These metadata are essentially all publicily available anyway, and
making uploading them unconditional will simplify some things.
The documentation is not quite accurate in that it claims the server
will upload some metadata that is not actually uploaded yet (but will
by soon). This seems harmless.
This may happen if there are multiple servers with the same UUID
submitting data (e.g. if they were cloned after initial creation), or
if there is one server, but `./manage.py clear_analytics_tables` was
used to truncate the analytics tables.
In the case of `clear_analytics_tables`, the data submitted likely has
identical historical values with new remote `id` values; preserving
the originally-submitted contemporaneous data is the best option. For
the case of submissions from multiple servers, there is no completely
sensible outcome, so the best we can do is detect the case and move
on.
Since we have a lock on the RemoteZulipServer, we know that no other
inserts are happening, so counting before and after will return the
true number of rows inserted (which `bulk_create` cannot do in the
face of `ignore_conflicts`[^1]). We compare this to the expected
number of new inserted rows to detect dropped duplicates.
[^1]: See https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/30138.
This is a useful helper using the same API as
send_analytics_to_push_bouncer(), but uploading only realms info. This
is useful to upload realms info without the risk of taking a long time
to process the request due to too much of the *Count analytics data.
This makes it possible to send notifications to more than one app ID
from the same server: for example, the main Zulip mobile app and the
new Flutter-based app, which has a separate app ID for use through its
beta period so that it can be installed alongside the existing app.
This is a CountStat for tracking how many mobile notifications the
server requested.
1. On a self-hosted server, that means requesting from the push bouncer.
2. On a server that's its own push bouncer, that's just the number
directly sent.
This number has room for inaccuracy due to incrementing by the number of
user devices on a self-hosted server, as it doesn't account for errors
that may occur in the GCM/APNs low-level sending codepaths on the bouncer.
Also tests that a server that's its own push bouncer correctly
increments its mobile_pushes_sent::day CountStat, by basing it on the
values returned from the send_apple/android_push_notification functions
which tell us the actual number of successfully sent notifications.
Since the return values of send_..._push_notification are now
used in those codepaths, we need to tweak our mocks in some unrelated
tests to set up some return value to avoid errors.
Add the new model for recording basic information about Realms on remote
server, to go with the other analytics data. Also adds necessary changes
to the bouncer endpoint and the send_analytics_to_push_bouncer()
function to submit such Realm information.
We'll need this information in order to properly direct APNs
notifications. Happily, the Zulip server always sends it when
registering an APNs token; and it appears it always has done so
since the commit:
cddee49e7 Add support infrastructure for push notification bouncer service.
back in 2016. So there's no compatibility issue from requiring it.
This missing `REQ` call has meant we just drop this parameter:
even though the remote Zulip server passes it (for all APNs tokens),
we never notice and never store it. Fix that.
We're going to need to use this information, so we shouldn't just
assume a value; the client should tell us the actual value.
Conveniently, the Zulip mobile app does already pass this parameter
and has since forever. So we can just start requiring it, with no
compatibility constraint.
We already always pass this parameter from the mobile client,
so this makes the tests more realistic already. And we'll shortly
be making this parameter required.
The former name is kind of misleading - this function is for the remote
server to send analytics to the push bouncer. Under our usual
terminology, a "remote server" is a self-hosted Zulip server. So data is
sent FROM not TO a remote server.
This reverts b8581e2895. The mobile
client on Android parses this field using:
```kotlin
timeMs = data.require("time").parseLong("time") * 1000
```
This throws an error if value is not `long` (i.e. an integer),
resulting in dropped notifications on Android from servers which had
deployed b8581e2895.
Switch back to sending an integer, but keep the behaviour from
fd6091ad17 where we send the timestamp in the payload of both
Android and Apple push notifications.
The `expected` flag was incredibly confusing, as you
couldn't tell from the calling code what you were
actually expecting to happen.
I avoid the context manager idiom in order to force
the callers to create simple helper functions, and
I de-duplicate some code in some places.
I also force the caller to explicitly soft-deactivate
the user with one simple line of code, so that the
person reading the test doesn't have to research
the side effects of the helper. (And I make it
very easy for new authors to follow the practice
going forward.)
This is also somewhat of a prep commit to avoid
the obfuscated use of refresh_from_db.
'test_get_message_payload_gcm_stream_message' verifies the payload
for notifications generated (for stream messages) due to any of the
push notification triggers, including
'NotificationTriggers.STREAM_PUSH'.
