bed6d5a789
I actually like this pattern:
def check_send_typing_notification(...):
typing_notification = check_typing_notification(...)
do_send_typing_notification(...)
It can help divide responsibilities nicely and make it easy
to write detailed unit tests against each of the two helpers.
Unfortunately, the good things didn't really happen here, and
instead we got the worst aspects of the pattern:
- The responsibilities for validation leaked into
the second function.
- Both functions were doing sane things individually
that became not-so-sane in the big picture (namely,
we ended up making Recipient objects for no reason,
but if you read each of the helpers, it was just one
step that seemed reasonable).
- Passing around dictionaries for results can be annoying.
Also, the pattern made a lot more sense when the validation
for typing was a lot more complicated. My prior commit makes
it so that we only ever deal with a list of user_ids.
Anyway, now I'm inlining it. :)
Subsequent commits will clean up the more substantive issue
here, which is that we are building Recipients for no reason.
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .circleci | ||
| .github | ||
| .tx | ||
| analytics | ||
| confirmation | ||
| corporate | ||
| docs | ||
| frontend_tests | ||
| locale | ||
| pgroonga | ||
| puppet | ||
| requirements | ||
| scripts | ||
| static | ||
| stubs | ||
| templates | ||
| tools | ||
| zerver | ||
| zilencer | ||
| zproject | ||
| zthumbor | ||
| .browserslistrc | ||
| .codecov.yml | ||
| .editorconfig | ||
| .eslintignore | ||
| .eslintrc.json | ||
| .gitattributes | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| .gitlint | ||
| .isort.cfg | ||
| .npmignore | ||
| .stylelintrc | ||
| .travis.yml | ||
| .yarnrc | ||
| CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md | ||
| CONTRIBUTING.md | ||
| Dockerfile-postgresql | ||
| LICENSE | ||
| NOTICE | ||
| README.md | ||
| Vagrantfile | ||
| babel.config.js | ||
| manage.py | ||
| mypy.ini | ||
| package.json | ||
| postcss.config.js | ||
| tsconfig.json | ||
| version.py | ||
| yarn.lock | ||
README.md
Zulip overview
Zulip is a powerful, open source group chat application that combines the immediacy of real-time chat with the productivity benefits of threaded conversations. Zulip is used by open source projects, Fortune 500 companies, large standards bodies, and others who need a real-time chat system that allows users to easily process hundreds or thousands of messages a day. With over 500 contributors merging over 500 commits a month, Zulip is also the largest and fastest growing open source group chat project.
Getting started
Click on the appropriate link below. If nothing seems to apply, join us on the Zulip community server and tell us what's up!
You might be interested in:
-
Contributing code. Check out our guide for new contributors to get started. Zulip prides itself on maintaining a clean and well-tested codebase, and a stock of hundreds of beginner-friendly issues.
-
Contributing non-code. Report an issue, translate Zulip into your language, write for the Zulip blog, or give us feedback. We would love to hear from you, even if you're just trying the product out.
-
Supporting Zulip. Advocate for your organization to use Zulip, write a review in the mobile app stores, or upvote Zulip on product comparison sites.
-
Checking Zulip out. The best way to see Zulip in action is to drop by the Zulip community server. We also recommend reading Zulip for open source, Zulip for companies, or Zulip for working groups and part time communities.
-
Running a Zulip server. Use a preconfigured Digital Ocean droplet, install Zulip directly, or use Zulip's experimental Docker image. Commercial support is available; see https://zulipchat.com/plans for details.
-
Using Zulip without setting up a server. https://zulipchat.com offers free and commercial hosting, including providing our paid plan for free to fellow open source projects.
-
Participating in outreach programs like Google Summer of Code.
You may also be interested in reading our blog or following us on twitter. Zulip is distributed under the Apache 2.0 license.