# Web frontend unit tests As an alternative to the black-box whole-app testing, you can unit test individual JavaScript files that use the module pattern. For example, to test the `foobar.js` file, you would first add the following to the bottom of `foobar.js`: > if (typeof module !== 'undefined') { > module.exports = foobar; > } This makes `foobar.js` follow the CommonJS module pattern, so it can be required in Node.js, which runs our tests. Now create `frontend_tests/node_tests/foobar.js`. At the top, require the [Node.js assert module](http://nodejs.org/api/assert.html), and the module you're testing, like so: > var assert = require('assert'); > var foobar = require('js/foobar.js'); (If the module you're testing depends on other modules, or modifies global state, you need to also read [the next section](handling-dependencies_).) Define and call some tests using the [assert module](http://nodejs.org/api/assert.html). Note that for "equal" asserts, the *actual* value comes first, the *expected* value second. > (function test_somefeature() { > assert.strictEqual(foobar.somefeature('baz'), 'quux'); > assert.throws(foobar.somefeature('Invalid Input')); > }()); The test runner (`index.js`) automatically runs all .js files in the frontend\_tests/node directory. ## HTML output The JavaScript unit tests can generate output to be viewed in the browser. The best examples of this are in `frontend_tests/node_tests/templates.js`. The main use case for this mechanism is to be able to unit test templates and see how they are rendered without the complications of the surrounding app. (Obviously, you still need to test the app itself!) The HTML output can also help to debug the unit tests. Each test calls a method named `write_handlebars_output` after it renders a template with similar data. This API is still evolving, but you should be able to look at existing code for patterns. When you run `tools/test-js-with-node`, it will present you with a message like "To see more output, open var/test-js-with-node/index.html." Basically, you just need to open the file in the browser. (If you are running a VM, this might require switching to another terminal window to launch the `open` command.) ## Coverage reports You can automatically generate coverage reports for the JavaScript unit tests like this: > tools/test-js-with-node cover Then open `coverage/lcov-report/js/index.html` in your browser. Modules we don't test *at all* aren't listed in the report, so this tends to overstate how good our overall coverage is, but it's accurate for individual files. You can also click a filename to see the specific statements and branches not tested. 100% branch coverage isn't necessarily possible, but getting to at least 80% branch coverage is a good goal. ## Handling dependencies in unit tests The following scheme helps avoid tests leaking globals between each other. First, if you can avoid globals, do it, and the code that is directly under test can simply be handled like this: > var search = require('js/search_suggestion.js'); For deeper dependencies, you want to categorize each module as follows: - Exercise the module's real code for deeper, more realistic testing? - Stub out the module's interface for more control, speed, and isolation? - Do some combination of the above? For all the modules where you want to run actual code, add a statement like the following to the top of your test file: > add_dependencies({ > _: 'third/underscore/underscore.js', > util: 'js/util.js', > Dict: 'js/dict.js', > Handlebars: 'handlebars', > Filter: 'js/filter.js', > typeahead_helper: 'js/typeahead_helper.js', > stream_data: 'js/stream_data.js', > narrow: 'js/narrow.js' > }); For modules that you want to completely stub out, please use a pattern like this: > set_global('page_params', { > email: 'bob@zulip.com' > }); > > // then maybe further down > global.page_params.email = 'alice@zulip.com'; Finally, there's the hybrid situation, where you want to borrow some of a module's real functionality but stub out other pieces. Obviously, this is a pretty strong smell that the other module might be lacking in cohesion, but that code might be outside your jurisdiction. The pattern here is this: > // Use real versions of parse/unparse > var narrow = require('js/narrow.js'); > set_global('narrow', { > parse: narrow.parse, > unparse: narrow.unparse > }); > > // But later, I want to stub the stream without having to call super-expensive > // real code like narrow.activate(). > global.narrow.stream = function () { > return 'office'; > };