# Widgets (experimental)

[Note: this document is currently intended to be a roadmap/design
document.  It may be converted over time to permanent documentation.]

## Overview

During 2018 we built out a "widget system" in Zulip.  It includes
these features:

- **/ping**
- **/day** (and /night, /light, /dark)
- **/poll** (and /tictactoe, /todo) (BETA)
- **zform-enabled messages** for the trivia_quiz bot (BETA)

The beta features are only turned on for chat.zulip.org as
of this writing.

There's a strong overlap between **widgets** and **slash
commands**, and many widgets are launched by slash commands.
A few exceptions are worth noting.  If you type "/me shrugs"
in the compose box, it's just a message that gets
slightly customized rendering.  And
if you type "/settings", it's just a shortcut to open
the settings popup.  Neither of these are really "widgets,"
per se.

Another exception, in the opposite direction, is our
trivia_quiz bot.  It does not involve slash commands.
Instead it sends "extra_data" in messages to invoke
**zforms** (which enable button-based UIs in the
messages).

Here are some code entities used in the above
features:

- `ALLOW_SUB_MESSAGES` setting
- `SubMessage` database table
- `/json/zcommand` API endpoint
- `/json/submessage` API endpoint
- `static/js/zform.js`
- `static/js/zcommand.js`
- `static/js/submessage.js`
- `static/js/voting_widget.js`
- `static/js/widgetize.js`
- `static/js/zform.js`
- `static/templates/widgets/`
- `zerver/lib/widget.py`
- `zerver/lib/zcommand.py`
- `zerver/views/submessage.py`

## Simple slash commands

We support a few very simple slash commands that
are intended for single users to do simple tasks:

- Ping the server
- Toggle day/night mode

### Data flow

These commands have client-side support in `zcommands.js`.
They send commands to the server using the `/json/command`
endpoint.

In the case of "/ping", the server code in `zcommand.py`
basically just acks the client.  The client then computes
the round trip time and shows a little message above
the compose box that the user can see and then dismiss.

For commands like "/day" and "/night", the server does
a little bit of logic to toggle the user's night mode
setting, and this is largely done inside `zcommand.py`.
The server sends a very basic response, and then
the client actually changes the display colors.  The
client also shows the user a little message above
the compose box instructing them how to reverse the
change.

It's a bit of a stretch to label "/ping" and "/day"
as **widgets**.  In some ways they're just compose-box
shortcuts for doing UI tasks.  The commands share
the new "zcommand" namespace in the code, and both
have some common UI for talking to users.

(It's possible that we don't really need a general
`/json/zcommand` endpoint for these, and we
may decide later to just use custom
API endpoints for each command.  There's some logic
in having a central API for these, though, since they
are typically things that only UI-based clients will
invoke, and they may share validation code.)

### Availability

The above commands are available for all Zulip servers
that use 1.9 or above.  You must use the webapp client to
get the features; other clients will send the messages
without any translation (e.g. "/day" will just be a message
that says "/day" if you use the mobile app).

## Poll, todo lists, and games

The most interactive widgets that we built during
2018 are for polls, todo lists, and games. You
launch widgets by sending one of the following messages:

- /poll
- /todo
- /tictactoe

These widgets are only turned on if you set the `ALLOW_SUB_MESSAGES`
boolean to `True` in the appropriate `settings.py`.
Currently the setting is only enabled for dev and
our main community realm (chat.zulip.org).  Also,
only the webapp client provides the "widget experience".
Other clients just show raw messages like "/poll"
or "/ticactoe".

Our customers have long requested a poll/survey widget.
See [this issue](https://github.com/zulip/zulip/issues/9736).
There are workaround ways to do polls using things like
emoji reactions, but our poll widget provides a more
interactive experience.

### Data flow

The **poll** widget uses the "submessage" architecture.
We'll use the poll widget as a concrete example.

The `SubMessage` table, as the name indicates, allows
you to associate multiple submessages to any given
`Message` row.  When a message gets sent, there's a
hook inside of `widget.py` that will detect slash
commands like "/poll".  If a message needs to be
widgetized, an initial `SubMessage` row will be
created with an appropriate `msg_type` (and persisted
to the database).  This data will also be included
in the normal Zulip message event payload.  Clients
can choose to ignore the submessage-related data, in
which case they'll gracefully degrade to seeing "/poll".
Of course, the webapp client actually recognizes the
appropriate widgets.

