[pycodestyle] ignore = # Each of these rules are ignored for the explained reason. # "multiple spaces before operator" # There are several typos here, but also several instances that are # being used for alignment in dict keys/values using the `dict` # constructor. We could fix the alignment cases by switching to the `{}` # constructor, but it makes fixing this rule a little less # straightforward. E221, # 'missing whitespace around arithmetic operator' # This should possibly be cleaned up, though changing some of # these may make the code less readable. E226, # New rules in pycodestyle 2.4.0 that we haven't decided whether to comply with yet E252, W504, # "multiple spaces after ':'" # This is the `{}` analogue of E221, and these are similarly being used # for alignment. E241, # "unexpected spaces around keyword / parameter equals" # Many of these should be fixed, but many are also being used for # alignment/making the code easier to read. E251, # "block comment should start with '#'" # These serve to show which lines should be changed in files customized # by the user. We could probably resolve one of E265 or E266 by # standardizing on a single style for lines that the user might want to # change. E265, # "too many leading '#' for block comment" # Most of these are there for valid reasons. E266, # "expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition" # Zulip only uses 1 blank line after class/function # definitions; the PEP-8 recommendation results in super sparse code. E302, E305, # "module level import not at top of file" # Most of these are there for valid reasons, though there might be a # few that could be eliminated. E402, # "line too long" # Zulip is a bit less strict about line length, and has its # own check for this (see max_length) E501, # "do not assign a lambda expression, use a def" # Fixing these would probably reduce readability in most cases. E731, # "line break before binary operator" # This is a bug in the `pep8`/`pycodestyle` tool -- it's completely backward. # See https://github.com/PyCQA/pycodestyle/issues/498 . W503, # This number will probably be used for the corrected, inverse version of # W503 when that's added: https://github.com/PyCQA/pycodestyle/pull/502 # Once that fix lands and we update to a version of pycodestyle that has it, # we'll want the rule; but we might have to briefly ignore it while we fix # existing code. # W504,