Earlier, 'test_get_message_payload_gcm_stream_notifications' tested
the same thing as 'test_get_message_payload_gcm_stream_message' with
the only difference that it included content that was not truncated.
This commit removes the test
'test_get_message_payload_gcm_stream_notifications' and updates
the test 'test_get_message_payload_gcm_stream_message' to cover
both the cases, i.e., truncated as well as not truncated content.
This commit removes the 'alert' field from the payload for
Android via GCM/FCM.
The alert strings generated do not get used at all and have
not been used since at least 2019. On Android, we construct
the notification UI ourselves in the client, and we ignore
the alert string.
This commit adds a test to verify the payload
'get_message_payload_apns' returns when the notification trigger is
'NotificationTriggers.FOLLOWED_TOPIC_PUSH'.
This commit updates the 'get_apns_alert_subtitle' function to
return a common subtitle, i.e., "{full_name} mentioned everyone:"
for wildcard mentions.
The triggers for the stream or topic wildcard mentions include:
* NotificationTriggers.TOPIC_WILDCARD_MENTION_IN_FOLLOWED_TOPIC
* NotificationTriggers.STREAM_WILDCARD_MENTION_IN_FOLLOWED_TOPIC
* NotificationTriggers.TOPIC_WILDCARD_MENTION
* NotificationTriggers.STREAM_WILDCARD_MENTION
This migration applies under the assumption that extra_data_json has
been populated for all existing and coming audit log entries.
- This removes the manual conversions back and forth for extra_data
throughout the codebase including the orjson.loads(), orjson.dumps(),
and str() calls.
- The custom handler used for converting Decimal is removed since
DjangoJSONEncoder handles that for extra_data.
- We remove None-checks for extra_data because it is now no longer
nullable.
- Meanwhile, we want the bouncer to support processing RealmAuditLog entries for
remote servers before and after the JSONField migration on extra_data.
- Since now extra_data should always be a dict for the newer remote
server, which is now migrated, the test cases are updated to create
RealmAuditLog objects by passing a dict for extra_data before
sending over the analytics data. Note that while JSONField allows for
non-dict values, a proper remote server always passes a dict for
extra_data.
- We still test out the legacy extra_data format because not all
remote servers have migrated to use JSONField extra_data.
This verifies that support for extra_data being a string or None has not
been dropped.
Co-authored-by: Siddharth Asthana <siddharthasthana31@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This commit renames the 'PRIVATE_MESSAGE' attribute of the
'NotificationTriggers' class to 'DIRECT_MESSAGE'.
Custom migration to update the existing value in the database.
It includes 'TODO/compatibility' code to support the old
notification trigger value 'private_message' in the
push notification queue during the Zulip server upgrades.
Earlier 'private_message' was one of the possible values for the
'trigger' property of the '[`POST /zulip-outgoing-webhook`]' response;
Update the docs to reflect the change in the above-mentioned trigger
value.
This commit removes the stray strings used to refer to
various types of notification triggers.
We use the attributes of the 'NotificationTriggers' class instead.
The long-term idle topic participants are soft-reactivated
after email/push notifications are sent due to @topic mention.
The reason being that, generally, @topic mentions are going to
reach a small set of users who have a decent chance of being
reactivated by the notifications.
This commit completes the notifications part of the @topic
wildcard mention feature.
Notifications are sent to the topic participants for the
@topic wildcard mention.
This commit updates the existing tests in 'test_email_notifications'
and 'test_push_notifications' to properly configure user settings
and visibility policies before running the actual tests.
Earlier, the tests were passing, but the corner case expected
to be covered wasn't covered.
This should have been included in
d80779435a.
These comments should not have been included in
a8fd9eb701.
We covered the case "Private message should soft reactivate
the user" earlier in the test. So the comment was rightly added
there.
During stream wildcard or group mention, no such personal mention
is involved; hence, the comments are not needed.
This prep commit replaces the 'wildcard' keyword in the codebase
with 'stream_wildcard' at some places for better readability, as
we plan to introduce 'topic_wildcards' as a part of the
'@topic mention' project.
Currently, 'wildcards = ["all", "everyone", "stream"]' which is an
alias to mention everyone in the stream, hence better renamed as
'stream_wildcards'.
Eventually, we will have:
'stream_wildcard' as an alias to mention everyone in the stream.
'topic_wildcard' as an alias to mention everyone in the topic.
'wildcard' refers to 'stream_wildcard' and 'topic_wildcard' as a whole.
The 'get_gcm_alert' and 'get_apns_alert_subtitle' functions
don't include the case when the trigger is
'NotificationTriggers.FOLLOWED_TOPIC_WILDCARD_MENTION'.