The webapp client will next collect poll options and votes
from users.  The webapp client has
code in `submessage.js` that dispatches events
to `widgetize.js`, which in turns sends events to
individual widgets.  The widgets know how to render
themselves and set up click/input handlers to collect
data.  They can then post back to `/json/submessage`
to attach more data to the message (and the
details are encapsulated with a callback).  The server
will continue to persist `SubMessage` rows in the
database.  These rows are encoded as JSON, and the
schema of the messages is driven by the individual widgets.
Most of the logic is in the client; things are fairly opaque
to the server at this point.

The "submessage" architecture is generic.
Our tictactoe widget and todo list widget use
the same architecture as "poll".

If a client joins Zulip after a message has accumulated
several submessage events, it will see all of those
events the first time it sees the parent message.  Clients
need to know how to build/rebuild their state as each
submessage comes in.  They also need to tolerate
misformatted data, ideally just dropping data on the floor.
If a widget throws an exception, it's caught before the
rest of the message feed is affected.

As far as rendering is concerned, each widget module
is given a parent `elem` when its `activate` function
is called.  This is just a `<div>` inside of the parent
message in the message pane.  The widget has access to
jQuery and template.render, and the developer can create
new templates in `static/templates/widgets/`.

A good way to learn the system is to read the code
in `static/js/voting_widget.js`.  It is worth noting that
writing a new widget requires only minor backend
changes in the current architecture.  This could change
in the future, but for now a frontend developer mostly
needs to know JS, CSS, and HTML.

It may be useful to think of widgets in terms of a
bunch of clients exchanging peer-to-peer messages.  The
server's only real role is to decide who gets delivered
which submessages.  It's a lot like a "subchat" system.

### Backward compatibility

Our "submessage" widgets are still evolving, and we want
to have a plan for allowing future progress without
breaking old messages.

Widget developers can revise code to improve a
widget's visual polish without too much concern
for breaking how old messages get widgetized.  They will need to
be more cautious if they change the actual data
structures passed around in the submessage payloads.

For significant schema changes, it would be worthwhile to add
some kind of versioning scheme inside of `SubMessages`, either
at the DB level or more at the JSON level within fields.
This has yet to be designed.  One thing to consider is that
most widgets are somewhat ephemeral in nature, so it's not
the end of the world if upgrades cause some older messages
to be obsolete, as long as the code degrades gracefully.

Mission critical widgets should have a deprecation strategy.
For example, you could add optional features for one version
bump and then only make them mandatory for the next version,
as long as you don't radically change the data model.  And
if you're truly making radical changes, you can always
write a Django migration for the `SubMessage` data.

### Adding widgets

Right now we don't have a plugin model for the above widgets;
they are served up by the core Zulip server implementation.
Of course, anybody who wishes to build their own widget
has the option of forking the server code and self-hosting,
but we want to encourage folks to submit widget
code to our codebase in PRs.  If we get to a critical mass
of contributed widgets, we will want to explore a more
dynamic mechanism for "plugging in" code from outside sources,
but that is not in our immediate roadmap.

This is sort of a segue to the next section of this document.
Suppose you want to write your own custom bot, and you
want to allow users to click buttons to respond to options,
but you don't want to have to modify the Zulip server codebase
to turn on those features.  This is where our "zform"
architecture comes to the rescue.

## zform (Trivia Quiz bot)

This section will describe our "zform" architecture.

For context, imagine a naive triva bot.  The trivia bot
sends a question with the answers labeled as A, B, C,
and D.  Folks who want to answer the bot send back an
answer have to send an actual Zulip message with something
like `@trivia_bot answer A to Q01`, which is kind of
tedious to type.  Wouldn't it be nice if the bot could
serve up some kind of buttons with canned replies, so
that the user just hits a button?

That is where zforms come in.  Zulip's trivia bot sends
the Zulip server a JSON representation of a form it
wants rendered, and then the client renders a generic
"**zform**" with buttons corresponding to `short_name` fields
inside a `choices` list inside of the JSON payload.

