from django.http import HttpRequest, HttpResponse from django.utils.translation import ugettext as _ from zerver.decorator import \ has_request_variables, REQ from zerver.lib.actions import do_add_reaction, do_remove_reaction from zerver.lib.emoji import check_emoji_request, emoji_name_to_emoji_code from zerver.lib.message import access_message from zerver.lib.request import JsonableError from zerver.lib.response import json_success from zerver.models import Message, Reaction, UserMessage, UserProfile from typing import Optional def create_historical_message(user_profile: UserProfile, message: Message) -> None: # Users can see and react to messages sent to streams they # were not a subscriber to; in order to receive events for # those, we give the user a `historical` UserMessage objects # for the message. This is the same trick we use for starring # messages. UserMessage.objects.create(user_profile=user_profile, message=message, flags=UserMessage.flags.historical | UserMessage.flags.read) @has_request_variables def add_reaction(request: HttpRequest, user_profile: UserProfile, message_id: int, emoji_name: str=REQ(), emoji_code: Optional[str]=REQ(default=None), reaction_type: str=REQ(default="unicode_emoji")) -> HttpResponse: message, user_message = access_message(user_profile, message_id) if emoji_code is None: # The emoji_code argument is only required for rare corner # cases discussed in the long block comment below. For simple # API clients, we allow specifying just the name, and just # look up the code using the current name->code mapping. emoji_code = emoji_name_to_emoji_code(message.sender.realm, emoji_name)[0] if Reaction.objects.filter(user_profile=user_profile, message=message, emoji_code=emoji_code, reaction_type=reaction_type).exists(): raise JsonableError(_("Reaction already exists.")) query = Reaction.objects.filter(message=message, emoji_code=emoji_code, reaction_type=reaction_type) if query.exists(): # If another user has already reacted to this message with # same emoji code, we treat the new reaction as a vote for the # existing reaction. So the emoji name used by that earlier # reaction takes precedence over whatever was passed in this # request. This is necessary to avoid a message having 2 # "different" emoji reactions with the same emoji code (and # thus same image) on the same message, which looks ugly. # # In this "voting for an existing reaction" case, we shouldn't # check whether the emoji code and emoji name match, since # it's possible that the (emoji_type, emoji_name, emoji_code) # triple for this existing rection xmay not pass validation # now (e.g. because it is for a realm emoji that has been # since deactivated). We still want to allow users to add a # vote any old reaction they see in the UI even if that is a # deactivated custom emoji, so we just use the emoji name from # the existing reaction with no further validation. emoji_name = query.first().emoji_name else: # Otherwise, use the name provided in this request, but verify # it is valid in the user's realm (e.g. not a deactivated # realm emoji). check_emoji_request(message.sender.realm, emoji_name, emoji_code, reaction_type) if user_message is None: create_historical_message(user_profile, message) do_add_reaction(user_profile, message, emoji_name, emoji_code, reaction_type) return json_success() @has_request_variables def remove_reaction(request: HttpRequest, user_profile: UserProfile, message_id: int, emoji_name: Optional[str]=REQ(default=None), emoji_code: Optional[str]=REQ(default=None), reaction_type: str=REQ(default="unicode_emoji")) -> HttpResponse: message, user_message = access_message(user_profile, message_id) if emoji_code is None: if emoji_name is None: raise JsonableError(_('At least one of the following arguments ' 'must be present: emoji_name, emoji_code')) # A correct full Zulip client implementation should always # pass an emoji_code, because of the corner cases discussed in # the long block comments elsewhere in this file. However, to # make it easy for simple API clients to use the reactions API # without needing the mapping between emoji names and codes, # we allow instead passing the emoji_name and looking up the # corresponding code using the current data. emoji_code = emoji_name_to_emoji_code(message.sender.realm, emoji_name)[0] if not Reaction.objects.filter(user_profile=user_profile, message=message, emoji_code=emoji_code, reaction_type=reaction_type).exists(): raise JsonableError(_("Reaction doesn't exist.")) # Unlike adding reactions, while deleting a reaction, we don't # check whether the provided (emoji_type, emoji_code) pair is # valid in this realm. Since there's a row in the database, we # know it was valid when the user added their reaction in the # first place, so it is safe to just remove the reaction if it # exists. And the (reaction_type, emoji_code) pair may no longer be # valid in legitimate situations (e.g. if a realm emoji was # deactivated by an administrator in the meantime). do_remove_reaction(user_profile, message, emoji_code, reaction_type) return json_success()