This commit updates the functions to include
'NotificationTriggers.FOLLOWED_TOPIC_WILDCARD_MENTION'.
Note that we use the DjangoJSONEncoder so that we have builtin support
for parsing Decimal and datetime.
During this intermediate state, the migration that creates
extra_data_json field has been run. We prepare for running the backfilling
migration that populates extra_data_json from extra_data.
This change implements double-write, which is important to keep the
state of extra data consistent. For most extra_data usage, this is
handled by the overriden `save` method on `AbstractRealmAuditLog`, where
we either generates extra_data_json using orjson.loads or
ast.literal_eval.
While backfilling ensures that old realm audit log entries have
extra_data_json populated, double-write ensures that any new entries
generated will also have extra_data_json set. So that we can then safely
rename extra_data_json to extra_data while ensuring the non-nullable
invariant.
For completeness, we additionally set RealmAuditLog.NEW_VALUE for
the USER_FULL_NAME_CHANGED event. This cannot be handled with the
overridden `save`.
This addresses: https://github.com/zulip/zulip/pull/23116#discussion_r1040277795
Note that extra_data_json at this point is not used yet. So the test
cases do not need to switch to testing extra_data_json. This is later
done after we rename extra_data_json to extra_data.
Double-write for the remote server audit logs is special, because we only
get the dumped bytes from an external source. Luckily, none of the
payload carries extra_data that is not generated using orjson.dumps for
audit logs of event types in SYNC_BILLING_EVENTS. This can be verified
by looking at:
`git grep -A 6 -E "event_type=.*(USER_CREATED|USER_ACTIVATED|USER_DEACTIVATED|USER_REACTIVATED|USER_ROLE_CHANGED|REALM_DEACTIVATED|REALM_REACTIVATED)"`
Therefore, we just need to populate extra_data_json doing an
orjson.loads call after a None-check.
Co-authored-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This adds support to accepting extra_data being dict from remote
servers' RealmAuditLog entries. So that it is forward-compatible with
servers that have migrated to use JSONField for RealmAuditLog just in
case. This prepares us for migrating zilencer's audit log models to use
JSONField for extra_data.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This prepares for the audit log migration which requires us to populate
a JSONField from the extra_data field. "data" is not representative of
the actual extra_data field for RealmAuditLog entries of event types
in SYNC_BILLING_EVENTS.
We intentionally leave the test cases unchanged without bothering to
verify if the extra_data arrives as-is to keep this change minimal.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Servers that had upgraded from a Zulip server version that did not yet
support the user_uuid field to one that did could end up with some
mobile devices having two push notifications registrations, one with a
user_id and the other with a user_uuid.
Fix this issue by sending both user_id and user_uuid, and clearing
"check_add_user_group" is a safer helper function than
"create_user_group" to use when creating user_groups. It does
error handling and notify the client with the appropriate event.
Note that the populate_db command still uses "create_user_group"
because we do not need to enqueue events at that point.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Since this function creates a new user group into the database,
it is more appropriate to have it not as a generic "lib" function
but as an "action".
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Black 23 enforces some slightly more specific rules about empty line
counts and redundant parenthesis removal, but the result is still
compatible with Black 22.
(This does not actually upgrade our Python environment to Black 23
yet.)
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This commit adds the OPTIONAL .realm attribute to Message
(and ArchivedMessage), with the server changes for making new Messages
have this set. Old Messages still have to be migrated to backfill this,
before it can be non-nullable.
Appropriate test changes to correctly set .realm for Messages the tests
manually create are included here as well.
Recipient with type PERSONAL type_id 1 is a Recipient for a system bot,
since those get created first. Even if it doesn't break tests, it's
still bad, because it is not the intention of those tests to simulate a
cross-realm private message to a system bot.
This is preparatory commit for #18941.
Importing `do_delete_message` from `message_edit.py` was causing a
circular import error. In order to avoid that, we create a separate
message_delete.py file which has all the functions related to deleting
messages.
The tests for deleting messages are present in
`zerver/tests/test_message_edit.py`.
Fixes a part of #18941
django.request logs responses with 5xx response codes (our configuration
of the logger prevents it from logging 4xx as well which it normally
does too). However, it does it without the traceback which results in
quite unhelpful log message that look like
"Bad Gateway:/api/v1/users/me/apns_device_token" - particularly
confusing when sent via email to server admins.