Here is what an example payload looks like:

~~~ json
{
    "extra_data": {
        "type": "choices",
        "heading": "05: What color is a blueberry?",
        "choices": [
            {
                "type": "multiple_choice",
                "reply": "answer 05 A",
                "long_name": "red",
                "short_name": "A"
            },
            {
                "type": "multiple_choice",
                "reply": "answer 05 B",
                "long_name": "blue",
                "short_name": "B"
            },
            {
                "type": "multiple_choice",
                "reply": "answer 05 C",
                "long_name": "yellow",
                "short_name": "C"
            },
            {
                "type": "multiple_choice",
                "reply": "answer 05 D",
                "long_name": "orange",
                "short_name": "D"
            }
        ]
    },
    "widget_type": "zform"
}
~~~

When users click on the buttons, **generic** click
handlers automatically simulate a client reply using
a field called `reply` (in `choices`) as the content
of the message reply.  Then the bot sees the reply
and grades the answer using ordinary chat-bot coding.

The beautiful thing is that any thrid party developer
can enhance bots that are similar to the **trivia_quiz**
bot without touching any Zulip code, because **zforms**
are completely generic.  (The only caveat is that
the server must turn on `ALLOW_SUB_MESSAGES`.)

## Data flow

We can walk through the steps from the bot generating
the **zform** to the client rendering it.


First,
[here](https://github.com/zulip/python-zulip-api/blob/master/zulip_bots/zulip_bots/bots/trivia_quiz/trivia_quiz.py)
is the code that produces the JSON.

``` py
def format_quiz_for_widget(quiz_id: str, quiz: Dict[str, Any]) -> str:
    widget_type = 'zform'
    question = quiz['question']
    answers = quiz['answers']

    heading = quiz_id + ': ' + question

    def get_choice(letter: str) -> Dict[str, str]:
        answer = answers[letter]
        reply = 'answer ' + quiz_id + ' ' + letter

        return dict(
            type='multiple_choice',
            short_name=letter,
            long_name=answer,
            reply=reply,
        )

    choices = [get_choice(letter) for letter in 'ABCD']

    extra_data = dict(
        type='choices',
        heading=heading,
        choices=choices,
    )

    widget_content = dict(
        widget_type=widget_type,
        extra_data=extra_data,
    )
    payload = json.dumps(widget_content)
    return payload
```

The above code processes data that is specific to a trivia
quiz, but it follows a generic schema.

The bot sends the JSON payload to the server using the
`send_reply` callback.

The bot framework looks for the optional `widget_content`
parameter in `send_reply` and includes that in the
message payload it sends to the server.

The server validates the schema of `widget_content` using
`check_widget_content`.

Then code inside of `zerver/lib/widget.py` builds a single
`SubMessage` row to contain the **zform** payload, and the
server also sends this payload to all clients who are
recipients of the parent message.

When the message gets to the client, the codepath for **zform**
is actually quite similar to what happens with more
customized widgets like **poll** and **tictactoe**.  (In
fact, **zform** is a sibling of **poll** and **tictactoe**, and **zform**
just has a somewhat more generic job to do.) In
`static/js/widgetize.js` you will see where this code
converges, with snippets like this:

~~~ js
widgets.poll = voting_widget;
widgets.tictactoe = tictactoe_widget;
widgets.todo = todo_widget;
widgets.zform = zform;
~~~

The code in `static/js/zform.js` renders the form (not
shown here) and then sets up a click handler like below:

~~~ js
    elem.find('button').on('click', function (e) {
        e.stopPropagation();

        // Grab our index from the markup.
        var idx = $(e.target).attr('data-idx');

        // Use the index from the markup to dereference our
        // data structure.
        var reply_content = data.choices[idx].reply;

        transmit.reply_message({
            message: opts.message,
            content: reply_content,
        });
    });
~~~

And then we are basically done!

## Slash commands

This document is more about "widget" behavior than
"slash command" interfaces, but there is indeed a
lot of overlap between the two concepts.

We will soon introduce typeahead capability for slash
syntax, including things that are somewhat outliers
such as the "/me" command.

If certain widget features are behind feature flags,
this will slightly complicate the typeahead
implementation.  Mostly we just need the server
to share any relevant settings with the client.