zulip/docs/front-end-build-process.md

Static asset pipeline

This page documents additional information that may be useful when developing new features for Zulip that require front-end changes, especially those that involve adding new files. For a more general overview, see the new feature tutorial.

Primary build process

Most of the existing JS in Zulip is written in IIFE-wrapped modules, one per file in the static/js directory. When running Zulip in development mode, each file is loaded separately, to make reloading nice and efficient. In production mode (and when creating a release tarball using tools/build-release-tarball), JavaScript files are concatenated and minified. We use the django pipeline extension to manage our static assets.

Adding static files

To add a static file to the app (JavaScript, CSS, images, etc), first add it to the appropriate place under static/.

• Third-party files that we haven't patched should be installed via npm, so that it's easy to upgrade them and third-party code doesn't bloat the Zulip repository. You can then access them in JS_SPECS via their paths under node_modules (technically, static/node_modules, but the static is automatically appended). You'll want to add these to the package.json in the root of the repository, and then provision (to have npm download them) before continuing. Your commit should also update PROVISION_VERSION in version.py.
• Third-party files that we have patched should all go in static/third/. Tag the commit with "[third]" when adding or modifying a third-party package. Our goal is to the extent possible to eliminate patched third-party code from the project.
• Our own JavaScript lives under static/js; CSS lives under static/styles. Portico JavaScript ("portico" means for logged-out pages) lives under static/js/portico.

After you add a new JavaScript file, it needs to be specified in the JS_SPECS dictionary defined in zproject/settings.py to be included in the concatenated file; this will magically ensure it is available both in development and production. Similarly, CSS should be added to the STYLESHEETS section of PIPELINE in zproject/settings.py. A few notes on doing this:

• If you plan to only use the JS/CSS within the app proper, and not on the login page or other standalone pages, put it in the app bundle.
• If you plan to use it in both, put it in the common bundle.
• If it's just used on a single standalone page (e.g. /stats), give it its own bundle. To load a bundle in the relevant Jinja2 template for that page, use minified_js and stylesheet for JS and CSS, respectively.

If you want to test minified files in development, look for the PIPELINE_ENABLED = line in zproject/settings.py and set it to True -- or just set DEBUG = False.

Note that static/html/{400,5xx}.html will only render properly if minification is enabled, since they, by nature, hardcode the path static/min/portico.css.

How it works in production

You can learn a lot from reading about django-pipeline, but a few useful notes are:

• Zulip installs static assets in production in /home/zulip/prod-static. When a new version is deployed, before the server is restarted, files are copied into that directory.
• We use the VFL (Versioned File Layout) strategy, where each file in the codebase (e.g. favicon.ico) gets a new name (e.g. favicon.c55d45ae8c58.ico) that contains a hash in it. Each deployment, has a manifest file (e.g. /home/zulip/deployments/current/staticfiles.json) that maps codebase filenames to serving filenames for that deployment. The benefit of this VFL approach is that all the static files for past deployments can coexist, which in turn eliminates most classes of race condition bugs where browser windows opened just before a deployment can't find their static assets. It also is necessary for any incremental rollout strategy where different clients get different versions of the site.
• Some paths for files (e.g. emoji) are stored in the rendered_content of past messages, and thus cannot be removed without breaking the rendering of old messages (or doing a mass-rerender of old messages).

Experimental Webpack/CommonJS modules

This section is experimental and largely irrelevant unless you're interested in helping migrate Zulip to a more modern static asset pipeline.

New JS written for Zulip can be written as CommonJS modules (bundled using webpack, though this will be taken care of automatically whenever run-dev.py is running). (CommonJS is the same module format that Node uses, so see the Node documentation for more information on the syntax.)

Benefits of using CommonJS modules over the IIFE module approach:

• namespacing/module boilerplate will be added automatically in the bundling process
• dependencies between modules are more explicit and easier to trace
• no separate list of JS files needs to be maintained for concatenation and minification
• third-party libraries can be more easily installed/versioned using npm
• running the same code in the browser and in Node for testing is simplified (as both environments use the same module syntax)

The entry point file for the bundle generated by webpack is static/js/src/main.js. Any modules you add will need to be required from this file (or one of its dependencies) in order to be included in the script bundle.