The solution here is to do the logging ourselves, using Django's
log_response() (which is meant for this purpose), and including the
traceback. Django tracks (via response._has_been_logged attribute) that
the response has already been logged, and knows to not duplicate that
action. See log_response() in django's codebase for these details.
Fixes#19596.
It seems helpful for this to get logged with the traceback rather than
just the general
"<exception name> while trying to connect to push notification bouncer."
This allows us to separate the zilencer paths from other JSON paths,
with explicit type annotation expecting `RemoteZulipServer` as the
second parameter of the handler using
authenticated_remote_server_view.
The test case is also updated to remove a test for a situation that no
longer occurs anymore, since we don't perform subdomain checks on
remote servers.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Removes `token_kind` parameter being passed to
`remove_apns_device_token` and `remove_android_reg_id` code
paths / endpoints. Possibly missed in a refactor of this
function as the tests for adding these tokens do not pass
a `token_kind` parameter.
Removes `zulip_org_id` and `zulip_org_kay` from code testing
`deactivate_remote_server`. These parameters are passed when
a remote server is added, so possibly a copy and paste error
when these tests were written / last refactored.
Previous behavior was logging only the uuid if it was provided by the
remote server, but that's insufficient, because the user may actually
have no devices registered with uuis and we (at the bouncer) end up
sending notifications to id-based registrations. Not having that id
logged makes it impossible to figure out what's going on.
Fixes#18017.
In previous commits, the change to the bouncer API was introduced to
support this and then a series of migrations added .uuid to
UserProfiles.
Now the code for self-hosted servers that makes requests
to the bouncer is changed to make use of it.
This is the first step to making the full switch to self-hosted servers
use user uuids, per issue #18017. The old id format is still supported
of course, for backward compatibility.
This commit is separate in order to allow deploying *just* the bouncer
API change to production first.
When removing notifications, we skip the access control on if the user
still can read them -- they should not have a notification of them,
both because they currently cannot read the message, as well as
because they have already done so.
aioapns 2.1 removed the loop parameter from the aioapns.APNs
constructor, because Python 3.10 removed the loop parameter from the
asyncio.Lock constructor.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
get_remote_server_by_uuid (called in validate_api_key) raises
ValidationError when given an invalid UUID due to how Django handles
UUIDField. We don't want that exception and prefer the ordinary
DoesNotExist exception to be raised.
APNs payloads nest the zulip-custom data further than the top level,
as Android notifications do. This led to APNs data silently never
being truncated; this case was not caught in tests because the mocks
provided the wrong data for the APNs structure.
Adjust to look in the appropriate place within the APNs data, and
truncate that.
As explained in the comments in the code, just doing UUID(string) and
catching ValueError is not enough, because the uuid library sometimes
tries to modify the string to convert it into a valid UUID:
>>> a = '18cedb98-5222-5f34-50a9-fc418e1ba972'
>>> uuid.UUID(a, version=4)
UUID('18cedb98-5222-4f34-90a9-fc418e1ba972')
Given that these values are uuids, it's better to use UUIDField which is
meant for exactly that, rather than an arbitrary CharField.
This requires modifying some tests to use valid uuids.
We now complain if a test author sends a stream message
that does not result in the sender getting a
UserMessage row for the message.
This is basically 100% equivalent to complaining that
the author failed to subscribe the sender to the stream
as part of the test setup, as far as I can tell, so the
AssertionError instructs the author to subscribe the
sender to the stream.
We exempt bots from this check, although it is
plausible we should only exempt the system bots like
the notification bot.
I considered auto-subscribing the sender to the stream,
but that can be a little more expensive than the
current check, and we generally want test setup to be
explicit.
If there is some legitimate way than a subscribed human
sender can't get a UserMessage, then we probably want
an explicit test for that, or we may want to change the
backend to just write a UserMessage row in that
hypothetical situation.
For most tests, including almost all the ones fixed
here, the author just wants their test setup to
realistically reflect normal operation, and often devs
may not realize that Cordelia is not subscribed to
Denmark or not realize that Hamlet is not subscribed to
Scotland.
Some of us don't remember our Shakespeare from high
school, and our stream subscriptions don't even
necessarily reflect which countries the Bard placed his
characters in.
There may also be some legitimate use case where an
author wants to simulate sending a message to an
unsubscribed stream, but for those edge cases, they can
always set allow_unsubscribed_sender to True.
This makes logging more consistent between FCM and APNs codepaths, and
makes clear which user-ids are for local users, and which are opaque
integers namespaced from some remote zulip server.
