake where there was a race
window with multiple temp DOM elements holding copied text.
I also add a comment to the code I think causes this race
for the tests.
Previously, we unconditionally tried to restart the Tornado process
name corresponding to the historically always-true case of a single
Tornado process. This resulted in Tornado not being automatically
restarted on a production deployment on servers with more than one
Tornado process configured.
Previously, because the parens were added via CSS, copy-pasting the
EDITED notices resulted in junk like this:
Iago 3:51 PMEDITED
edited message content
Now, you get:
Iago 3:51 PM (EDITED)
edited message content
Status messages were incorrectly not selectable, due to a bug in how
we setup the no-select hierarchy (for making copy-paste not have weird
whitespace issues).
Fixes#10456.
For many years we have been excluding the current user
from the buddy list, since their presence is kind
of implicit, and it saves a line of real estate.
This commit removes various user-is-me checks
and puts the user back for the following reasons:
* explicit is better
* newbies will be less confused when they
can see they're actually online
* even long-time users like myself will
feel more comfortable if it's just there
* having yourself in the buddy list facilitates
things like checking your presence or sending
yourself a message
* showing "me" reinforces the meaning of the
green circle (if my circle is green and I'm
active, then others with green circles must
be active too)
* If you're literally the first user in the
realm, you can now see what the buddy list
looks like and try out the chevron menu.
The biggest tradeoff here is the opportunity cost.
For an org with more people than fit on the screen,
we put the Nth person below the fold to show "me".
I think that's fine--users can still scroll or
search.
This commit doesn't do anything special with the
current user in terms of sorting them higher in the
list or giving specific styling.
Fixes#10476
We reduce nesting of code by just early-exiting
for the `is_current_user` check.
This also forces us to be a bit more thorough
with our tests if we want to maintain line
coverage.
This function is equivalent to recipient_for_emails, but fetches
user_profiles by IDs, not by emails.
This commit is a part of our efforts surrounding #9474, but is
more primarily geared towards adding support for sending typing
notifications by user IDs.
Previously, get_user_profiles() was split into two functions:
* user_profiles_from_unvalidated_emails, which raised a
ValidationError upon encountering a non-existent user email.
* get_user_profiles, which caught the ValidationError raised
by user_profiles_from_unvalidated_emails and raised a
JsonableError instead.
According to Steve Howell, this complexity is partly a relic
of past refactoring and is unnecessarily heavy. It is better to
just raise JsonableError directly.
recipient_for_emails is used by our typing notifications code.
user_profiles_from_unvalidated_emails is used by our typing
notifications code *and* for sending messages.
user_profiles_from_unvalidated_emails is a part of a larger
framework used by Addressee to validate recipient emails when sending
messages and will eventually need to be removed as we move forward
with #9474. So it makes sense to just inline this function within
recipient_for_emails so that we don't break our typing notifications
code in the future.
This commit is a part of our efforts surrounding #9474.
This library was absolutely essential as part of our Python 2->3
migration process, but all of its calls should be either no-ops or
encode/decode operations.
Note also that the library has been wrong since the incorrect
refactoring in 1f9244e060.
Fixes#10807.
This adds a web flow and management command for reactivating a Zulip
organization, with confirmation from one of the organization
administrators.
Further work is needed to make the emails nicer (ideally, we'd send
one email with all the admins on the `To` line, but the `send_email`
library doesn't support that).
Fixes#10783.
With significant tweaks to the email text by tabbott.
The previous content made it sound like we were actually sending a
push notification, which could be confusing/alarming in some cases
(see e.g. 9c224ccdd3). Instead, we make
clear that we're sending it to all clients (which one might correctly
suspect is vacuous in the development environment).