Adds a new welcome email, `onboarding_zulip_guide`, to be sent four
days after a new user registers with a Zulip organization if the
organization has specified a particular organization type that has
a guide in the corporate `/for/.../` pages. If there is no guide,
then no email is scheduled or sent.
The current `for/communities/` page is not very useful for users
who are not organization administrators, so these onboarding guide
emails are further restricted for those organization types to
only go to new users who are invited/registered as admins for the
organzation.
Adds two database queries for new user registrations: one to get
the organization's type and one to create the scheduled email.
Adds two email logs because the email is sent both to a new user
who registers with an existing organization and to the organization
owner when they register a new organization.
Co-authored by: Alya Abbott <alya@zulip.com>
Previously, we had an architecture where CSS inlining for emails was
done at provision time in inline_email_css.py. This was necessary
because the library we were using for this, Premailer, was extremely
slow, and doing the inlining for every outgoing email would have been
prohibitively expensive.
Now that we've migrated to a more modern library that inlines the
small amount of CSS we have into emails nearly instantly, we are able
to remove the complex architecture built to work around Premailer
being slow and just do the CSS inlining as the final step in sending
each individual email.
This has several significant benefits:
* Removes a fiddly provisioning step that made the edit/refresh cycle
for modifying email templates confusing; there's no longer a CSS
inlining step that, if you forget to do it, results in your testing a
stale variant of the email templates.
* Fixes internationalization problems related to translators working
with pre-CSS-inlined emails, and then Django trying to apply the
translators to the post-CSS-inlined version.
* Makes the send_custom_email pipeline simpler and easier to improve.
Signed-off-by: Daniil Fadeev <fadeevd@zulip.com>
- Being more specific about what the user will get.
- Putting less emphasis on entering multiple emails, since most
people probably just have one email they need to check.
- Using more intuitive wording and hint that deactivated or
deleted accounts won't be included.
Fixes: #24890.
In previous commits, we updated the realm creation flow to show
the realm name, type and subdomain fields in the first form
when asking for the email of the user. This commit updates the
user registration form to show the already filled realm details
as non-editable text and there is also a button to edit the
realm details before registration.
We also update the sub-heading for user registration form as
mentioned in the issue.
Fixes part of #24307.
We now show inputs for realm details like name, type and URL
in the create_realm.html template opened for "/new" url and
these information will be stored in PreregistrationRealm
objects in further commits.
We add a new class RealmDetailsForm in forms.py for this
such that it is used as a base class for RealmCreationForm
and we define RealmDetailsForm such that we can use it as
a subclass for RegistrationForm as well to avoid duplication.
This commit extracts realm creation form html in a new file
realm_creation_form.html as we are reworking the organization
flow as per #24307 and this change would allow us to avoid
duplicating the code.
This commit updates the ID for form element in create_realm.html
to "create_realm" as we would need to update the error handling
for this page in further commits and we do not want to break it
for other forms using "send_confirm" as ID.
This just replaces the billing/upgrade with the statement that
"Your organization has requested sponsored or discounted hosting.", so
it should include an obvious contact in case the customer wants to amend
something or just bump a request that may have gotten missed.
Previously this was only available on the upgrade page - meaning an
organization that already bought a plan wouldn't be able to request a
sponsorship to get a discount or such, even if qualified.
The string "Or import from Slack, Mattermost, Gitter, or
Rocket.Chat." in create_realm.html was not tagged for
translation before. This commit fixes it to tag the string
for translation.
`render_markdown_path` renders Markdown, and also (since baff121115)
runs Jinja2 on the resulting HTML.
The `pure_markdown` flag was added in 0a99fa2fd6, and did two
things: retried the path directly in the filesystem if it wasn't found
by the Jinja2 resolver, and also skipped the subsequent Jinja2
templating step (regardless of where the content was found). In this
context, the name `pure_markdown` made some sense. The only two
callsites were the TOS and privacy policy renders, which might have
had user-supplied arbitrary paths, and we wished to handle absolute
paths in addition to ones inside `templates/`.
Unfortunately, the follow-up of 01bd55bbcb did not refactor the
logic -- it changed it, by making `pure_markdown` only do the former
of the two behaviors. Passing `pure_markdown=True` after that commit
still caused it to always run Jinja2, but allowed it to look elsewhere
in the filesystem.
This set the stage for calls, such as the one introduced in
dedea23745, which passed both a context for Jinja2, as well as
`pure_markdown=True` implying that Jinja2 was not to be used.
Split the two previous behaviors of the `pure_markdown` flag, and use
pre-existing data to control them, rather than an explicit flag. For
handling policy information which is stored at an absolute path
outside of the template root, we switch to using the template search
path if and only if the path is relative. This also closes the
potential inconsistency based on CWD when `pure_markdown=True` was
passed and the path was relative, not absolute.
Decide whether to run Jinja2 based on if a context is passed in at
all. This restores the behavior in the initial 0a99fa2fd6 where a
call to `rendar_markdown_path` could be made to just render markdown,
and not some other unmentioned and unrelated templating language as
well.
Currently, there is a checkbox setting for whether to
"Include realm name in subject of message notification emails".
This commit replaces the checkbox setting with a dropdown
having values: Automatic [default], Always, Never.
The Automatic option includes the realm name if, and only if,
there are multiple Zulip realms associated with the user's email.
Tests are added and(or) modified.
Fixes: #19905.
Adds a section in the development community norms about using the
custom linkifiers in chat.zulip for the different Zulip project
repositories on GitHub.
While the function which processes the realm registration and
signup remains the same, we use different urls and functions to
call the process so that we can separately track them. This will
help us know the conversion rate of realm registration after
receiving the confirmation link.
Creates new help article for supported web browsers. Also updates
links in the `/apps` landing page as well as the unsupported-browser
template and the `set-up-your-account` article.
Fixes#14732.
Updates the Asana documentation, which was a detailed version
of the Zapier documentation with screenshots specifically for
Asana, to instead start with the basic incoming webhook steps
and then point to the general Zapier documentation to complete
the integration.
This will be easier to maintain moving forward in the short
term as ideally we'll migrate to a system that documents all
of the integrations with Zulip that are available via Zapier.
Also, updates the current Zapier documentation to mention
Asana as one of the apps that can be integrated with Zulip.
Lauryn Menard
Daniil Fadeev
Anders Kaseorg
Josh Klar
David Rosa
Aman Agrawal
Sahil Batra
Mateusz Mandera
Alya Abbott
Alex Vandiver
Prakhar Pratyush
Lauryn Menard