Being able to determine how many distinct users are getting push
notifications per remote host is useful, as is the distribution of
device counts. This parallels the log line in
handle_push_notification for push notifications from local realms,
handled via the event queue.
aioapns already has a retry loop. By default it retries forever on
ConnectionError and ConnectionClosed, so our own retry loop would
never be reached. Remove our retry loop, and configure aioapns to
retry APNS_MAX_RETRIES times on ConnectionError like the previous
version did. It still retries forever on ConnectionClosed; that’s not
configurable but probably fine.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
These changes are all independent of each other; I just didn’t feel
like making dozens of commits for them.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Previously, we checked for the `enable_offline_email_notifications` and
`enable_offline_push_notifications` settings (which determine whether the
user will receive notifications for PMs and mentions) just before sending
notifications. This has a few problem:
1. We do not have access to all the user settings in the notification
handlers (`handle_missedmessage_emails` and `handle_push_notifications`),
and therefore, we cannot correctly determine whether the notification should
be sent. Checks like the following which existed previously, will, for
example, incorrectly not send notifications even when stream email
notifications are enabled-
```
if not receives_offline_email_notifications(user_profile):
return
```
With this commit, we simply do not enqueue notifications if the "offline"
settings are disabled, which fixes that bug.
Additionally, this also fixes a bug with the "online push notifications"
feature, which was, if someone were to:
* turn off notifications for PMs and mentions (`enable_offline_push_notifications`)
* turn on stream push notifications (`enable_stream_push_notifications`)
* turn on "online push" (`enable_online_push_notifications`)
then, they would still receive notifications for PMs when online.
This isn't how the "online push enabled" feature is supposed to work;
it should only act as a wrapper around the other notification settings.
The buggy code was this in `handle_push_notifications`:
```
if not (
receives_offline_push_notifications(user_profile)
or receives_online_push_notifications(user_profile)
):
return
// send notifications
```
This commit removes that code, and extends our `notification_data.py` logic
to cover this case, along with tests.
2. The name for these settings is slightly misleading. They essentially
talk about "what to send notifications for" (PMs and mentions), and not
"when to send notifications" (offline). This commit improves this condition
by restricting the use of this term only to the database field, and using
clearer names everywhere else. This distinction will be important to have
non-confusing code when we implement multiple options for notifications
in the future as dropdown (never/when offline/when offline or online, etc).
3. We should ideally re-check all notification settings just before the
notifications are sent. This is especially important for email notifications,
which may be sent after a long time after the message was sent. We will
in the future add code to thoroughly re-check settings before sending
notifications in a clean manner, but temporarily not re-checking isn't
a terrible scenario either.
This fixes a batch of mypy errors of the following format:
'Item "None" of "Optional[Something]" has no attribute "abc"
Since we have already been recklessly using these attritbutes
in the tests, adding assertions beforehand is justified presuming
that they oughtn't to be None.
This reduces loose strings in the codebase, and allows us to not worry
about the exact naming (`stream_email_enabled` or `stream_emails_enabled`?)
and tense (`mentioned` or `mention`?).
Ideally this new class should have been in `lib/notification_data.py`,
which is our file for things like this. But, the next commit requires
using this data in `models.py`, and importing from `notification_data.py`
to `models.py` causes recursive imports.
The code to also notify for wildcard mentions was added in
0ed0bb6828.
But that showed the same text for both the cases. This commit fixes
that.
This is more of change for correctness. The mobile app currently does
not rely on this text for notifications, but constructs the text by
itself from the data in the payload.
This also fixes the "stream_push_notify" case to consistently show
a `#` before the stream name.
The previous string was bold, potentially confusing, and doesn't
explain clearly what's happening. We replace this with a string that's
more or less copied from what we do in email notifications with the
similar setting enabled.
It was unclear what the original test was testing, and more
importantly, the test passed even if one removed the `read` flag
check in the `handle_push_notifications` function, so we fix it
to be more comprehensive.
Changed the name of the test-user cordelia from `Cordelia Lear` to
`Cordelia, Lear's daughter`.
This change will enable us to test users with escape characters in
their names.
I also updated the Node, Puppeteer, Backend tests and Fixtures to
support this change.
Tim Abbott
Mateusz Mandera
Alex Vandiver
Greg Price
Anders Kaseorg
Steve Howell
Prakhar Pratyush
Zixuan James Li
Lauryn Menard
Zixuan Li
madrix01
Zixuan James Li
Steve Howell
Eeshan Garg
Abhijeet Prasad Bodas
Dinesh
Vishnu KS
Hashir Sarwar
akshatdalton
Arun Sankar